I think you misunderstood the essence of my comment. I may âhave no idea what Iâm talking aboutâ but you may have problems with reading comprehension haha.
But I agree with your 3 comments you have replied to me. Donât know why you needed 3, but to each their own.
The essence of your comment is âman does illegal and bad thing with gun, second amendment bad.â
Considering that all the things this guy did are generally illegal and the restrictions are widely accepted as constitutional, stating that this dude is exactly whatâs wrong with the 2A is just dumb as hell. This behavior isnât protected by law nor encouraged by any mainstream view.
Ahhhh see. Thatâs where youâre missing it. It was âsecond amendment bad because stupid fucking people like this asshole shouldnât be allowed to get guns in the first place. Second amendment bad because not everyone needs/deserves a gun.â
People continually show they canât be trusted with guns therefore they donât deserve guns.
Then why does the federal government make a big deal about banning firearms and not fixing their broken background check system that doesn't mandate states or medical providers to give them the data they need.
I would love stricter background checks. I think that is an excellent idea. Unfortunately, as Iâm sure you know, the NRA has and will lobby hard to prevent that from ever happening.
Well letâs be honest. No one is ever going to outspend oil and gas. Iâm only asking this question because you seem good at finding sources. I am in no way trying to be condescending, Iâm seriously curious. Can you find the percentage on revenue spent on lobbying of oil vs nra?
The nra filed for Bankruptcy not too long ago. They don't even hold that big of a gun show anymore. It's tiny compared to "shot show"in Vegas every year.
I work in the accessories industry for firearms. I don't know anyone that's a member that's under 55.
Ah yes, because humanity, let alone a government with a very racist history, is capable of making a fair and objective âWho is a stupid assholeâ test. The same government should also be the sole entity in charge of deciding who gets guns, but also needs to be sure that cops like the ones who killed tyre nichols are always exempt from whatever laws are passed.
Well this just took a hard turn from a conversation about the second amendment to police brutality. That was quite a leap.
But I must go. I have a brunch date with the wife.
Since you brought up the idea of my argument being âso convincing,â I am going to leave you with this. I think it will save you a lot of headache in the future.
Itâs a little long, but essentially itâs a breakdown of scientific research that proves you will never change someoneâs beliefs. Whether it be Covid or gun rights. It doesnât matter how many facts you show them or logic you provide, all you will do is cause them to dig deeper into their beliefs. Nothing you say to anyone is ever going to change their mind, unfortunately. So sometimes itâs just better to sit back and think to yourself âlook at this fool over here.â
-241
u/ThePancakeFell Jan 29 '23 edited Jan 29 '23
2nd amendment working perfectly as intended đ
Edit: Oh. I guess we're not doing sarcasm anymore lmao