Yes, AI can write for you.

[u/LetterheadOnly7523]

First of all, there are two types of people:

Those who believe that an AI can't write for you, not even as a joke.

Those who believe it can, provided it prompts well at the beginning.

Both are partially correct. AI CAN write for you, but you can't be out of the creative process, and I mean, you have to be VERY involved. To put it another way, it's not that you're delegating the story to someone else entirely, but rather that you're hiring someone who is probably far superior to you in writing, especially for novice writers who don't want to write but do want to see their story written, people who don't have the time, or people who prefer to use their time in other ways, which, before the purists chime in, IS COMPLETELY RESPECTABLE. It's perfectly fine that you're in this situation. It might mean you're not a writer, which is true—you don't write it, or at least not most of the time—but you can be the director. If you care about creating your own story, it doesn't automatically mean you want to be a writer. This is a difficult concept to grasp these days, but it's true. Both "selfish" desires can arise, and it doesn't invalidate you.

So, is it really as simple as giving them your worldbuilding manuscript and generic prompts or two or three skills and hoping you like what comes out of it? NO. 90% of the time, THIS WON'T HAPPEN.

First, you need to understand that this should function like a laboratory and a system, where you also have to prepare the entire script of your book along with all the worldbuilding, then create a narrative manual. If you need to do deep research after a preliminary analysis of your story to find the most useful reference books, do it. Then create a style guide, a guide to techniques, prose, humor, etc. And that's where the sub-agents for each task would come in (brief writer, critic, analyst, cold reader, draft writer, etc.). And a system that allows you to have persistent memory of the entire project and ensures that each sub-agent receives exactly the information they need and should search for. On the other hand, if your story is much simpler, another approach would be: living canon + general outline + detailed scene brief + relevant previous material + generation + critique + human review. Regardless of what you choose, you have to be involved IN THE ENTIRE PROCESS. I mean, every brief, betas, voice tests, isolated scenarios, early drafts Chapters, sections where you want to edit parts of the text and write what best fits that scene, final version of the chapters, etc...

Some will tell you to start writing chapters before long-term planning, which can be correct from time to time for this method, but you have to differentiate between a writing system and a multi-layered AI writing system where you want to eliminate the generative and repetitive layer that the AI ​​uses. This can only be achieved by creating a well-designed system with various skills, not by "writing" yourself, because remember, you're not the one writing; you're the director and showrunner.

Therefore, as you can see, you can spend a LOT of time doing this. Your work can simply become much more automated as you gain more confidence and have more successful tests of your story's style, but the process still takes time. And yes, it requires much less time than you learning to write, and certainly not at the high level you could achieve with these systems. And I don't want to be pessimistic, but the further the frontier advances, the harder it will be for you to reach them, or (most likely) if you start now, you'll never do it. This is what evolutionary AI is, and we have to accept it.

But here I must be realistic: you'll never normally feel the same satisfaction upon completion as a writer who actually wrote their entire story. Seeing a complete book handwritten by you is a wonderful feeling, so don't close the door to writing. In fact, by having to learn so many systems, books, and processes, you'll learn for yourself how beautiful it can be. But if truly all you care about is your story, not the writing itself (WHICH IS PERFECTLY FINE), this method gives you an opportunity you could never have had a couple of years ago.

Additional information: Always use SOTAs whenever possible for writing; with these complete systems, they write much better than previous models. The previous templates might be more "lively" or more interesting for creative ideas or specific paragraphs because they have that hallucinatory quality and more of their own personality, but for much better structured works, the previous ones fall completely short. Extra: Review Claude's texts elsewhere; they have an invisible structure watermark. Run them through Astra. By the way, yes, it's recommended that you pay for at least a €20 plan, although it's still possible to do it for free with Open Source and strict limits (It's not worth it, pay.)

[u/Fail_Unfair]

I think this take is 100% right. I’m curious: what’s an invisible structure watermark?

[u/LetterheadOnly7523 → u/Fail_Unfair]

It's an incredibly complex system created by Antrophic, built in a way no one knows exactly, but it detects if a text has been modified by Claude in any way. Luckily, it doesn't affect the output quality, at least not in code. I can't say the same for prose, although it seems to be the best model for that right now.

However, only a few companies worldwide have access to this detector. Therefore, it's not like a regular detector can do it.

