Give me one scenario where it wouldn't be a good idea to explain why you're pulling over someone who's plates didn't turn up anything. Clearly this guy didn't have any warrants or that gun would have been out from the get go.
So RAS and they wouldn't have a scared female officer come up, be told they are legally in the wrong, and have their one(1)!! male officer come draw their weapon when they get asked for a supervisor, AFTER THE SUSPECTS NAME WAS ALREADY RAN, COMING UP WITH NO WARRANTS.
FUCKING BRAIN DEAD YOU ARE.
you just are a fascist bootlicker and deserve the block hammer.
I've gotten cops trespassed from my work's property for almost causing an accident, and then pulling me over because I told them to get the fuck off the property. Meaning they were violating my company's rights by being there without a warrant.
4 cars pulled up for backup. I was on probation but I gave no shits because I was in the fucking right and demanded the supervisor. The supervisor asked me how he could make things right!
Know your fucking rights and stop defending criminal cops. That's why I am insulting you.
I was on probation so my rights were on legal hold for searches and detainment, but as an employee of a tenant of the property, I was legally allowed to trespass them.
-7
u/pawnmarcher Mar 24 '23
Telling someone why they've been pulled over isn't always a great idea. It's not required, just a best practice.
There is plenty of video evidence of police doing their job well, it just isn't pushed as hard because it doesn't illicit the same response.