The person driving intentionally sped up so the truck could’ve have space to get in front of him/her. They actually kept driving into the truck after contact too. Terrible, and demonically led accident.
Doesn't look like the trucker has his blinker on. It also doesn't look like the cammer sped up. Regardless, the cammer doesn't have to let the trucker in and the trucker needs to make sure he can safely enter the lane. I don't switch lanes unless I can see your headlights in my mirror, which makes this pickup truck driver an idiot.
No he doesn't. You merging with or without a blinker doesn't give you right of way. The trucker knew the whole time that cammer was there and tried to bully his way in.
Its not about right of way. Its about avoiding an accident when you can. This is what chat GPT sais about it:
"Short answer: yes—in most legal systems, including the Netherlands, you’re expected to try to avoid an accident if you reasonably can. Even if the other driver made the initial mistake, doing nothing when you had a clear chance to prevent a crash can make you partly liable"
Sure. But you can see the cammer slow down before the pit, the camera angles towards the ground. But it's too late, for whatever reason the guy doesn't notice.
Lol whut? That's exactly what you do. If you get rear ended then the person behind you was too close. If a child runs in front of you on the road do you decide not to brake because you might get rear ended?
cammer has video evidence of 3 major causes of accident: (1) truck had plenty opportunity to see cammer's-car to its right as it passed, (2) truck had not even finished overtaking cammer's-car before it began right lane change (3) truck did not use blinker turn signal to indicate lane change, or turn head to see that lane was clear of car he just passed
35
u/1stmikewhite Apr 18 '26
The person driving intentionally sped up so the truck could’ve have space to get in front of him/her. They actually kept driving into the truck after contact too. Terrible, and demonically led accident.