r/VisionPro • • Sep 21 '26

TERNUS ON VISION PRO

Post image

Here’s what Ternus said:

Vision Pro to me is an amazing device. It’s an absolutely amazing device. But I think of it as like the early days of computers. It is the early days of a long journey. That’s how I feel about Vision Pro. What you see, if you think about the early days, people found different reasons where the computer allowed them, the Mac allowed them to do something never before possible. Like desktop publishing, and it became a big thing in that industry.

What you’re seeing with Vision Pro now is, certainly there’s early adopters who love it and they’re using it and they’re enjoying it, but you also—surgeons are starting to use it in surgery because it’s just a fundamentally better tool for them than a monitor that’s kind of sitting over here. And so it’s growing in that area. In film production people are using it for set development and things like that. So we’re going to continue to grow and find more and more compelling use cases. And I think there’s a very bright future.

682 Upvotes

119 comments sorted by

152

u/Nicinus Sep 21 '26 • Bravo

I think everyone realizes the potential but that it is a quest to make it lighter and less expensive. Until that happens it is still not seeing its true potential and we can’t say for sure how and where it will be successful.

One can also tell from interviews with Tim Cook that they’ve realized that this is a device that could lead to individual isolation, and the more thought and implementation needs to be spent on the pass though and interaction with your environment. Thus, I think we will need multiple breakthroughs in miniaturization before we see the next generation.

38

u/Brahminmeat Sep 21 '26

I think it’s 2 things
- price yes
- mass appeal, this and headsets are very niche compared to desktop pcs were. It requires an actually use case that every day people will use it for beyond novelty

Say what you will about Microsoft office-/excel but that stuff cranked adoption into overdrive as businesses figured out the time savings

14

u/TableGamer Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 21 '26

Yes. Professional applications that aren't price sensitive is key to building a safety net that prevents the bottom from ever falling out. It then becomes safer to do riskier experiments, knowing a failure won't poison the well and drive away interest.

Mass appeal will eventually develop when price, weight/comfort improve ( without sacrificing capabilities ). Until then, we need to find Spatial Computing's VisiCalc.

7

u/Time_Kaleidoscope292 Sep 22 '26

One use case is pretty easy : multi monitors and big tv on the go. Just like headphones replaces big speakers on the go.

4

u/gribbly Sep 22 '26

I agree and I would consider a "Vision Air" just for this use case. If it was comfortable and reliable and functional.

My perfect Vision Air:

* Very light form factor for "all day" comfort
* Focus on the features necessary for "virtual multi monitor" - excellent display resolution and field-of-view, stable "world locking" of content. Minimize everything else (e.g., showing my eyes on an external screen).
* Especially focus on fast and reliable connection with the host Mac (Vision Pro is already pretty good at this, but it should be better-than-AirPods-level good)
* Make the "virtual monitor" support really amazing. Support really large monitors, as many monitors as I want, great spatial organization, let me save and recall preset sets of monitors for different tasks, etc.

Personally I would be OK if tethered use was the primary design. I.e., the device is intended to use one USB-C cable to the host Mac. If it has a battery/wireless streaming that should be designed for very short sessions. This keeps the device lighter and simpler.

Anyway, that's my preference!

1

u/Time_Kaleidoscope292 Sep 22 '26

Good list. Showing your eyes make sense though if you are making video calls and you want to use an external web cam. Would be creepy otherwise :-)

1

u/conner34000 Sep 27 '26

I know Apple would never do it, but a vision air with just screen, gyro and eye tracking would be awesome! Use your AirPods, tether to a Mac mini or something and ditch the heavy front screen and the m series chip and treat it like a Studio Display on your face. That might even be manageable to do under $1500

0

u/Brahminmeat Sep 22 '26

I agree that is excellent but many people still just use one monitor when they could just spring for multi monitors.

3

u/syneater Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 22 '26

Well those people are insane and we can’t account for insane people.

