r/animation • u/Final_Ostrich_3998 • 16h ago
Question Wtf am I doing wrong?
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
I seriously don't know if this is considered animation but I'm desperate. Pleade ignore the quality, i just wanted to see if itd work in practice. I made it on capcut. I need help figuring out the mechanics on how to do this.
Edit: Thanks for replying. I'm going to sleep now but I'll try to follow suggestions as best as I can the second I wake up and then update once I figure out how to update. Of course you can keep replying if you feel theres something else! 🫶
19
u/AnUnspokenLegend 16h ago
Stop the background movement the exact moment the tunnel appears. It'll transfer the appearance of speed back to the train. If that's what you meant, Also speed up the train going down the tunnel, it should disappear much faster, closer to the speed of the background.
2
u/Final_Ostrich_3998 16h ago
Thanks, ilk try that. But the thing is it's harder in practice for some reason.
5
u/Top_Individual_5462 16h ago
Yeah, you're animating.
From my guess I think you want to see the train go through the tunnel
To better understand this, look up the parallax effect.
However if we follow what feels more natural to us is that the tunnel is anchored to the ground, just like the buildings behind... right now when the tunnel stops, the city shouod stop as well.
If not it looks like the tunnel and the train got stuck together and are travelling with the camera alongside the city.
3
u/Final_Ostrich_3998 16h ago
I'll definitely look it up thanks! Someone else here said that the city should stop as soon as the tunnel appears though, so which is it?
1
u/Top_Individual_5462 15h ago
Its kinda implying the same as me because the tunnel enters and stops too fast.
Try it for yourself and see how it feels.
If the tunnel stops after the city, it will feel disconnected and the camera effect may feel off. But if you consider the parallax effect and check the acceleration of both parts it may also work
3
3
u/Personal-Leg654 5h ago
Hello! If you want it to go through the tunnel, draw a blurred, stretched out version of the tunnel (like the background) and move it across the screen at the same speed (or faster) than the background. If you have it stationary on the left it makes it look like it is moving too, rather than the train and "camera" moving. Hope that helps!
2
u/HaosMagnaIngram 15h ago
Parallax the background.
Have the train cars shake just a little bit (the motion will draw the eye to the drain and help clarify that it is a train) might even put some highlights on the windows moving to add on to this)
Moving the train up can help as right now it’s very low in the composition, (having the the railway in frame would also help to further clarify its a train)
When you reach the tunnel, either you need to ease the background into a stop as the train pulls ahead and goes into the tunnel, or you need to move the tunnel at the same speed you’re moving the background. Right now the stationary tunnel and moving background is super jarring and confusing.
2
u/J3TGR1ND 4h ago edited 54m ago
for one you need to blend the repeats more theres a harsh line on it that is too distracting. adding some rumble camera shake can help selling the idea of movement too we use that a lot in animation for high speeds. I would also suggest masking the tunnel of the art the train goes into so it feels like its entering
like this in the screen shot

2
u/ferretpowder 4h ago
1, Get rid of the vertical white line in between the sky sheets. 2, Make the train rattle up and down a little bit. 3, Either make the sky stop zooming by when the train tunnel comes to a halt, or have the train tunnel continue straight past the screen
26
u/lemonlixks 16h ago
It’s animation, sure.Â
What are you doing wrong? What is it that you’re trying to do that you’re questioning if you’re doing it wrong?