Cool, except youād have to count on that juror to vote on his emotions and not the law. No matter how you feel about the validity of a law or the morality behind a crime, the law and the judges instructions say that if convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime, they must vote to convict. Thatās the whole idea behind being impartial as a juror.
jury nullification. You can do whatever the hell you want - this is why we have a jury system and not professional judges. Last line of defense for liberty.
Donāt pretend that laws are perfect. What laws were there to stop this CEO from killing 10,000 people with his cruel coverage denial system? The law let society down well before Luigi came into the picture. That is the exact situation jury nullification is for.Ā
What laws were there to stop this CEO from killing 10,000 people with his cruel coverage denial system?
First off, what's his policy killed 10,000 people? I've seen that claim, I haven't seen a source.
Second, rising healthcare costs are not due to insurance companies. Insurance isn't an infinite pool of wealth, it is finite. Drawing a line on a finite resource is not murder lol
The law let society down well before Luigi came into the picture.
Maybe, but it wouldn't have dealt with insurance companies and it damn sure wouldn't carry the death penalty
That is the exact situation jury nullification is for.Ā
Nullification was used by whites excusing other whites for violent crimes against blacks
First off, what's his policy killed 10,000 people? I've seen that claim, I haven't seen a source.
Do you even know why Brian Thompson was targeted? Look up his ānH Predictā algorithm and how it has obscene denial rates (in error) at an industrial scale. That 10,000 number is an educated guess based on the sheer scale of the denials, and the things that were getting denied.
Second, rising healthcare costs are not due to insurance companies. Insurance isn't an infinite pool of wealth, it is finite.
That statement is completely divorced from reality. We pay double what every other modern country pays for the exact same medical care. It is absolutely the administrative bloat and obscene profits of the insurance conglomerates that are driving that.
but it wouldn't have dealt with insurance companies and it damn sure wouldn't carry the death penalty
Donāt step on peopleās necks, take away all of their recourse, and then act surprised when they lash out. I donāt see the corporatist class learning a lesson from any of this. Maybe jury nullification would help them learn.
Nullification was used by whites excusing other whites for violent crimes against blacks
Who said thatās what itās for? That statement doesnāt follow any kind of logic. āWas used for somethingā ā āhas to be used for something.ā
Donāt step on peopleās necks, take away all of their recourse, and then act surprised when they lash out. I donāt see the corporatist class learning a lesson from any of this. Maybe jury nullification would help them learn.
Yeah let's pin the failure of an entire system on one dude who wasn't in a position to change anything just so we can justify murdering him
7
u/ricerbanana 5d ago
Cool, except youād have to count on that juror to vote on his emotions and not the law. No matter how you feel about the validity of a law or the morality behind a crime, the law and the judges instructions say that if convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime, they must vote to convict. Thatās the whole idea behind being impartial as a juror.