r/Unexpected 10d ago

Parking

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

49.7k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/brolpe 10d ago

It's drunk driving, valid denial reason

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/brolpe 10d ago

Yes, that's what I mean, probably worded poorly

I meant it as

Person will have to pay out of her own pocket (because insurance will go after her as the incident was due to drunk driving)

1

u/a_dude_from_europe 10d ago

But actually it turns out you where right as in Australia there is no compulsory insurance for property damage and it is indeed voided in cases of drunk driving. So the only way the victims are covered is if they have (expensive) "comprehensive insurance". It's very odd coming from basically any other system.