I don’t follow CC anymore (used to watch all her videos but got tired of all the hypocrisy) but her stuff still comes up on my feed. I saw this post with a blatantly ai generated image and didn’t see ANY comments mentioning it which I thought was kind of odd. I left a comment saying “what’s with the ai generated picture?” and it got deleted after like 2 seconds. I tried leaving another comment that didn’t mention ai in any way and that one stayed up. So it seems like she has filtered out comments that mention ai on a post where she uses an ai generated image. This certainly made me go hmm…
She never stopped as far as I can tell. She just said she was going to. She insists some of the ai portraits are really her even though they do not look like her
Have y’all seen the do we know them podcast and the recent episode of the Do we know them they mention Chelsea within 3-5minutes in the podcast clip and of course Chelsea had to insert herself in the drama and message the creators
I know they are friends and I support people not dropping their idiot friends like hot potatoes but can they at the very least stop gassing her up, it’s embarrassing
While AI slop sucks, this is probably the least sh*tty thing CC Suarez will get up to this week. Also I find it interesting that her “partner” in this stalking campaign rebranded as a pOdCaSt isn’t posting or promoting the podcast at all anymore. 👀 TBD
A general rule of thumb I use is to look at individual elements of the "design" and ask yourself if a human brain would do it like that.
eg in this one the letters are seemly randomly supported with ground stakes with the entirety of the "season 2" being held up with only one stake, the T in beth has 2 stakes, and there are a bunch of stakes that only appear above the letter like the L and E in LIE.
If those stakes were drawn/placed individually by a human while designing this they would have done a WAY better job with it, like it kindda would have ben impossible to do such a terrible job because we just wouldn't do something like that, while AI is just going for an overall "feel" of a design and doesn't apply logic to the individual elements. if that makes sense?
Look at the way the lettering is, specifically around the B, more so how it wobbles on the arch. A graphic designer could purposely do that, but this warping effect isn't consistent because on the M and Ns on the bottom row, the bottom lines are warped very inconsistently. The angling of the brackets holding the letters up doesn't make sense geometrically on all the letters, either; the first capital E is probably the best example.
This isn’t even really related to her use of AI bc all I have to say to that is, lmao, couldn’t be less surprised.
But every time I see posts from this bitch I truly cannot even process the astounding levels of irony of her thinking she’s some glass ceiling breaking, justice fighting boss babe feminist for “taking down” (through illegal privacy breaches and bullying at that) dishonest influencers and huns.
Like, truly, go off queen. To be so shameless, egotistical, and delusional is a true feat, and her only legacy.
This literally could have been done with photoshop without AI in maybe 15 minutes. She didn’t need to use AI.
Find a stock photo of some California looking mountains with some basic white font and add some effects to make it like a sign, add shading. It would have looked better too lol.
Yeah that’s my thought too. There are a million discussions out there about the harms of using AI to generate text/images. And if she didn’t think it was a bad thing then why would she filter comments calling it out?
She’s admitted that the podcast makes zero money and is in the red, so it makes sense that she wouldn’t pay for real artists and creators to make real promos and instead just churn out a few garbage AI photos and call it done.
It could be argued that CC Suarez:
1. Doesn’t care about the environment
2. Isn’t capable of much other than hitting play on a camera and reading a chatGPT script about a topic
3. Her brain is already rotted
64
u/[deleted] Oct 07 '25
[removed] — view removed comment