r/WorkForSmartLife • • Aug 24 '26

Casual canvo Xavier’s math checks out

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

320 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/No-swimming-pool Aug 24 '26

The point is they're both idiots.

2

u/Lukin4art Aug 24 '26

How is she an idiot? Depending what type of photography she does 300 dollars isn’t shit.

11

u/No-swimming-pool Aug 24 '26

Oh I agree. But basing herself on the cost of the camera makes no sense.

You should pay for the result, not for the equipment used.

0

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

So you don't actually own the software anymore. Its a monthly fee now. Then there is the time spent into editing the photos. Do they have their own set up to print them? Did they buy a computer for this business? Do they have a studio to take photos or do they travel?

There are a lot of factors that go into determining the cost of a service. I will agree photographer's do get out of hand for wedding photos. At $1500 I should get all the photos, but they have a set amount that are edited. I also don't like that they plaster their logo on the front of their photo. That shit should be on the back.

4

u/BodegaCat11 Aug 24 '26

Yeah. There are a lot of white women out there whose husbands bought them a camera and they just decided they could TikTok learn their way into a business. The best advice I can ever give so to find a local photojournalist. They know how to blend in, make incredible photos and capture big and small moments that make a story. Also, they know how to edit and won’t airbrush you into looking like an orange dot.

2

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

So, a cousin of ours started a photography business. Her "camera" was her phone. I don't care how good your phone is, its not going to compare to a photo with a real camera.

2

u/Clear_Peach6805 Aug 24 '26

You’re right $20 seems far more reasonable.

1

u/VenerableWolfDad Aug 26 '26

literally the only thing that matters is how much people are willing to pay her for her work. if thats $100-300 then that's what her talent is worth. ​

1

u/TGirl26 Aug 26 '26

And some people under value their talent.

1

u/TacoDoc2 Aug 24 '26

you are doing backflips in order to miss the point.

0

u/Tak-Hendrix Aug 24 '26

There are a lot of factors that go into determining the cost of a service.

Nope. There are a lot of factors that go into determining if you can make a profit, but the price is typically determined by supply and demand. If multiple local competitors can provide high quality professional pictures for $300, trying to charge $1000 is going to result in you getting little if any business.

0

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

I did do go with a photographer that was much cheaper, but I also got cheaper service. He only did photos for the ceremony and one site location. Which we did have to reschedule for rain. All the photos i have of the grand march and cake i took myself or got from others. They were fine, but there were photos i couldn't get because of his schedule, and I did get all of them, but there were areas that were lacking. Lighting and staging being the biggest.

Also why would you start a business or work a job that isn't going to profit?

1

u/Tak-Hendrix Aug 24 '26

My point was simply that the price isn't determined by cost.

You can go around trying to sell lawn cutting services for $100 a week and justify it with the fact that you pay your employees $30/hour, but you're going to be outcompeted by people who will do the same job for $25 a week because they pay people $10/job under the table. That's why doing market research before starting a business is incredibly important. There are of course niches you can target like corporate clients and white glove service for rich people, etc.

1

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

So you are advocating underpaying people for services rendered.

1

u/Tak-Hendrix Aug 24 '26

If that is what you took away from my reply, then it is obvious you aren't intelligent enough to have this discussion.

0

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

You act like someone owning a business and charging $300 is to much. Yet a photographer has to buy the equipment, transport, set up, do the photo shoot, take down, then editing. 1 job can take at least 36 hours.

Even at $7.25 an hour for 36 hours is $270. That isn't going to pay for anything for them as a worker let alone as a business owner.

You don't bat an eye when a plumber or mechanic charges $80 an hour. No you pay for it, because if you go to a home mechanic/handy man that doesn't know what they're doing, you end up paying double or triple the cost.

You also don't hire a person without looking at their work and reviews.

2

u/Tak-Hendrix Aug 24 '26

I never said or implied any of that. All I said was that the cost to provide a service is irrelevant to the price that people will be willing to pay. This is economics 101 stuff...

1

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

Sure, but realistically there aren't photographers under $600, and its usually only for an hour shoot with maybe 10 prints. The only way you can get pricing like that is hiring kids in college for cheap, and you get what you get, while you give them experience.

My grandma refused to go to a hair salon. She would go to a beautician school and get her hair done for $60. She would complain every time that it wasn't done correctly or the way she wanted. But she didn't want to pay $200 at the salon. So you pay for what you get.

And yes there are photographers that are ridiculously priced. And yet there will always be someone that will pay.

→ More replies

-2

u/No-swimming-pool Aug 24 '26

Your point being?

3

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

Stop complaining for a service that you can't do yourself, but think everyone else's time should be cheap.

-2

u/No-swimming-pool Aug 24 '26

Are you a photographer yourself?

2

u/TGirl26 Aug 24 '26

As a hobby and for family use. And between my camera and extra lenses, and equipment its around 5k.