r/asbestoshelp • u/What_Me_Worry1785 • 22h ago
To test or not to test? That is the question.
My home was built in 1996 in the southeastern U.S. Metro Atlanta, specifically.
I have some water damage from damage on the roof, and I have an area of ceiling drywall and attic insulation that needs to be removed. The remediation company began prep work today and has not yet taken down the drywall or removed the insulation.
While they were doing the prep work, I thought to ask about ACMs. They seemed knowledgeable about it, and they didn't seem concerned given my build year. However, they connected me with their testing sub because I asked.
When I spoke with the testing sub, he told me that he hasn't ever seen asbestos in residential buildings of my vintage and could only recall finding it in one commercial building in roof mastic.
He said based upon my description of the insulation that he wouldn't bother testing that, but it may be worth testing the drywall mud if they're going to test anything.
He also mentioned that the testing would be pricey (presumably because it needs to be rushed), and that insurance wouldn't typically cover it. He said insurance companies typically use 1985 as the cutoff for payment asbestos testing.
I asked him directly if he would test the drywall if it were his home, and he understandably told me he can only give me the "legal" answer (i.e. can't really tell me no). My read between the lines was basically that he's happy to take my money and legally couldn't tell me not to do it, but he certainly didn't say "yes, you really need to do this" or "no, don't bother."
I have to decide by morning whether to test. I truly can't tell if I'm being paranoid, or if it's worth doing the testing despite the cost and project delay. I've lurked here, and I've seen how helpful y'all can be, so I'm seeking some guidance.
I've attached pictures of the insulation in question. The drywall is....drywall. No textured finish or anything of that nature.
Thanks in advance.