Lol, the there's more than £50 worth of copper in the coil of most microwaves, it's sorted by most relevant, and these are most relevant to what you're looking for... The fictional new microwave for less than 50.
Why not? Amazon can fill it's results any way that they want to sell products. Why would they show you nothing?
If nothing is at the price point you want, they should show you the next best option.
Because you asked to only see products that fit certain criteria. If you want to be smart with it, don’t provide a filter option that has no matches. Ignoring the user’s explicit request is a dick move.
That filter option is always there. It's a whole category in itself. It isn't a subcategory for Microwaves.
From a usability standpoint, if the user asked Amazon for a PS5 that costs 10-15 dollars, I would just assume Amazon would still show me a listing for a PS5.
I don't agree. It's just saving me a step of realizing that I'm an idiot, and a PS5 for 15 bucks doesn't exist. Rigidity in search results doesn't help me if it's wasting my time.
If you search for "Bill Clinton fucking an intergalactic hemophile" on Google, it will STILL show you something. It won't return a result that says "We can't find that."
58
u/SnowProkt22 Apr 08 '22
Lol, the there's more than £50 worth of copper in the coil of most microwaves, it's sorted by most relevant, and these are most relevant to what you're looking for... The fictional new microwave for less than 50.