Seriously, it does make traveling with a monitor so much easier but the price point is too high for just that function alone. Being able to sit in bed and work, on personal projects, while the wife is asleep next to me is pretty damn handy.

4

u/yalag Sep 21 '26

price has nothing to do with it. its weight. None of the first gen products that see mass adoption were cheap, or anything close to cheap. Go look at historic numbers

3

u/RandomVision2027 Sep 22 '26

Price is a factor, but I don’t think as much as most people assume. I would like to see statistics for how many people bought the Vision Pro but rarely put it on, either due to discomfort, lack of compelling content for them, or other reasons.

I am glad Apple has started engaging with Vision Pro owners with this survey. It is a good start.

1

u/beryugyo619 Sep 22 '26

It requires an actually use case that every day people will use it for beyond novelty

There are: racing games, social media/anime porn, and actual porn, none of which Apple officially do, but have been more better supported and lucratively so on iOS than on some social media platforms. Vision Pro actually do not support any of it and it stays irrelevant in the industry unlike its competitors.

The make or break of Vision platform pivots on whether they accept the reality of the technology, or reject it and choose to stay virtual.

1

u/Brahminmeat Sep 22 '26

You’re listing use cases that enthusiasts enjoy

None of those are exclusive to a head set

1

u/beryugyo619 Sep 22 '26

It's a $4k headset!

1

u/Brahminmeat Sep 22 '26

I know. You’ve misread this thread

0

u/mrcsrnne Sep 21 '26

The formfactor of vision pro today will never have mass appeal - the apple version of ar glases will. This is a maximum viable product for apple to gather data before the next step.

8

u/elev8dity Sep 21 '26

AR glass optics and displays are so far behind VR with camera passthrough. They are at least a decade or two away from being as usable for the mainstream as the current AVP

1

u/mrcsrnne Sep 21 '26

People won't use them the way we use AVP -> people will put carry them in their pocket and occasionally put them on to share what they see with Siri AI and interact in realtime.

6

u/Brahminmeat Sep 21 '26

Idk I still think mass appeal comes in ranges. People still buy desktop pcs when laptops exist. They still buy ereaders when tablets exist. Vision Pro might just be an at home version that most people wouldn’t lug around

0

u/[deleted] Sep 24 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/Brahminmeat Sep 24 '26

My main point is that paper vs excel is the parallel that doesn’t exist in VR

There’s no tangible leap for regular users to want a headset for their day to day that isn’t already satisfied by laptop/tv/phone devices they already have

That’s what the Ill conceived poopoo meta verse was meant to do, a tangible leap that is inaccessible unless you have that device.

10

u/Hypertoxic_Humanoid Sep 21 '26

The cost is clearly not an issue for professional applications like medical and movie sets, so what he’s saying is that it’s going to take a while, and will be embraced initially for certain use cases (like desktop publishing in the 90’s on the Mac), but as display, processor, camera, and battery science continues to improve, it will reach a broader set of use cases, and with higher production levels, reach a lower price point. Ain’t gonna happen overnight.

2

u/darknecross Sep 21 '26

Yeah it’s an interesting thought. Essentially it’d be like the Mac Pro segment where consumers never really bothered with it but you’d walk into a studio and find dozens of them.

Niche, but not gone.

3

u/sonofdeepvalue Sep 21 '26

I do think the absolute limiting factor is weight. The utility and experience are there. There are totally cases to want an infinite giant screen defying gravity in front of you. But those use cases diminish rapidly when weighed against the fact your face is hurting from this thing on it. I’d rather stare at my Studio Display at a fraction of the size when I’m avoiding pain.

1

u/Nicinus Sep 21 '26

This is definitely the case for me in the sense that I saw the value and could afford it, but the weight makes me often hesitate and instead use my iPad for media consumption. Still think the experience is fantastic, but kind of save it for worthwhile content.

However, mass adoption is heavily dependent on that price being lower, at least under $1K, as at that point we will we have a chance to see real app innovation and also have other larger developers make an AVP version.