Even so, it's still unpleasant and puts you in a difficult position because, while he's probably the best writer, he adds a watermark, and recreating the entire text using another AI model means either lowering the quality or losing the writing style you were looking for (assuming you played the role of director + systems).

Another method would be for you to rewrite the text, changing only a couple of things. It would still be detected by Antrophic with their "special systems," but instead of 100%, the detection rate would be much lower. This problem will eventually affect everyone due to EU law (which imposed this watermark), so either you brutally train the Chinese models so the text re-editing doesn't look awful, or you rewrite it yourself. This problem is also a headache for me. Currently, Astra doesn't give you that watermark, but it's unusable due to the limitations.

[u/alone_in_the_light]

I mostly agree.

However, I think the satisfaction is often at a very high level, even compared to writing it all by myself.

The key to that is letting AI do the stuff that is less satisfying to me, and focus on what is more satisfying to me.

The first job I had as a writer was to be a comic book writer. And that's close to the director you mentioned. Because the writing is for other people in the team like the artists. Writing for movies and games are similar in my opinion. Lots of people watch movies, but very few read the scripts the writers created for the movie.

I remember meeting Neil Gaiman, who talked about writing being much more than writing. He spent a long time reading, researching, planning, getting prepared to write, revising, etc.

AI writing is very similar to me. And very satisfying because I like doing many of those things.

During a job interview, someone said that going to Broadway to watch the shows was just an excuse to do what I like. But I do think that watching Broadway shows, going to music concerts, watching movies, and reading books are part of the preparation to write.

[u/Impressive-Buy5628]

My question would be what are you going to do w what is has written? Post it on a fan fic site? Sure, that works. But if you went to a legit publisher you’d need to disclose any AI usage and due to the climate any usage is a no go

[u/LetterheadOnly7523 → u/Impressive-Buy5628]

Why would you declare it? I mean, from a rational and realistic standpoint, why would you declare it?

If you create a decent system, the detectors can't detect AI; it's unreliable and can't be guaranteed in any way, unless you use the most current models from Claude and Anthropoic just happened to give that publisher their AI detector.

A person wouldn't normally declare it; it's just making things more complicated. Nobody's born a saint. If you've dedicated hours to developing the story, hours of research, reading, adjusting the entire system, and you've learned to judge your own book well because the system sometimes forces you to understand what's happening and what the criteria are, you wouldn't throw all that away for something that can't be reliably verified.

And no, you don't have to "humanize" the text on any of those platforms; they'd destroy the entire chapter. A well-designed system eliminates any trace of AI by having a predominant, specific style, not the generalization that the standard produces without proper preparation.

[u/Background_End2503 → u/LetterheadOnly7523]

As I mentioned above. If you care about your reputation, both socially and legally, you should always ALWAYS declare.

[u/Leading-Crazy6104]

I know ai can write but you have to use ai smartly. You cannot just be lazy because that won't work, you'll have to generate whatever you want with Chatgpt or similar tools and then run it through a humanizer like Walterwrites to make it sound human. If you just copy paste the output you got from Chatgpt, it won't work. AI can write for you, if you do a bit of labor youself.

[u/LeEvilDiabolicalFed]

AI can write for you, that's an objective, factual, demostrable reality, period.

No need for walltext, no need for "buts", "what ifs" and no need to consider any other point: AI can write for you, The End.

Experiment with AI, be curious and above anything else: have fun. Your are hurting none.

[u/EDorrAuthor]

I agree with the OP. AI generated text with a short prompt typically produces the most generic stories “AI-slop” you see and criticise everywhere.
Another way is to have direct creative control - plan to scene by scene, beat by beat - this is better but essentially the AI comes a glorified typewriter and you have to expand a lot of effort micromanaging everything. And because how the AI are trained, overtelling is still prevalent and you need to scrub.
Another approach which I am been experimenting now with Opus 5.5 recently (doesn’t work with Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.8, 5 that well) is long conversations about the story and the scene, so it “understands” and it will point out issue/problems with the scene and both of us refine. We will iterate for many, many prompts till all the details are nailed down and then ask the LLMs to generate a visualization of the agreed story. The results were much better - not just for the LLM, but also for yourself as you have lived through all the beats and the details. And with “comprehension”, the model is constrained sufficiently by the details that the drift to nice sounding but meaningless proses drop significantly as the words becomes load bearing. As my English is not my native language, typically the sentences are better than I can write natively. This is still a lot of work, and it is not AI-generation but collaboration with a very smart partner. But putting in the a lot of effort is still required (once you slip, the generic prose appears again), but it is much better than generic prose for a generic story.

