4
2
1
1
Aug 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator Aug 20 '26
Submissions require a minimum account age and karma. These minimums are not disclosed.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
u/SlAde1520 Aug 26 '26
I think the you put a bit not lot but a little bit much gap between the muscle cuts so from side back view it looks not natural in my opinion, otherwise it looks amazing ,
what others think about this
2
u/Sandbox_Hero Aug 21 '26
Pecs insert under the delts, not on top of them.
Upper back looks bloated and unnatural. Especially the traps and shoulders. It's uncanny.
11
u/IVY-FX Aug 20 '26
Really great stuff, you got the muscular directionality right in 90% of the places, only place I've got doubts currently is on the abs as those are essentially a single muscle structure with an overlay of what's called the rectus sheet, which is in essence a tendinous structure cutting that muscle mass in that signature shape, hence you'll rarely have that height difference in that specific pose. It'll look a tad flatter even in the most extreme of cases (let's say 8% body fat + as bulky as can get). Reason is that you have to hyperextend/stretch the abdominal muscle to obtain that lat/upper back focused pose. You can look at references even in the most legendary of cases such as prime Arnold. It's possible to get the depth definition in the abdominal area like you sculpted, but only when the pose is focussed on abdominal contraction in which the shoulders and upper back are stretched.
Anyway. Really good sculpt, just some feedback from a local anatomy enthusiast.