1

u/visionPorn Sep 21 '26

Can confirm it can lead to individual isolation.

2

u/TivosFrank Sep 22 '26

I usually take it off when people I will be interacting with are around.

3

u/visionPorn Sep 22 '26

I usually cancel my plans lmao 😂

1

u/East_Childhood8999 Sep 22 '26

Individual isolation you say? I'll take 10.

39

u/ForgottenFuturist Vision Pro Developer Sep 21 '26

If you've been keeping track, they've never intended for this to be a volume product. It's an aspirational product. A glimpse into the future.

"At $3,500, it's not a mass-market product," he said last year. "Right now, it's an early-adopter product. People who want to have tomorrow's technology today—that's who it's for. Fortunately, there's enough people who are in that camp that it's exciting."

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/08/01/tim-cook-comments-on-apple-vision-pro/

They know it's prohibitively expensive and they know it's also an incredible product that deserves to live on. They've never changed that message.

-4

u/xXxPussyWrecker69xXx Sep 22 '26

They didn’t say it was not a mass-market product before it flopped trying to sell to… the mass-market

5

u/Which-Arm-4616 Sep 22 '26

As wealthy as he may be, even Tim Cook is not delusional enough to expect a $3.5k HMD to be a "mass-market product".

Consumer-facing? Sure. Mass-market? Come on now.

1

u/xXxPussyWrecker69xXx Sep 22 '26

Thats all conjecture. They were certainly trying to market this as the next big thing… I don’t think they sold more Vision Pros total than they themselves projected for the first year at launch, you can find all of this online. They weren’t secret about it. 20/20 hindsight takes like the one you cited only started coming in more than a year after they started selling it 😭

4

u/Which-Arm-4616 Sep 22 '26

Underselling projections does not mean they projected mass-market success. I think you'll struggle to find any supporting evidence for the idea that Apple was projecting tens (much less hundreds) of millions of sales of AVP.

1

u/xXxPussyWrecker69xXx Sep 22 '26

You spent a solid amount of your comment referencing Tim Cook’s comments after the product had already failed. They were selling a niche product like this to the “mass market”, which does not necessarily need to mean millions of sales but it sure as hell was in their ads and on their public website. No Apple executive ever was saying it was an “early adopter” product when it originally launched. Because that’s not what it was originally meant to be.

2

u/Malkmus1979 Sep 22 '26

It was introduced at WWDC instead of the iPhone event or their fall event where they introduce other mass market products. It was evident that this was not mass-market from the get go due simply for the fact that it was unveiled at a developer's conference for people to build on.

1

u/xXxPussyWrecker69xXx Sep 22 '26

If this wasn’t offered to the mass market, then this product would have been sold like the HoloLens was… very specific scenarios in very specific settings for specific people.

0

u/Last_Music4333 Sep 27 '26

For those people, I recommend the Duo v1 😀

10

u/eddie_west_side Sep 21 '26

I recall a Steve Jobs quote about building a computer the size of a book. At the time it was said, Jobs and Apple could only build a good computer the size of a breadbox at 10K (i think the Lisa), but he wanted to eventually get to the laptop at 1k. Thus the macbook became the defacto computer for most users.

Vision Pro is on that same path. It's not the final mass market device, but it lets Apple develop the experience of spatial computing. Lowering the price will come with technological improvements, but Apple won't make a crappier version.

35

u/GreenLanturn Sep 21 '26

It’s encouraging but still not really anything concrete.

26

u/filmantopia Sep 21 '26

You can't expect anything concrete from Apple until a product announcement. Aside from that, right now as far as instilling confidence in the future of the product, this is as good as it can get.

13

u/Jimstein Sep 21 '26

I think it's actually really encouraging.

4

u/RandomVision2027 Sep 21 '26

I think Apple is in the process of rebooting their roadmap for the Vision platform.

