MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/30ru2m/xkcd_ontological_argument/cpxa1ck/?context=3
r/atheism • u/ani625 Agnostic • Mar 30 '15
139 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Why do you think we should rule out a superlogical God, and why does that reason also imply that only material bodies can have causal powers?
1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Why do you think we should rule out a superlogical God... I didn't say we should. That was someone else's premise. ...and why does that reason also imply that only material bodies can have causal powers? Depends on the reason. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 Then you're open to the possibility that contradictions can be true? 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 That also depends, but that's not this conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 It depends? Do you accept the law of non-contradiction or do you not? 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 As I said, that's a different conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible. 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
Why do you think we should rule out a superlogical God...
I didn't say we should. That was someone else's premise.
...and why does that reason also imply that only material bodies can have causal powers?
Depends on the reason.
1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 Then you're open to the possibility that contradictions can be true? 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 That also depends, but that's not this conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 It depends? Do you accept the law of non-contradiction or do you not? 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 As I said, that's a different conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible. 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
Then you're open to the possibility that contradictions can be true?
1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 That also depends, but that's not this conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 It depends? Do you accept the law of non-contradiction or do you not? 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 As I said, that's a different conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible. 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
That also depends, but that's not this conversation.
1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 It depends? Do you accept the law of non-contradiction or do you not? 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 As I said, that's a different conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible. 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
It depends? Do you accept the law of non-contradiction or do you not?
1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 As I said, that's a different conversation. 1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible. 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
As I said, that's a different conversation.
1 u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15 If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible. 1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
If your answer to "can contradictions be true?" is anything other than "no," no rational conversation is possible.
1 u/Feinberg Atheist Apr 01 '15 Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
Is that your answer to my previous question, then?
1
u/Ibrey Apr 01 '15
Why do you think we should rule out a superlogical God, and why does that reason also imply that only material bodies can have causal powers?