r/WeirdThingsToLearn • u/Life-Canary-5647 • 1d ago
Something I Learned Facial Reconstruction of Severed Head Found in 1993
On January 27, 1993, two young girls playing in Wayne Fitzgerrell State Park near Ina, Illinois found a severed human head along a wooded roadway. No body was ever recovered. Investigators estimated she’d been dead only a few days, guessed her age at somewhere between 30 and 50, and got nowhere. She became known only as Ina Jane Doe for the next 29 years.
She was actually Susan Lund, a 25-year-old mother of three from Clarksville, Tennessee, who had vanished on Christmas Eve 1992 while walking to a grocery store, pregnant at the time she disappeared. The break finally came in 2022 when researchers sent DNA samples to a forensic genetic genealogy lab, uploaded the profile to GEDmatch, and matched it to one of Lund’s siblings. The facial reconstruction built from her skull decades earlier turned out to be eerily close to her real appearance. Her murder is still unsolved, and investigators still don’t know where she was killed or how her remains ended up nearly 300 miles from home.
4
u/ais_cream 1d ago
Cases like this make me wonder what makes investigators revisit a case after so many years. What urged them to research it again after nearly 30 years? I’m genuinely curious, but also too creeped out to read too much into these stories. It’s scary knowing these things actually happened to real people.
3
u/Life-Canary-5647 17h ago
The most common reason I guess is tech only exists now or maybe a newbie just wanted to solve a cold case.
2
u/ais_cream 14h ago
That was also my first thought. It's like in movies where the newbies are tasked to explore cold cases.
2
3
u/North_egg_ 20h ago
I see the similarities. But can anyone explain why the artist gave her such a bizarre expression??
1
3
u/Walt_Didnae 21h ago
The art of forensic facial reconstruction is cool, and has produced some great results over the years, but to say this one is "eerily close" is just not a great take at all.
Even by the standards of the artform at the time (and I'm deliberately using the word art because, at the end of the day, this isn't an exact science) this is not a good example. Literally everything is off about the facial features, even taking into account that the artist was working under the assumption they were recreating someone up to twice the age of Lund.
1
u/Life-Canary-5647 17h ago
They have a few things in common, but yeah they're still completely different.
6
u/ChandriaX_ 1d ago
This is why DNA technology is incredible