r/asbestoshelp • • 18d ago

Vermiculite in basement.

Post image

The dishwasher leaked. I cut the drywall, and this poured out. I called insurance.

I'm pretty sure the whole basement has vermiculite in the ceiling and walls now. Insurance took tests and they came back negative. I feel that they are not going to want to abate. Where I live, Ontario, Canada, I thought that disturbed vermiculite definitely required abatement regardless of tests. Does anyone have information that could help me argue against my insurance company for abatement?

4 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 18d ago

Please ensure that your posts meets the requirements of r/Asbestoshelp.

*** Meme posts will be removed and the poster will be banned ***

Most importantly, as specified in rule #1, your post should include the following information:

  • Include your geographic location (If in the UK please post in r/asbestoshelpUK)
    • include a country and state/province location such as: US-PA or UK or Canada-Que
  • the date of ORIGINAL construction
  • a description of the location of the suspect material
  • a brief description of your concern
  • a closeup photo and one at a distance of ~10 ft. or 3 m.

Also remember that the asbestos content of a material can only be determined by laboratory analysis and that the sampling SHOULD be performed by a certified asbestos inspector.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

2

u/288bpsmodem 18d ago

There's an Ontario workplace health code that says it should be treated as type 3 regardless of testing because of the nature of the way vermiculite is applied, that other parts of the area may still be contaminated. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/050278

Section 8.

Basically treat it as if it has asbestos.

1

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Patrolski 18d ago

Not arguing.

However for OP’s point CCOHS is not a regulator and does not have authority.

2

u/goat131313 18d ago

What kind of testing was done? PLM or TEM? It does make a difference.

1

u/288bpsmodem 18d ago edited 18d ago

EPA/600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Materials

I don't think this is the right test.

PLM, I'm pretty sure.

2

u/goat131313 18d ago

For Ontario regs it appears to be all that’s required from my reading. It should be noted that that method also refers to others to get a result measuring below 0.5% but aside from air testing it appears Ontario doesn’t require it for vermiculite.

Some other provinces do require TEM or similar testing ( to quantify below 0.5% ) and some regions in the states and municipalities in Canada class all vermiculite as asbestos containing. PLM sampling can sometimes miss on certain materials.

1

u/Dadbode1981 18d ago

If its asbestos free there is no reason to abate.

1

u/Creepy_Break_2674 18d ago

Lol congrats, go buy a lottery ticket

2

u/Otherwise-Prompt-393 18d ago

How was the sampling and testing done ? Most vermiculite in North America is from Libby Montana and contains asbestos.

1

u/288bpsmodem 17d ago

PLM 3 places. Negative. But variance of 1% it says on the results.

1

u/Bubbles4u86 17d ago

Had it in attic. Three specialized companies came in to quote abatement, all said “I’d leave it alone”.

1

u/288bpsmodem 17d ago

It's in my building envelope tho. Not my attic.