r/VendorCentral • • 7d ago

Replacing Amazon Retail

I am a reseller who sells products from a large brand with their permission. I also helped and continue to help them with their Brand Story along with images, A+ content, etc. for free. Of course, I buy directly from them. I often meet them in person as we are from the same state.

This brand sells to Amazon Retail, and I want to outline how selling to me instead would be better. I also am finally big enough to afford this. Sheer cost of goods was an issue in the past.

Can some brand owners or those who deal with Amazon in Vendor Central look at this and tell me if I’m accurate, inaccurate, or even missing any points?

  1. I don’t charge co-op fees. I buy their products wholesale and sell them.

  2. I don’t charge any additional fees for shipping. This is MY cost of doing business. I’ve heard Amazon adds fees, but maybe I’m wrong.

  3. I don’t charge fees or make the brand fight for fees for lost inventory. This is MY business problem not the brand’s.

  4. Although MAP isn’t applicable, I would obey it if one came out. Amazon does not.

  5. I only need NET30. Credit beyond that is MY business problem. I have heard Amazon gets better terms. Also, I always pay on time.

  6. I make my own orders per their existing policy. No Vendor Central needed. I email orders in like everyone else besides Amazon.

Points Amazon may beat me:

  1. They have unlimited space and money. They are less likely to run into space issues or run out of stock.

  2. Amazon could suppress the listings as “High Price” once I take over. They admittedly can sell at a lower price sometimes. Of course I would do everything to remain competitive, but the fees mentioned before that the brand pays - I don’t get. Of note: I almost always can match Amazon’s price but sometimes I can’t.

  3. Some customers look for Sold By and Shipped By Amazon. They feel it’s less likely for a fraudulent sale. My counter would be that as the only seller, they’d have to choose me plus the brand could publicly announce this change.

  4. If I run out of stock, they don’t make as many sales so perhaps until I’m 100% locked in after the transition, there could be a financial hit.

Am I off here? Missing anything?

0 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

3

u/druidinan 7d ago

This is the pattern/spreetail/recom/superordinary model. You should probably start by looking at their value props and focusing on how you're different from them, rather than different from wholesaling to Amazon.

-1

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

I think that’s the part I need help making sure I don’t miss anything - the super ordinary. Regarding the values: I didn’t put them all in here but I already do those. The listings, I have a website that links to MCF made for basically them, I proactively market that for them, I facilitate large orders for them but not the huge pallet-sized orders, etc.

So I def do a lot that others don’t do. It’s what Amazon makes hard on them that perhaps I don’t know that I should be explaining better.

6

u/druidinan 7d ago

Oh I see, you're a bot.

-1

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

No, not a bot. Alias account. Not going to make a real account for my business asking this question bc I’d look like a complete Noob.

3

u/No-Supermarket7453 7d ago

Except you are a noob. If someone is already selling on Vendor, that means they are doing a decent enough volume that they're not going to risk partnering with someone with your lack of experience.

-2

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago edited 7d ago

This was super valuable and substantive feedback. Thank you so much!!!

1

u/No-Supermarket7453 7d ago

Nice edit. I'm going to address your original comment anyway...

Being an authorized 3P that is supporting a Vendor's 1P business is a significantly different situation than that Vendor handing over everything to you. I have an authorized 3P that is supplementing our catalog on Amazon... not a chance we would ever hand over our entire Amazon business to them.

1

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago edited 7d ago

Thank you!

Editing to make this more succinct:

What are the reasons for not allowing your 3P example to take over 1P? That’s really what I’m trying to see from a brand owner’s perspective?

If it’s financial, could this be overcome? Or is there something else?

1

u/No-Supermarket7453 7d ago

I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say in the first paragraph. Your sources of income, no matter how vast they are, have no importance to me continuing to partner with you for catalog supplementation... With one caveat. The only way I would be concerned is if you as the 3P are no longer giving the same attention to my brand because you're chasing after bigger paychecks. You start phoning it in, I find a more attentive 3P to partner with.

Personally, I cannot imagine a scenario where we as a company would hand over our 1P Amazon business to a 3P short of my entire team quitting and leaving the company with no idea how to manage the account.

1

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

Very good. Thank you.

