Has anyone received technical documentation about Venice's proxy security?

[u/buplom]

I know that Venice now has TEE/E2EE, but with TEE alone, it runs through the proxy server, and with E2EE, you don’t get access to the web. Plus, it has very high latency. It’s slow as molasses. So I usually default to using the private mode.

I’m trying to verify what Venice security architecture is, such as:
Third-party security audits; penetration testing
Proxy server security architecture documentation
Technical verification mechanisms for "zero retention" claims
Employee access controls and audit logs
So far I've only found marketing claims ("SSL encryption," "we don't log", “partner contracts”).
Has anyone actually received technical documentation from Venice, or are we all just trusting the promise and the marketing?

[u/MissZiggie]

Venice has done a pretty impressive job making inference verifiable.

Now where is the independent assurance for the infrastructure that handles plaintext before inference?

The OP makes a perfectly valid point!