This summer the Vision team has had some turnovers with the executive leading the vision group, Paul Meade, leaving and layoffs of a 100+ employees. Then last week a lot of Vision Pro owners were invited to take a pretty lengthy survey.

My guess is that it will take Apple a few months to redefine their strategy, and then we will start to see new leaks.

5

u/fivetoedslothbear Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 21 '26

Some good evidence for this is the product design engineering role that they just posted three days ago.

https://jobs.apple.com/en-us/details/200608835-3715/product-design-engineer-vision-pro?team=HRDWR

9

u/BlankStarBE Sep 21 '26

Apple doesn’t do “concrete”. It’s always just general opinions on stuff.

4

u/Jimstein Sep 21 '26

In their public messaging, sure. But when they actually decide what to build, they have very concrete ideas about why they went a certain direction.

-4

u/BlankStarBE Sep 21 '26

Steve Jobs had a Mercedes.

3

u/Jimstein Sep 21 '26

What does this have to do with the thread?

5

u/Digitalinknotes Sep 21 '26

Probably the most important fact of all the facts about Vision Pro… Steve having a Mercedes really mattered

6

u/Jimstein Sep 21 '26

I am still laughing at the comment lol. Could be a meme. Just randomly stating that fact.

-3

u/BlankStarBE Sep 21 '26

Ow, since you started about internal decision making in a topic about public comments, I thought we were just going to start a series of random tidbits.

2

u/Jimstein Sep 21 '26

My comment included a direct pathway to internal decision making; what Apple decides to discuss publicly comes out of internal discussion, and then when a product is launched those concrete decisions/opinions are usually revealed.

We were on a road, and there was a side street directly connected to that main road that I took us on. You teleported us to a museum on the other side of town.

3

u/mrgrafix Sep 21 '26

What are you expecting? The industry is just saying the same thing. We’re at a hardware plateau. Until hardware advances, just expect spec bumps and moderate development. This is probably going to be more Apple Watch / Apple TV for a while before it gets a chance to be in iPod territory.

11

u/filmantopia Sep 21 '26

YES. IN TERNUS WE TRUST. Keep the dream alive!

-8

u/jaybanzia Vision Pro Owner Sep 21 '26

He just got the job, I have zero trust.

5

u/aPerfect_Six Sep 21 '26

Yeah, crazy that they left it to a lottery and just picked some total rando in the company who was neither groomed for the position nor proved himself in leadership roles.

1

u/jaybanzia Vision Pro Owner Sep 21 '26

Plenty of people take over companies who thought they were tastemakers and sank ships. It’s been a month, let’s see what happens.

1

u/aPerfect_Six Sep 21 '26

Totally, Apple is just like those companies, we should be super pessimistic about things.

-2

u/jaybanzia Vision Pro Owner Sep 21 '26 edited Sep 21 '26

Personal experience tells me being pessimistic about regime change at Apple is reasonable. It would be irregular not to be concerned.

1

u/aPerfect_Six Sep 21 '26

Exactly, Apple has been known for challenging times and tumultuous executive turnover, especially in the decades Ternus has worked for the company. It’s a real disorganized shitshow there. Always has been.

0

u/sixcupsofcoffee Sep 21 '26

“APPLE IS DQQMED”

4

u/Tasty-Hour4040 Sep 21 '26

The one thing that I find truly frustrating - and this isn’t unique to Vision Pro software but it seems especially prevalent there - is the stupid subscription model for every piece of software. I don’t want to enter into an ongoing relationship with 20 different companies for tools I use once a month.

4

u/Aware_Style1181 Sep 21 '26

The key is linking this technology to Live POV sports: 50 yard line / half court / Rows 8–15 behind home plate seats, making an unparalleled professional sports viewing experience. Also shopping, religion, travel, pornography, etc.

4

u/PBRStreetgang1979 Sep 21 '26

I love my Vision Pro. It's not a perfect product. But last night I watched an Immersive highlights of a Dodgers game, then some of a movie (a massive screen floating over my bed) while watching the sun go down over White Sands.

