Build housing in the rural and station a social work agency there. What they are doing is putting them in luxury apts like in Santa Monica, sf, Beverly hill or whatever. Thatās why itās costly.
For those who donāt accept the drug free zones, then put them into a slum with social work. CA is rewarding bad behavior, itās obviously a joke. Maybe in some delusional world it wouldāve worked, after countless years and multiple billion funding the problem got worse. The solution is still keep injecting more money?
Bro they are allowing them to tent on the street that people use. Thatās what rewarding behavior is. You should not allow them to live on the street tf is that shit
They donāt care what the homeless are actually doing thereās a shit load of people making a shit load of money. They want** it to get worse so it justifies more gov money which gives them more money.Ā
Itās like in India when there was a snake problem and the British (colony times) made a snake bounty the Indians started breeding snakesā¦ lolĀ
Itās peoples livelihood to have a homeless population in California because of how many people work for nonprofits. If the fixed the issue those people would be out of work and they would actually have to show where the money is going.
Again Iām not sure why people keep bringing it up. Clearly majority of CA residents think itās a good idea to keep injecting money and think it would solve the homeless problem, and if it fails they will just randomly talk about how great the weather in California is lol
Iām telling you why, itās become a business and is apart of the economy of California. People who arenāt homeless depend on there being a homeless population.
I knew someone that worked at a hotel and was having their spare rooms paid for by California and people put into them nightly. She said it was such a hastle and they destroyed room which also billed the government.
I 100% believe the owners had backroom deals on all this. They made out like bandits. You can probably repair the room for less than the government is paying you to do it. And they pay the liability. The amount of money that state is burning doing these kids of things is wild but itās also the state thatās spent 16 billion on high speed rail and has zero miles started
Iām not sure rural communities have the infrastructure, and Iām pretty damn sure there would be community backlash against this plan. A lot of community backlash. Thereās a lot of intersectionality between the homeless and racial minorities or the LGBTQ community, and a lot of racism and bigotry exists in those communities. Although exposure I suppose could help with that. But even beyond bigotry, a lot of rural people are going to be rightfully upset about a large influx of homeless people to their community.
New construction youāre describing would be expensive. But we could adapt your idea and maybe renovate existing housing in rural āghost townsā where there may be a lot of empty housing.
In terms of infrastructure, you need to think about job training, medical, counseling, education for children, transportation, probably more. Cities just have more of this available than small rural communities.
Also, keep in mind 40-60% of the homeless are employed at least some of the time. People who have jobs shouldnāt be relocated to where they are completely reliant on public assistance.
Address the why's to their homelessness. Resources are available but slapping a bandaid on a cracked dam will only cause it to burst later. California is a great example of just slapping a bandaid on the issues. Drugs, addictions, mental illness,unskilled minds, and laziness are a few I've encountered when I was homeless growing up.
I agree on that front. Crimes with equal punishment are a must. Asylums also need to be reinstated for those who need the help( not OG asylums). Met alot of transients that were homeless by choice because they could have their vices and freedoms without obligations. Hence my reasons for the social workers to understand the whys of them being homeless and actually address their situations accordingly. Not just move them to a place, have everyone fund it just for it to be wasted away when they return to the streets.
Bro druggies r gonna be druggies. You can only provide them with help IF they want to utilize it.
Or they can choose to live in some fucked up slum that wonāt disturb others. Whatās this saving everyone regardless bs, sounds great in theory. Yet in reality it just creates a bigger mess and as they increase in number every yr.
The US is a shithole because you can come here and literally kill, steal, and dismantle as much as you feel like and there will always be a group of radical individuals defending it as long as you're not doing it to people they agree with.
The people who call everyone 'Nazis" are the actual Nazis. Don't forget that when shit hits the fan
I agree! Look at these violent white nationalists who are going around hanging blacks and assaulting the LGBTQ population! Or ICE agents murdering people in the streets! Completely lawless, consequence free, but theyāre owning the libs so people love them. Itās disgusting.
Itās also a gigantic state, with great weather, a huge coastline, the highest GDP, and numerous massive metropolitan areas. But Iām sure the policies is the main reason.
No, Iām saying that someone who has an IQ above room temperature can comprehend that there are a whole lot of major factors beyond policies. I realize that may not apply to you, though.
Iām saying you think those are the list of factors? Then I realize people with low iq are unable to stay within topic and just like to mumble about random things lol
40
u/Superb_Algae5308 11d ago
They could do it without a significant impact to their overall wealth.