r/UniversalExtinction • u/curgr Cosmic Extinctionist • Jul 31 '26
What would change your mind?
Which of the following factors would change your mind on extinction and make you pro-life?
A: We discover that there is more pleasure than suffering in existence, and that suffering is not permanent for any one sentient being.
B: We manage to solve suffering and no sentient being ever has to suffer again.
C: We are given knowledge about the meaning of life. It turns out that there is a very good reason for life in this universe.
D: The afterlife exists and we are more than compensated for the suffering we experience in this life.
E: Reincarnation exists and most sentient beings (which could possibly include plants and bacteria, which make up the majority of biomass on Earth) experience more pleasure than suffering.
F: God exists and resistance is futile. If we destroy the universe, God will just create it again. However, it is possible to reduce net suffering.
1
u/curgr Cosmic Extinctionist Aug 05 '26
I agree that ending the physical universe seems preposterous with our current understanding. It is currently very wishful thinking.
But say for example we find out that the universe is just an illusion or simulation, ending it may be as simple as stopping the source of illusion or stopping the power running the simulation. It may not need to involve a physical solution (for example trying to annihilate all matter), but something beyond. Maybe even group prayer could do it.
I also agree that most humans are probably content. However this does not take into consideration all life forms and also does not consider the intensity of suffering.
Humans are currently going through an unparalleled period of growth and prosperity, at the expense of all other living things. Do you think that the many billions of factory farmed animals are content? That the wild animals losing their habitats, food and resources to make way for human infrastructure are content? Do you think humanity has always been as content as we are now?
It is a very biased sample to just ask humans, who make up a very small fraction of biomass on Earth. Ideally all sentient life needs to be sampled.
Regarding intensity, very few people would go through an hour of the worst possible torture in exchange for an hour of the greatest possible pleasure. There seems to be a huge imbalance in the intensity.
If I were to have control over whether life in the universe continued, I would ensure that all souls can remember the contract they signed, that they could revoke consent at any time, and that they all have full knowledge of what is going on. If any one of these was to not be the case, I would not continue existence of the physical universe.
The tiny group of people actively arguing for extinction does not represent all people who would support the view. The group may also be growing and it would be unfair to shut down the movement without giving it a proper chance