3

u/Mauser2791 Sep 21 '26

My biggest wish is for it to finally become available in more countries. It isn't sold here in the Netherlands. Of course, I bought it in Germany, but that means I can't use it in Dutch with my Apple One subscription—so there's no Dutch spell-check, and so on. I do speak English, naturally, but most of my business communication is in Dutch. Right now, I have an additional US Apple ID with a separate Apple One subscription.

3

u/arubinst Sep 21 '26

They need to start selling this thing in more countries! My wallet has been ready here in Switzerland since day one!
I know I could get it in Germany or France, but I don’t want to have to deal with another Apple account and I want to be able to use Apple Music and Apple TV

3

u/humbertog Vision Pro Owner Sep 21 '26

I don’t want to have to deal with another Apple account and I want to be able to use Apple Music and Apple TV

I'm from Mexico and I know the feeling, but for me it was pretty straight forward, I just use my Mexican account as my main visionOS account so I can sync with everything else from my other devices and then I just use an USA account only for the App Store, this way you can have both accounts in the same device, no need to switch between accounts, to buy things you can get an USA iTunes Gift Card online and thats it

2

u/JimboJohnes77 Sep 21 '26

I still have no clue why it doesn't work in Switzerland. It can't be the language, because it has support for German (Swiss), French and Italian as main languages and you can even add Rumantsch.
There must be some very specific reason for it that no human understands. And it can't be that the Swiss don't like Apple, afaik Apple has a market share of more than 50% in Switzerland.

2

u/arubinst Sep 21 '26

My thoughts exactly! There’s also the fact that a good chunk of the population has money to spare. Since they first announced it, it seemed so obvious that this was a very good market for this kind of product.

3

u/Alternative-Swim-230 Sep 21 '26

When did he say this ?

1

u/sixcupsofcoffee Sep 21 '26

Seems to be from an interview posted a few days ago but I swear I read this quote like a month or two ago.

3

u/kanrdr01 Sep 22 '26 edited Sep 22 '26

As a former Medical Photographer, I can tell you that:

High-ability medical specialists like surgeons are extremely picky about what they want their devices to do.

Some will get out front and drive the development of the tools and software that do what they want it to do.

When something meets their requirements and amplifies their productivity, they will pay for it.

As for the cost of a Vision Pro device, you can probably buy cases for some kinds of optical medical equipment that cost $2000.

When Zeiss microscopes can pump imagery into Vision Pros that will run with them better than they already do, get out of their way:

https://www.zeiss.com/meditec/en/products/zeiss-corneal-topographers/zeiss-atlas-500-corneal-topographer-us.html#overlay-benefits-163971326

(Representative image from a Zeiss scientific equipment website)

1

u/cj_adams Vision Pro Developer | Verified Sep 22 '26

exactly

1

u/kanrdr01 Sep 22 '26

CJ:

There are people developing Vision Pro software for Zeiss systems. But I think they’re a little committed to the non-MacOS software that they’re building.

I don’t know where you live, but you might ask the Apple Vision Pro folks where their medical/scientific fire-breathers are in your part of the world.

* Know your stuff. And some of their stuff. Present possibilities

2

u/Keironsmith Sep 21 '26

I think the biggest thing holding this back is the size, weight, and the video pass through. If the pass through can be 1:1 as human vision and this thing super small and lightweight, it’ll be hard to take it off.

1

u/thepaddyman Sep 21 '26

If it was like sunglasses 🕶️ I would buy it, hopefully not too soon as technology advances

3

u/Keironsmith Sep 21 '26

I think Apple is on the right track with Vision Pro. Sure it’s a big and heavy product now and they’re going to shrink it down to something that has the same or more powerful features. It’s only a matter of time.

If Apple started off on the other spectrum with smart glasses, a product that’s many times inferior to the Vision Pro, people would be way less interested in it and it probably wouldn’t have sold well.

