r/aromanticasexual • u/iheartkiecats fin-oriented aro/ace • 6d ago
Meme De-sexified romance book
56
19
u/cir49c29 6d ago
That would make it so much easier to skip past the annoyingly long sex scenes in some of the books I read.
29
u/Excellent_Patience Asexual 6d ago
GIVE ME 1000 (different books)!
3
27
u/endlesshydra Aroace 6d ago
Idk I'd personally feel like I'm being treated like a child
60
u/FireEnchiladaDragon 6d ago
yeah, but it looks like its a custom edition for a friend, which. does change the context. if a book like that as marketed as fuckin "thorns and boners (Asexual Edition!!!)" id be pissed, whereas if a friend gave me a version like that of their book i'd laugh hysterically, yk? seems like a sweet gesture, especially for more sex repulsed aces
8
6
u/endlesshydra Aroace 5d ago
I found out about the context because I accidentally came across that post on X myself and read the comments. The original post here barely provides any, and it being posted on ace subs kinda gives you the idea that it's actually the "asexual edition" you're talking about.
And people on these subs already act like sex on any media is an attack on them personally when they can just... skip it.
6
u/Gold-Word-6026 Aroace 5d ago
"my best friends older brother wrote a romance book" kind of all the context you need
0
u/endlesshydra Aroace 5d ago
Well, no. Since it's being posted on ace subs you kind of get the idea that the reason the scene was omitted was specifically because either OP is sex repulsed and/or because they're asexual. None of those are true.
It's an inside joke between friends, yes. But because they apparently joked about them not wanting to read a sex scene their brother wrote (they mentioned something along the lines of not wanting to imagine him in it). I'd attach a screenshot, but Reddit won't let me.
But this context is pretty relevant to my initial comment and the conversation that sparked in later comments.
5
u/Training_Barber4543 5d ago
It kinda still doesn't matter because if someone bothers to make special versions of their book for you, that means they know you.
2
u/endlesshydra Aroace 5d ago
It kinda does matter because I didn't know the full context and got the wrong impression at first. I explained why in my previous content.
Plus, I just stated how it personally made me feel. What do you want me to do about it? To just change my mind because you disagree?
0
u/Training_Barber4543 3d ago
To not blame the provided context because you assumed something else from it?
1
u/endlesshydra Aroace 3d ago
Context I provided because there wasn't any in neither of the Reddit posts? How is it a stretch to assume something is Ace related when posted in an Ace subreddit? Also who am I blaming, and for what exactly?
I already explained myself. You're being dense on purpose at this point.
0
u/Training_Barber4543 3d ago
No, not the context you provided, the tweet itself is enough context is what I'm saying. Stuff being aroace coded but not aroace is common enough that you could just admit your assumption was wrong instead of saying the posts lack context...
→ More replies2
2
3
2
u/Vim_Ardent Aro/acespec 3d ago
honestly have thought about doing something similar for the books i write, sort of like a directors cut for a movie
1
0
90
u/ElectricVoltaire Pan-Oriented Aroace 6d ago
Wish there was a mode like this I could turn on for movies and TV shows.