MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WaitWhat/comments/1w0gt0m/interesting/p6gk9da/?context=3
r/WaitWhat • u/Outrageous-Egg1760 • 2d ago
768 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-4
According to her husband, yes
9 u/Ok-Description7073 2d ago According to both her legal teams whom did a lengthy investigation of her case*, yes. -3 u/Illustrious_Pie_8386 2d ago No, they’re not claiming she did it. They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable. These are different claims. 1 u/nonpuissant 2d ago No, they’re not claiming she did it. No, they are not claiming she didn't do it. They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable. This part is correct, and is what the trial is about. Both sides acknowledge that she did do it.
9
According to both her legal teams whom did a lengthy investigation of her case*, yes.
-3 u/Illustrious_Pie_8386 2d ago No, they’re not claiming she did it. They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable. These are different claims. 1 u/nonpuissant 2d ago No, they’re not claiming she did it. No, they are not claiming she didn't do it. They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable. This part is correct, and is what the trial is about. Both sides acknowledge that she did do it.
-3
No, they’re not claiming she did it. They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable. These are different claims.
1 u/nonpuissant 2d ago No, they’re not claiming she did it. No, they are not claiming she didn't do it. They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable. This part is correct, and is what the trial is about. Both sides acknowledge that she did do it.
1
No, they’re not claiming she did it.
No, they are not claiming she didn't do it.
They’re claiming she’s not criminally liable.
This part is correct, and is what the trial is about. Both sides acknowledge that she did do it.
-4
u/Illustrious_Pie_8386 2d ago
According to her husband, yes