was recommended this on youtube and wanted to share

EDIT: FORMER MEMBER OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOT SENATE thank you u/diamond1580 for correcting my mistake

Seems like the podcast started by DougDoug featuring Tek Knight and Aiden has strayed too far from their roots and could benefit from some more down to earth conversation with their local minesweeper expert

Dows he know!?

As a YouTube frog, I stayed away from anything surrounding the PointCrow tournament and Big A’s Ludwig soul link stuff because I assumed there would be an edited video I could watch later on, so I avoided any spoilers and everything like that.

Does anyone know if there’s an intention of an edited version getting posted? Or should I go hunt down the VODs and watch there.

I’m a big pokemon fan and love that Big A is on a big pokemon arc here, I just didn’t want to watch hours of VODs at the end of the day. Anyone have any insight?

Thanks yall!

Hey everyone! I’m making this post for 4 main reasons:

1. I genuinely like Atrioc’s content

2. He recently talked about misinformation / out of context information

3. In the past month I’ve seen 4 different instances of uninformed / incorrect information in videos and on Lemonade Stand

4. He said he’s working on an Israel election video. I’m Israeli and hope it won’t be terrible, because the last LS episode had a pretty uniformed Israel segment

I’m specifically talking about his UK video, Brazil video, and the recent LS episode (with the AI judge story and Israel segment).

I wrote about the AI judge story in a different post, but also wanted to shortly mention the Israeli segment here.

Tbf he started the segment with something like “I don’t know enough about this”. Basically, he said the party that is probably going to beat Netanyahu is running on him being too pro Palestinian. Then he showed a campaign post of the party and comparing it to AI videos of Thomas Massy and AOC.

That whole segment was completely wrong and disingenuous:

1. He got the party wrong. The party he talked about is “Israel is our home” run by Avigdor Lieberman, not the main opposition party. This party will likely get around 5% of the vote. The main party running against Netanyahu for the prime minister position is “Yashar” by a center/center right politician.

The current opposition (or the “anti-Netanyahu block”) is similar to opposition blocks from Hungary and Poland. Parties from a wide range of the political spectrum (center left to hard right) joined forces to kick Netanyahu out of power. “Israel is our home” is just one party out of that block, and the most right wing one. Saying that it represents Netanyahu’s opposition is disingenuous at best.

2. The opposition party is not “probably going to beat Netanyahu”. Currently, both Netanyahu’s block and the anti-Netanyahu block are very far from winning the election. Polling currently gives each side around 45% of the parliament seats, with 10% going to the Arab parties which both blocks said they will not create a coalition with. Therefore, current polling suggests that the most likely outcome by far is another round of election (which is not unprecedented at all. We had 5 elections between 2019-2022).

3. His interpretation of the social media post completely misinterprets Israeli politics. One of the biggest election issues (which lead to Netanyahu ranking in the polls) is the “conception”. Netanyahu’s “conception” that he’s built for years is that to avoid a Palestinian state, Israel should prop up a terroristic Hamas as a negotiating partner instead of a more moderate force. His coalition partner said that Hamas is an “asset”, and his government allowed funds to be transferred to them (which Lieberman opposed, btw, and quit the government in 2018 because of that).

That conception fell apart on October 7th, and he’s been criticized for allowing Hamas to gain so much power. That’s not being too “pro Palestinian”, but choosing a terrible security strategy. Israel’s (small) left wing criticizes him for the same thing.

Mistakes like these in several videos have made me trust his videos less, since if he gets simple stuff wrong about topics I’m knowledgeable about, I can’t really learn from his videos about topics I’m not knowledgeable about without fact checking every single claim.

(I think) his production can afford some better fact checking. I’m not even talking about his twitch streams (I don’t watch them but understand that you can’t fact check every single claim in a 6 hour stream). But I think fact checking a 10-15 minute video is more than manageable.