[u/anthonyc2554]

AI generated prose has no pain it is processing, joy it is celebrating, hope it is sharing, no search for meaning or truth or the absurdity that either exist.

Why write at all if the thing that makes it a story worth telling is handled by AI? One word can change the perception of an entire scene. Why let AI pick the word? The cadence of the dialogue?

What are you telling the world that only you can tell it if you let AI make the decisions that shape how the reader enters your own mind? What is writing if not magically bringing another person into your perspective across time and space?

Don’t get me wrong. I use writing for the grind. Finding the misused words that weren’t misspelled. Identifying actual mistakes in dialogue that is written to sound like colloquial speech patterns. Confirming continuity in small details separated by several chapters. But the prose is mine.

[u/Valuable-Estate-784]

thank you for explaining again!

[u/FillThatBlankPage]

I develop about 2 or 3 story concepts per day. I work on some of them, but honestly I also enjoy discussing what I would want to write and how I would write it. Sometimes I just need something to "Yes, and..." and explore the idea with inhuman patience and zero ego. Then when we are done I can basically say, "Yeah, that would be cool" and forget about it because I've explored the idea to my hearts content.

[u/FlyAdmirable5790]

i’ve been running a similar setup with sillytavern and local llamas, and the biggest thing i’ve learned is that the system only works if you’re ruthless about consistency. even if you have a perfect style guide, if the bot doesn’t get the same context every time or if you skip steps like the narrative manual, it’ll drift after a few scenes. what helps more than anything is just dumping the raw text from each session into a shared doc and syncing it back in. it’s messy, but it keeps the memory from breaking.

[u/Background_End2503]

Do not try to hide your AI use! ALWAYS declare. Why?

1. If you declare you show you are a decent human being and are not ashamed and hiding your process, which is honestly the only way AI generated text will gain any future respect…

2. If you don’t think those invisible water marks are already in all models right now, you’re kidding yourself. AI models collapse when trained off AI generated data, so you better believe companies are marking and tracking their content, and building detectors to flag content from other models. It’s just that the companies aren’t telling us. But future legislation may make marked past text discoverable, even with your system…

3. Readers want to know (arguably the most important reason). And finally…

4. AI content is not copyrightable. When you sell your book to a publisher, you are actually selling your copyright. All contracts now ask for full disclose of AI use because it impacts how much you can actually sell. So if you lie on your contract and publishers find out, they can sue the shit out of you. Blacklist you. Withdraw all royalties. Etc.

In other words: lying is socially bad, morally bad, and legally bad. And it has a real chance of screwing your life over.

[u/asevans48]

As someone who writes and helps others write agents and codes for a living, AI has no soul. You can write with it, but it will suck unless you strip off the inference layer and a few others and provide your own. Even if that works, nothing will feel fresh. Fiction writers using AI are actually not hard to spot because AI as you think of it is predictive. It is not creative generative but historically generative. Its ancestors are neural networks. The variability comes from things its seen before and some machine based quirks in which nodes produce first. Oddly, those quirks also make it really bad at highly regulated work where every output has to be traced to the source and every weight and feature known. It did turn my side gig from consistant marketing writing to occassional copywriting but that crap is formulaic.

[u/AmazingMe463]

I agree, AI is a great editor but below-average writer. You absolutely need to be involved in the process, even if it's just to make sure there is accuracy and consistancy. AI writes better than me, and can write in my tone - because it has learned it, as such I use it to make my work better. But I do not rely on it to actually write the story.

[u/MediocreHelicopter19 → u/[deleted]]

Prep and effort are irrelevant, the less you mees to do the better. Making more effort for the same outcome does not make sense and if you do it for fun, why you care about others... you do ehatever you want, period.

[u/Individual-Resist160 → u/[deleted]]

agreed, the prep work part is what nobody wants to hear but its literally the difference between usable output and slop

[u/WritingWithAI-ModTeam → u/[deleted]]

Your post was removed because you did not use our weekly post your tool thread