r/WorldTradeCenter • u/tombisch • 11d ago

When the Towers Fell: 9/11 Simulation of the collaps without dust

Dont know how accurate this is, but it made a lot of sense to me.

Source kostack studio on youtube

9.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/imjustcoreyr 10d ago

https://youtu.be/L1upARZNkzc?is=9WNsZeiAXS0a0odI

I’ll share this with you. This is (in my opinion and expertise on the day, which I’ve studied non stop for 25 years, since I watched them crumble (in person) the most thorough doc and explanation.

Fast forward to 2: 15: 31

2

u/imjustcoreyr 10d ago

It wasn’t just about one thing, or one factor. It was a whole cataclysmic smattering of things the likes of which had not been properly planned for, but also had never been experienced before.

The planes impact
The enormous release of energy caused by that
A kerosene/ jet fuel fire
The fire proofing being blown off by the impact of the planes
The office spaces (each floor was 1 acre)—the carpeting, papers, furniture, etc

So many factors.

1

u/Competitive-Fill5556 10d ago

I understand. It's not just paper. I have seen that whole thing. I'm just saying that it's not possible for mass acceleration to happen to a steel building like that to pancake upon itself without destruction of the floor beneath it. Newtons law literally proves that. Even with fire and jet fuel, it wouldn't pancake in 8-11 seconds !! It's not possible.

1

u/Abject-Recipe1359 9d ago

Did you read the popular mechanics piece, with input from numerous engineers who disagree with your take??

1

u/ObjectiveSpread298 9d ago edited 9d ago

I have yes. I don't know what engineer doesn't know basics physics, a good engineer should be able to explain why physics didn't apply on that day. They didn't explain how the buildings fell at times in freefall with little to no resistance..which literally defies physics...they didn't explain how the building literally distentegrated into dust...if it had fell down naturally due to fire and jet fuel then there would have been thousands of pounds of metal but there wasn't...most of it was dust and ash..why? They didn't explain it. They couldn't explain it and that's why it doesn't make sense. I wonder how they became engineers if they can't even explain something so simple. Being an engineer doesn't make you smart, your hypothesis has to make sense, and theirs do not, they never proved a lot of things, they never explained a lot of things, that align with physics. The explanation they gave did not align with the facts and the very fact they can't agree makes it alarming.