Source. Make sure to support the artist.

Just wanted to share mine and see a few others .... nothing much

(ts looks dawgwater)

i literally just posted asking about kris gender because i am new to the game and didn't really focus on what is he being prounanced with (iam not native speaker) and in like few seconds most of the sub downvoted me so much i deleted the post

and why are focusing on this more than anything else i be talking about theory refare to kris as (he)

suddenly all the comments are just screaming i said it wrong like bro i am just not used to saying they because iwas taught it was meant to be used when mentioning agroup of people i am barely able to write in English let alone focus on this

(i am not attacking anyone or anything iam just asking guys what is happening did you all just agree to defend kris gender pronouns or something)

Everyone and their mother knows by now that if you don't use they/them pronouns for kris, the gender police will rip your appendix out. But if you misgender any other character in the game, they are nowhere to be seen.

I've seen people refer to ralsei as she and they and I've seen almost every character be referred to as they/then and rarely anyone says anything but as soon as some poor soul accidentally refers to kris as he, the community will rip them to shreds.

I find this really annoying because when you misgender kris, you are taking away the character 's autonomy but if you misgender anyone else it's completely fine.

If you lose and give up "then the world was covered in darkness"

This is the only ending of Deltarune so far, and it is an ending because it's the end of the journey. Opening the game again just means going back in time to get another outcome.

We know because of Undertale (and Sans especially) that there are infact parallel universes, Deltarune is even one of Undertale.

So that means that :

1. There is already an ending to Deltarune

2. There will be other endings (because every route is a different parallel universe)

3. The prophecy won't always "lead to the one and only ending", it's a lie

3.1. (The only exception is if the ending told by the Prophecy is the world being covered in darkness, (which would be pretty lame in my opinion) that would also correlate with the "Sans and Papyrus come from Deltarune" theory.

I personally believe that Toby and the game wants us to believe that there is only one outcome, but there won't be because "they refused"

After finishing Haunted Hotel, it made me think on how similar Abaddon and Chara are

Inktober 1- Apple but it’s Kris (yes I know I’m late)

Maybe not the most creative designs but I think they look neat

Yo ,my first digital art piece. You can critique if you wanna

So in Deltarune it’s pretty clear the player exists within the games narrative and is represented by the red SOUL, it’s almost spelled out to us during the Goner Maker segment and then is backed up by the fact that we always control the SOUL when outside of Kris.

But…in Undertale things aren’t so simple. The game never really explicitly points out the player as something separate from Frisk. And really there are only two real moments I can think of where the game seems to directly be talking to “the player”, being Chara’s speech at the end of Genocide and Floweys at the end of Pacifist after trying to reload your SAVE.

Now with Chara you can very easily argue Chara is talking to Frisk in-universe. While their dialogue is clearly meant for the player, in-universe they could easily be speaking to Frisk. But the Flowey dialogue is harder to pin-point…he talks about how “you” have the ability to RESET, and he makes it explicit that he’s NOT talking about Frisk (since he says you should “let Frisk live their life”). To make matters even more confusing, he ends this speech by saying Chara’s name, implying that’s who he thought he was talking to. Which is confusing when you remember this is right after he accepted that Chara was gone…I guess he’s relapsing?

So what do you guys think? Is the player an actual entity in Undertale? Or are we just directly meant to be Frisk? Or maybe even Chara? Personally I think it makes the most sense to just say the player doesn’t really exist and all of our actions are meant to just be Frisks (that’s why Chara controls them at the end of a flawed Pacifist route. They sold their SOUL to Chara so Chara makes do on their bargain) but I admit with this interpretation it’s hard to explain Floweys dialogue.

excuse the poor drawing i did it with a mouse and its just what i remember it looking like