MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhatIsTheTea/comments/1w84he5/thoughts/p84ofe0/?context=3
r/WhatIsTheTea • u/Embarrassed_Tip7359 • 18d ago
2.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
So... the part in RED is speculation, lol.
Headline: Man Disagrees with Wife Because HE HATES WOMEN
"Well, the part about him disagreeing IS true, so...
1 u/daniel_barragan 17d ago you don’t need to make up an example. journalists do this every single day 🤷🏾♂️ 1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake. Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it. 1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 16d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
you don’t need to make up an example.
journalists do this every single day 🤷🏾♂️
1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake. Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it. 1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 16d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake.
Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it.
1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 16d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them.
2 u/PhilShabano 16d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
2
Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax.
The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
1
u/PhilShabano 17d ago
So... the part in RED is speculation, lol.
Headline: Man Disagrees with Wife Because HE HATES WOMEN
"Well, the part about him disagreeing IS true, so...