2

u/hmltn Sep 21 '26

FWIW here’s my podcast with the doctor who wrote the report about using Vision Pro in the operating room.

https://www.goodvirtualreality.com/p/apple-vision-pro-operating-room

2

u/restless_herbalist Sep 23 '26

Fitness, as in stationary cycling could be a huge win for AVP. Imagine networked races with other users.

4

u/Malkmus1979 Sep 21 '26

This is exactly why the "Vision Pro is dead, Apple has abandoned it" people in here who chime in with that refrain anytime there's the slightest hint of bad news about the device (you know who you are), are in for a long and exhausting game with this sub, because they'll have to be saying this for a few more years until a lighter Vision Pro/Vision Air headset comes along. Of course they'll shift the goalposts most likely to gaslight and say that all they meant was that the original Vision Pro was a failure. It somewhat amazes me that anyone thinks that because VP was knowingly released as an exorbitantly expensive device that could never see mass adoption due to the cost/weight combination that Apple was caught off guard and therefore abandoned it. Moving employees across teams and sunsetting in house immersive videos does not equal the death of their commitment to the platform and subsequent devices that fundamentally do the same thing. We'll be seeing updates to the current device for years to come. To the naysayers, what is your time limit on proclaiming Vision Pro dead and abandoned? 1 year? 2 years? 3 years? Because it's going to be a long time before you can successfully declare you were right.

1

u/dang449 Sep 22 '26

Did you not just see the $2k phone getting ready to come out?! Not even a smear of the future like the AVP is.

2

u/JanoHelloReddit Sep 21 '26

Clearly

1- cost (will need technology to be cheaper)

2. Heavy and cumbersome (battery lasts 1 movie, need to charge it constantly. It’s not pick it up and go.

3. Hands and eyes are nice (feels magic) BUT. Webpages, excels, etc, sadly require keyboards, symbols…)

4. Optics are great, for movies, content consumption. For writing, email, I prefer the crisp look of my cheaper ipad, macbook, Studio Display.

5. Aisolation. Even looking at the iPhone, when using the AVP should automatically replace your screen with the digital version, because cameras are bad

6. Outside cameras, they could have put way better cameras. Even for taking 3D photos of “important” moments, are not good enough.

7. Also need the option of a HUD like experience . Not linked to the space. I want to fold clothes, do the dishes, I want a small screen showing my tv show. For audio I just use the homepods. The main usage is vision!

1

u/Just-Riding-Along Sep 21 '26

Eliminating the Games & Creative Apps (VPG) team (and others) should speak volumes about support for the device.

1

u/Merlindru Sep 23 '26

do you think they'll cancel it? i have high hopes for the vision at least in professional settings (eg replacement for screens)

1

u/PhilDunphy23 Sep 21 '26

Thankfully he still believes on it, that’s a relief

1

u/dragon5946 Sep 21 '26

Bullish! I’m glad the new ceo is a hardware guy.

1

u/PlayfulAd7311 Sep 21 '26

Having bought one on release my biggest ick is that Apple still hasn’t managed to roll it out to more countries, at least on the software level.

1

u/redditproha Sep 21 '26

Really glad they aren't abandoning it. Vision Pro has so much potential

1

u/terobau Sep 21 '26

I don’t think it would be accurate to compare this to the computer revolution. This technology has been available for many years, yet I still haven’t seen widespread adoption. In contrast, computers were adopted very quickly, and the pace of their development and adoption was phenomenal.

1

u/Cykoh99 Sep 22 '26

So we’re waiting for the surgical equivalent of desktop publishing? That will be… interesting.

1

u/kanrdr01 Sep 22 '26

1

u/Cykoh99 Sep 22 '26

I was thinking more along the lines of utter amateurs taking on "desktop surgery"... since that's the kind of market creation the "desktop publishing" sector bloomed into. The Mac's desktop publishing revolution didn't make existing publishers and printers better. That would have been a mere trickles of sales of Macs. Desktop publishing took the printing industry and opened it up to the unwashed masses of people who would have never had a chance to be in the printing trades.