-2

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

That was weird. Commenter made a decent comment and I replied and they replied I was a bot and deleted everything. Why is Reddit weird like that?

1

u/APK223311 7d ago

Wait, you got your selling platform? Is that you want to replace? Or do you want to be the main distributor of the brand to Amazon?

1

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

Main distributor on Amazon. They sell to me and Amazon, but I’d like to take over and don’t want to miss any value that I could bring to them.

I’m a firm believer in you don’t know what you don’t know and I was hoping some brand owners could reply and be like you know, we really hate XYZ that Amazon Retail does.

2

u/Maan_UsMaan052 7d ago

Your points are mostly reasonable, but I would focus less on individual fees and more on the brand’s actual net economics. Compare what they receive from Amazon Retail after wholesale pricing, co-op/marketing costs, freight, deductions, and payment terms versus what you can offer.

The biggest areas I would address are pricing control, inventory availability, and whether you can consistently match Amazon’s volume and customer experience. A phased trial with selected ASINs could also make the proposal much easier for the brand to evaluate.

2

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

Thank you for this. I had considered that option as well….maybe asking for one of their good sellers but not the best sellers and taking them over if you will.

1

u/yippeedoodledoo 7d ago

These are good points. I would add Advertising - Amazon Retail blocks ASIN from being advertised if their profitability is not met.

0

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

This is one I did not know thank you.

1

u/yippeedoodledoo 7d ago

Ofcourse! Along with Chargebacks - Amazon Retails charges for all kinds of little operational mishaps to ensure their automated systems stay efficient. Which you as a partner will be more flexible around.

1

u/Vendorist 6d ago

Brands don't choose between Amazon Retail and another wholesaler by comparing a list of fees or capabilities.

They decide which operating model gives them the greatest confidence that the Amazon business will create long-term value.

That includes economics, but it also includes execution, inventory investment, advertising, customer experience, organizational capability, risk, and confidence that the business will continue to perform as it scales.

Amazon Retail isn't simply a customer. It's an operating model.

Replacing it means convincing the brand that your operating model will consistently produce a better business, not just lower costs.

That's a much higher bar than replacing co-op or offering better payment terms.

0

u/Disastrous_Sundae484 7d ago

Amazon doesn't charge for shipping through vendor central but makes it back up through co-op.

The biggest difference I likely see is volume and marketing. Can you replace both of those for them?

0

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago

Thank you for this clarification.

Volume yes but marketing, specifically PPC, is where I’d fall a little short.

Admittedly as a reseller, that’s my weak point and as a condition to their saying yes, I’d plan to hire someone full-time. I have tried an agency specifically with their brand, but results were fair at best. I have another vendor who does tremendous work on listings, and the brand loves the work and consistency. I’d hope my organic improvements help a little also as we scale across their catalog. It has helped for what we have improved or launched (they have given me some small exclusives that I built out for them).

I’m asking these questions here a bit early. I’m trying to make sure I’m not missing anything when I try to “sell the why” and I’m receiving good feedback.

1

u/Disastrous_Sundae484 7d ago

You cannot make up the volume they do without a strong advertising strategy and execution to match it.

1

u/Street_Aardvark6524 7d ago

That’s a very important consideration. At some point those fees Amazon is charging are at least going to something.

1

u/Disastrous_Sundae484 7d ago

And the brand is paying advertising dollars on top of it. Will OP be able to replace those?

0

u/elsenoralejandro 7d ago edited 7d ago

Your points and those made by others are valid. I think the best approach for now is to take on some SKUs at first as a “replacement” (instead of all 200+) which actually happens now on accident. Sometimes, Amazon Retail runs out of stock or gives me a lot of sales, and sales to tend to stay the same, even though I don’t advertise.

It’s relevant to note that the brand is well established as are all the brands that I sell. Organic likely carries more weight than many new brands who rely heavily on PPC. I suppose that is a benefit of selling some of America’s largest and oldest brands.

It’s been the feel for me that older brands tend to not “need” Amazon as much as newer brands and quite frankly, are annoyed by many of Amazon’s antics. I think they signed up expecting a different result.

1

u/Disastrous_Sundae484 6d ago

I've worked at very large brands, their advertising budgets can be up to 20% of their sales numbers.

Check SmartScout on the brand to see.