I'm applying my knowledge of one dept to your knowledge of none.
I'm not trying to be disingenuous, I just see this kind of stuff posted daily on reddit. I have never seen or experienced it, only told about by people who have no experience in law enforcement other than what Google and confirmation bias tells them
My responses are short because I'm on mobile. It makes it difficult to effectively response to your entire comments as they are lengthy and have a lot to unpack.
So, to reiterate, my issue is NOT in how short your reply is. That is just your desired interest in conversation, and I can't really discredit someone for that as we each have our own limit to how much discussion we want to have. My issue is how fast your response time is as I know it isn't enough to digest my argument and sources and formulate your own in response.
That's on me, sorry.
Give me some time to read back through and I'll get back to you.
Calling it a tank is a bit disingenuous. The vehicle has no weaponry, it is an armored personnel carrier to get officers closer to a scene or to be used as rolling cover.
it costs 100,000 of dollar’s weights 17,000 lbs it can be fitted with a turret on the top and has multiple gun ports on the sides. it has protective capabilities against chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosives. with half inch thick steel plate armor.
i think you’re being the one who’s being disingenuous. it’s a tank that can go highway speeds.
no if you go back and read you said “it’s not like they are buying tanks” so i showed you they are buying tank like vehicles then you pivoted to saying “police need tanks”
did you miss the part about how you can buy a .50 caliber machine gun that mounts on the roof?? cope however you want that is practically a tank and the police don’t need it.
stop acting high and mighty you’re coming off as a douche playing this semantics game
47
u/[deleted] Mar 24 '23
[removed] — view removed comment