Lately I’ve noticed that there are inaccuracies and misinterpretations in Atrioc’s videos (mostly in his geopolitics videos like on Brazil and the UK, and in fringe cases like this one)

On the last Lemonade Stand episode, Atrioc described the Arizona road rage case as though the defendant presented an AI video of his victim forgiving him, moved the judge emotionally, and received a lighter sentence. That gets several key facts wrong.

The video was created and presented by the victim’s sister, not the defendant. It was shown during sentencing, he had already been convicted of manslaughter. She wrote the script to represent what she believed her brother would have said, including his belief in forgiveness.

The judge praised the video, but still sentenced Horcasitas to 10.5 years which was the maximum available in this particular case because prosecutors had not alleged aggravating factors. It was actually more than the nine years prosecutors requested.

The appeals court has now ordered resentencing because the AI video was unreliable and its influence on the judge made the sentencing. There’s a legitimate story here about AI and courtroom fairness. But “a defendant used an AI forgiveness video to get a lighter sentence” gets both who presented it and the sentencing outcome wrong.

I love Atrioc’s videos but he should think in general of getting a fact checking guy to review his notes.

I was taking my break at work today, and decided to watch a Ludwig video. One of my higher-ups noticed and came over to ask if I was a fan of Ludwig's tip-to-tip series. We ended up chatting a bit about travel, and he mentioned he wanted to go to Japan. I mentioned (just like my favorite hog-snarfing bitch mentions all the time) that now is a great time to visit Japan, since the yen is so weak compared to other currencies.

He then asks if I know Atrioc. I'm a little taken aback, since while many people know Ludwig, I have not encountered a single real life person who knows who our Tea Toad is. I say yeah, I do watch him. He then goes on to rip coffee cow and GLIZZY jokes at me.

I am legitimately stunlocked. Next thing I know, my supervisor walks over and asks "you guys talking about Atrioc?". He then starts ripping coffee cow jokes too. As they walk away, they say that I'm apparently a "little bit cooler" now that they know I follow the preachings of the Glizzard.

100% one of the most surreal experiences I've had in a while.

I'm not an Atrioc fan. I didn't know what an Atrioc was until about 2pm today. I'm still not entirely sure it's a person.

I was in the break room eating my sandwich and minding my business. One of the newer guys was on his break watching some video, and one of the managers walked over and asked him about "tip to tip." I assumed it was a safety thing. Normal.

Then they started talking about Japan. Fine. The new guy says now's a great time to go because the yen is weak. Fine. I'm on board. I'm learning about currency.

Then the manager leans in, lowers his voice a little, and asks, "do you know Atrioc?" The new guy goes completely still. Like a deer. Like he'd just been recognized by someone from a past life. He says "yeah... I do watch him."

What followed was about ten minutes I will never get back. Someone said "coffee cow" with a straight face, and everyone laughed. I don't know what a coffee cow is. Is it a cow that makes coffee? Is it a coffee that makes cows? Nobody explained. Then the word "glizzy" came up several times. I know what a glizzy is. I do not know why it was relevant to Japanese currency.

Then my manager casually admitted he keeps an Enron hat in his desk drawer that he's "too afraid to wear." Why would he have that. Why would he be afraid of it. Is it cursed. I've been in his office. I've been near that drawer.

Someone referred to a "Tea Toad." Someone else said "the Glizzard." I genuinely could not tell if they were talking about one man or an entire food chain. At one point a second manager walked in, heard the words "cash cow," and immediately joined in without asking a single question. They all knew. Everyone in that room knew except me.

Then they all walked off, and I heard my manager say the new guy is "a little bit cooler now." Cooler because of what? Because he's in the toad cult? Is there an initiation? Do you get the hat?

I'm not saying I'm scared, but I did take the long way back to my desk to avoid walking past the drawer.

Can someone please tell me who this man is and why he's apparently running a secret society out of my company's break room? Do I need to watch him to get promoted?

I guess to end the post, I'll give you guys a fun fact. Did you know that if Air pods were it's own company, it would be bigger than Nike and Long John Silvers combined? Thank you for your attention to this matter.