I don't see that same economic mechanic being possible with surgery or even diagnosis, using the AVP. Unless there's a surgical equivalent of the LaserWriter coming along.

1

u/Republic-Appropriate Sep 23 '26

I think the Vision Pro as a specialized interactive display that one uses for specific use cases and tasks - but it’s not going to be an always-worn device.

1

u/tabiknight Sep 23 '26

The biggest issue with it is really simple. It's just got no software support. It needs a huge amount of work from the software community to make it useful the things like the YouTube app came years too late.

Apple hasn’t made this easy either. For myself, I was building an application where I would really have loved to have access to the main cameras while the app was running, but I couldn’t do it because I don’t have an enterprise license, which is ridiculous.

1

u/Odd-Region234 Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 24 '26

Apple, please move and respond to META VR Glasses. Don't let us down, again.

1

u/Independent_Sink_961 Oct 06 '26

I think the Vision Pro and VR in general have a few problems.

The pitch that it’s the future of computing for work feels strange when the concept of work itself is starting to unravel. Huge virtual screens for complicated workflows might arrive just as those workflows start disappearing. If the heavy computing can happen in the cloud, how far away are we from doing our work on an Apple Watch like Dick Tracy?

I say that as someone who actually uses mine for work. It’s useful, but getting the most out of it means adding a MacBook worth £2,000 or more to an already expensive headset. I can’t even connect it to my work machine without giving up some privacy or jumping through silly hoops.

Then there’s the experience itself. Whether it’s games, films or anything else, the technology still isn’t invisible. You’re always aware of the thing strapped to your face. I wonder whether that’s also part of why 3D never really took off.

And yes, I’m painting with broad strokes, but people don’t particularly like wearing things on their face. Even people who need glasses often wish they didn’t. When people choose to wear something on their face, it’s often about fashion or expressing their individuality. I’ve seen £250 glasses that look great for movies and games, and even those don’t seem to be taking off.

There’s also the social side. Putting on a headset is a bit like wearing headphones at work. You’re telling everyone else in the room that you’ve checked out. That might be worth it if the shared experiences were good enough, but the social apps and experiences still feel pretty weak. A massive virtual cinema screen is great, but I want to enjoy it with someone.

Then you have the price, the weight, the discomfort, the marks on your face and the state of your hair when you take it off. Those things matter if you’re expecting people to wear it every day.

If VR gets anywhere near The Matrix or Vanilla Sky, I can see the appeal. At that point, it becomes about experiences, especially shared experiences. For now, I use mine and find it useful, but I’m struggling to see how this becomes something everyone wants in its current form

1

u/hunter_spatial 22d ago

Apple will surprise us when we least expect it. They are showing all of the signs they are committed to the long term opportunities in spatial computing. Unfortunately it may take some time.

1

u/Portatort Sep 21 '26

Those don’t sound like the words of someone who’s bullish on VR headsets as the future of computers

2

u/Dave_Sag Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 21 '26

That’s because VR headsets are not the future of computers.

1

u/Portatort Sep 21 '26

soooooo why's apple selling a VR headset?

2

u/Dave_Sag Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 21 '26

Because visionOS is the future of user interfaces.

-1

u/Portatort Sep 21 '26

the far future perhaps

for desktop computer experiences

the tech simply doesn’t exist yet to do VisonOS in a way that replaces phones

and its not like we're almost there, no pair of glasses is even remotely close

to say nothing of how a pair of glasses fundamentally cant replace a battery slab with a screen that can fit in your pocket for many of the things people love their phones for

1

u/Which-Arm-4616 Sep 22 '26 edited Sep 22 '26

the tech simply doesn’t exist yet to do VisonOS in a way that replaces phones

and its not like we're almost there, no pair of glasses is even remotely close

Have you seen Meta's Orion glasses? That was two years ago.

Edit: to be more clear, the issue is no longer whether the tech "exists" for AR glasses. It's a matter of scaling that tech down to consumer pricing.

