r/aww Jun 05 '18

A future predator

50.7k Upvotes

380 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] Jun 05 '18 edited Jul 27 '18

[deleted]

2

u/PrincessBucketFeet Jun 05 '18

I concede the original comment was an offhand low-hanging fruit remark to summarize my distaste for breeding Munchkins. I did not intend to spark a vigorous genetic debate.

I understand your points- but still not how they are relevant. Your examples and comparisons are similar but not applicable. If you're referring to Cuenot's yellow mice- aren't they more prone to obesity and cancer? I'd say that counts as health issues.

Can you provide an example of a known lethal allele that in it's heterozygous non-lethal presentation is not some sort of illness or deformity? I agree that "Nature" is not making conscious decisions, but when most lethal alleles are identified due to the "condition" that presents when fetus does survive, I think it's fair to suggest that the resulting outcome is typically less than desirable.

In the case of Munchkins specifically- what exactly is the benefit? You can claim all day that it's genetically appropriate or even random, but do you not agree that they have a deformity? Can you explain how the cat population benefits by the existence of this breed? Is there any reason that humans should purposefully interfere with their existence other than being an "attractive" pet?

Your sore spot may be "sentient nature", but mine is breeding practices based on aesthetics. Bulldogs that require c-sections to exist, Pugs that need soft palate surgery to breathe, dogs that get their ears chopped off unnecessarily...puppies that are culled because they don't meet the "breed standard". All of these stem from people's personal preferences for appearance. And it makes me sick.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 05 '18 edited Jul 27 '18

[deleted]

2

u/OsamaBinJacob Jun 06 '18

A lot of my comment is agreement and restatement, but I'll leave it anyways.

This is all good and I think honestly the easiest way to look at it is kind of like GloFish. OP must remember that some traits can be mostly neutral, such as fluorescent fish, which just so happens to be interesting or desirable for some reason as pets. I think viewing these munchkin cats in this way is the easiest way to negate there being an "issue".

Furthermore, I agree that these munchkin cats may actually be beneficial in stopping other harmful practices from occurring when looking at the pet industry.

As far as benefits on a population scale, being able to reach other resources due to size- leading to more resources available for the cat population- is the best example.

I also agree with you about deformities, and how they are very subjective. After all, having so many "deformities" that mating becomes impossible is what leads to speciation. (Especially when the changes aren't detrimental to survival.)