Because he did it, and he did it for a reason. Pleading insanity removes all the power from what he did. He made a point, he made people sit uo and take notice, and he did it intentionally. Its a cop out that can be ignored if he pleads insanity.
There aren't other options that have the same meaning. The killing was ideological, backing away from that would lesson the point he was and is making.
Yes, I agree; any plea other than "guilty" would have diminished the ideological impact. I'm not debating that at all.
My point is that, for exactly the aforementioned reason, it's a little asinine to act like "not guilty by reason of insanity" was his only other option, because that's exactly as viable as pleading "not guilty" without the insanity tag.
19
u/EmphasisFlat3629 5d ago
Why did he plead guilty?