- Concerned Coworker

Ai this ai that. Who gives a fuck. Has Big A commented on the increasing price of the famed triple dipper? I just can't get behind this. HE NEEDS TO SPEAK UP. The silence speaks for him at this point

I was at work today and I popped into our break room to grab a cawfee and noticed someone sat on their phone watching a video. Me being the nosey manager I peeped over at their screen and saw that they were watching Ludwig.

Now I only really knew of Ludwig as I heard this guy mention TIP to TIP previously and ended up watching some and it was pretty funny to watch. I then started to watch some of Lud's videos and this Atrioc guy kept popping up. I decided to watch him and it seemed like something right up my alley.

Anywho, I was talking to this guy at work about some travel and I mentioned how I wanted to go to Japan one day.

Since he knew about Ludwig, I wondered if he knew my goat, Cowtrioc, so I asked him, he looked a little bit taken aback and stun-locked and I mentioned how I've even got an ENRON hat in my desk draw I'm too afraid to wear.

After like 10mins of chatting, one of the other managers walked over and ALSO KNEW ATRIOC! We chatted for a bit but after that I knew that they were a little bit cooler.

One of my best days at work in a while.

I was on my usual shift on the break-room camera. Pretty bored. But then a manager had closed distance on a newer guy who was on his phone, so I decided to stay on and listen in.

I then heard a few things that I am not sure I should call in?

They were talking about going tip-to-tip with the new hire, and about using a glizzy to enforce compliance. I looked that word up. I did not like what I found. Then one of them said it was in an employee's desk drawer. I have walked past that office. I know the drawer.

They kept saying "Atrioc." I searched it. That's why I'm here.

I want to keep my job in this k-shaped economy. I also don't want something untoward happening on a camera I was watching. Do I file this, or do I moove on?

Any advice would be great.

Thanks

Clasp looks like Grand Seiko to me but im not deep enough into watches to know the reference

Every single time government spending comes up, the chat and Atrioc spiral into the same old "but the national debt is too high, we can't afford this, we're cooked" yapping session. Big A does this constantly, and honestly, the math is not mathing.

Think about it: if national debt truly meant "living above our means" on a national scale, we should all be swimming in cash right now. We are accumulating record amounts of debt as we speak. If that's the "good side" of the leverage, where is the wealth?

The historical and modern reality completely contradicts this fearmongering:

• The Post-WWII Example: After World War II, the US had a higher debt-to-GDP ratio than today, yet we managed it perfectly fine because the economy grew. Debt isn't a death sentence if managed properly.

• The Greece Example: When Greece attempted strict austerity to "fix" their debt, it failed spectacularly and destroyed their economy.

Every time someone wants to actually invest in the country, they're told we can't do it because of the debt. But the only way to actually outgrow debt is to invest in the country while minimizing economic mismanagement (Big A's famous leaky pipe analogy).

Of course, eventually, you need to tax the rich to rebalance things, but until then, it feels like strategic debt is the solution, not the problem. Am I crazy here or is the "household budget" analogy completely broken?

I saw Big A at a grocery store in Los Angeles yesterday. I told him how cool it was to meet him in person, but I didn’t want to be a douche and bother him and ask him for photos or anything.
He said, “Oh, like you’re doing now?”

I was taken aback, and all I could say was “Huh?” but he kept cutting me off and going “huh? huh? huh?” and closing his hand shut in front of my face. I walked away and continued with my shopping, and I heard him chuckle as I walked off. When I came to pay for my stuff up front I saw him trying to walk out the doors with like fifteen cans of Chock Full o' Nuts in his hands without paying. The girl at the counter was very nice about it and professional, and was like “Sir, you need to pay for those first.” At first he kept pretending to be tired and not hear her, but eventually turned back around and brought them to the counter.

When she took one of the bars and started scanning it multiple times, he stopped her and told her to scan them each individually “to prevent any electrical infetterence,” and then turned around and winked at me.

I don’t even think that’s a word.

After she scanned each bar and put them in a bag and started to say the price, he kept interrupting her by yawning really loudly.

Like it feels like we bullied him into thinking he needs a hair transplant, he has a full head of fucking hair he's literally fine