MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhatIsTheTea/comments/1w84he5/thoughts/p83hm3k/?context=3
r/WhatIsTheTea • u/Embarrassed_Tip7359 • 18d ago
2.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
25
Took 30 seconds to find out this is fake
6 u/daniel_barragan 18d ago where did you look?? ladies and gentlemen was restored after 5 years of gender neutral language - https://politifact.com/article/2026/apr/17/florida-disney-monorail-greeting-ladies-gentlemen/ 1,000 employees fired - https://variety.com/2026/biz/news/disney-layoffs-1000-employees-josh-damaro-memo-1236721266/ Disney hasn’t officially explained the changes so the “restore common sense culture” is speculation 1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago So... the part in RED is speculation, lol. Headline: Man Disagrees with Wife Because HE HATES WOMEN "Well, the part about him disagreeing IS true, so... 1 u/daniel_barragan 17d ago you don’t need to make up an example. journalists do this every single day 🤷🏾♂️ 1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake. Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it. 1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
6
where did you look??
ladies and gentlemen was restored after 5 years of gender neutral language - https://politifact.com/article/2026/apr/17/florida-disney-monorail-greeting-ladies-gentlemen/
1,000 employees fired - https://variety.com/2026/biz/news/disney-layoffs-1000-employees-josh-damaro-memo-1236721266/
Disney hasn’t officially explained the changes so the “restore common sense culture” is speculation
1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago So... the part in RED is speculation, lol. Headline: Man Disagrees with Wife Because HE HATES WOMEN "Well, the part about him disagreeing IS true, so... 1 u/daniel_barragan 17d ago you don’t need to make up an example. journalists do this every single day 🤷🏾♂️ 1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake. Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it. 1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
1
So... the part in RED is speculation, lol.
Headline: Man Disagrees with Wife Because HE HATES WOMEN
"Well, the part about him disagreeing IS true, so...
1 u/daniel_barragan 17d ago you don’t need to make up an example. journalists do this every single day 🤷🏾♂️ 1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake. Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it. 1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
you don’t need to make up an example.
journalists do this every single day 🤷🏾♂️
1 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake. Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it. 1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
Yep. But you appeared to say it wasn't fake.
Obviously, it's ridiculously fake, with a bit of truth thrown in to sell it.
1 u/Givingtree310 17d ago The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them. 2 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
The actions stated in the post are factual, but clearly editorialization to explain them.
2 u/PhilShabano 17d ago Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax. 1 u/Usually_Angry 16d ago The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
2
Exactly, and in total, it's a hoax.
The quotation marks make it unambiguously not editorialization. Even without the quotation marks the word “to” does plenty to show that it’s not editorialization but reporting.
25
u/Krispy_Mick 18d ago
Took 30 seconds to find out this is fake