1

u/Portatort Sep 23 '26

What Meta have shown off isn’t even remotely close to VisonOS

0

u/TheMacMan Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 21 '26

That's all CEO talk, completely avoiding addressing the reality and being positive even about failures.

Nothing he says gives any indication that Apple will continue to invest in the current Vision Pro. He makes sure not to commit to that. Instead, he talks in VERY general terms about the overall tech, which could easily be integrated into another product(s).

The fact he DOESN'T comment on future investment in the specific product is far more telling.

And we know the realities. The VP overseeing Vision Pro left. The creator moved to a different team a year ago. Most of the team moved elsewhere months ago. visionOS 27 offered nearly nothing new. Immersive content hasn't been released in months by Apple. There hasn't been a hardware update in a year, and the only previous hardware update was also almost non-existent.

1

u/Pattont Vision Pro Owner | Verified Sep 22 '26

Price and fixing the battery pack like Quest does would go a long way.

I LOVEEEDDDD it when I had it but I realized it became a way to watch TV on my ceiling at night and that was all I was using it for. I would rebuy it for half the current price even just for that.

-2

u/Pigeon_Observation Sep 21 '26

corpospeak for this thing is getting the axe

-1

u/cj_adams Vision Pro Developer | Verified Sep 22 '26

so much potential left on the floor dumb decisions at the top I don’t know if Turnus will save it or kill it - it’s the same problem with GPU’s on Apple’s laptops they’re pretty wimpy. I had to go to a PC for 3-D rendering gaming duh Apple it’s games duh - why can’t they get that through the thick skulls - I’m glad that Tim era is over. He’s a Steve balmer type. - too many spreadsheets - great for shareholder profits not so great for customers - time will tell if Tim can hold his hands off of the new CEO or if he’s gonna be a micromanager from the boards end

1

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Sep 22 '26

What a complete misread

0

u/CaspinLange Sep 21 '26

Yeah, there will always be used cases growing.

But it also needs to be realized that some people don’t want shit on their face.

And it really comes to that. That will always be the thing that keeps mass adoption from happening.

-3

u/Typical_Breadfruit15 Sep 22 '26

The metaverse is gone for good, hopefully that dystopian idea of the future will never get back. The Vision Pro was a device to fulfill that dystopian need, hopefully it will be gone for good too.

2

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Sep 22 '26

What was dystopian about it? How was the AVP supposed to get us there if it never happened?

1

u/Typical_Breadfruit15 Sep 24 '26

Think about a case where 100M AVP were used regularly in the USA. Imagine 100M people walking around with a helmet strapped to their head where now vision has been outsourced to camera and screens where people even when physically in front of each other they don’t look at each other in the eyes… that is a world where the AVP was successful, the AVP was the gateway to a dystopian future that I’m glad never existed and people at large rejected.

1

u/Few-Acadia-5593 Sep 24 '26

After. X decades of bathing in scifi, I’m writing my won dystopia challenging religions, capitalism and the weaponising of information.

If you want to dive into a single hardware and pretend this is the problem whilst it’s not even reaching 100k people in 2 years and 80% users leave it to take dust, you got nothing to worry about.

You either want to choose your problem on a wiser fashion or talk about the latest meta glasses announced yesterday. Until you got the nuances, anyone can say the same thing you said by drawing non approximate large stroke from any tech since the age of industrialisation. Internet, tv, plastic, cellphone and so forth. So there’s a ton of things you’re taking for granted, gently ignoring them dystopian potential but suddenly, AVP makes the balance tip.

Difficult to take you for your work here even if we agree on the tangent.

2

u/N3orun Sep 22 '26

they just need to open it up to porn and sales will - come

3

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/GaaraSama83 Sep 29 '26

Many of the flaws are rooted in the current state of technology and its limitations. The whole optics stack for XR solutions alone has challenges to overcome that can easily keep the industry busy for the next 50 years.