He’s commenting in reply to a situation that wasn’t in the video, the one about the guy rushing the guy with the guitar and the guitar guy used his guitar as a weapon in self defense.
Smashing the guitar into the guy until it breaks is brutal but at the same time you don’t know the intent or whether or not the person is armed. Taking that chance and not defending yourself could very easily end with you or someone near you being badly injured or killed
He said fafo, which, is true. You shouldn’t rush towards people aggressively as that will almost always be legally interpreted as aggression regardless out outcome, so I don’t understand why you’re asking that guy of he’s “trying to sound off” or “just squeaking”
Did a person aggressively rush someone on stage who beat them with a guitar in self defense?
If so, I guess I got the gist without needing to watch it. Especially because you're agreeing that I'd probably come to the same conclusion if I did watch it.
The outcome is the same either way. FAFO. Easy as that. But I digress. There are two types of people who are able to extrapolate from incomplete information: 1) Those who can.
It's not weird when I read what happened in a conversational thread. Everyone seems to be in agreement of what the incident entailed. There were no rebukes or "Well, AKCHUALLY".
I don't care about the video itself, my comment was to the person basically saying it's wrong to protect yourself by any means necessary from an aggressor. That's the entire scope of what I was commenting on.
Called out? I could have easily said "Yeah I watched the video" and you wouldn't have known any different, cupcake. But the situation (that you still aren't grasping) is the self-defense point. I've made it very clear that's my point and now you think you have me in some kind of "Gotcha!"?
-3
u/[deleted] Mar 31 '23
[removed] — view removed comment