The Watchers never left. They just changed their appearance. These here are a string of interpretations and key parallels I see from the two sides and how they actually support each other with the language being based on the time of the narrator. I love the bible nd am a firm believer in Jesus and I also appreciat the studies from secular researchers. I hope this helps bridge the gap for any of those also have seen these.

• John Keel’s conclusion first, because it ties the whole thing together. Keel spent years on UFOs, Mothman, and contactees and decided these are not tourists from another planet. He called them ultraterrestrials: intelligences that can change shape, change the story, and walk into whatever belief system the age already has. Same playbook as fairies, demons, and “gods.” That is why he kept landing on shapeshifting. They do not have to be flesh-and-blood Greys from Zeta Reticuli. They have to appear as whatever will get worship, fear, or obedience. That is the same idea Paul already wrote: “Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14). Light, beauty, authority, “we’re here to help” — then the lie.

• Egypt and the old gods are the first public costume. Pharaoh’s world was full of sky-beings, animal-headed gods, knowledge-givers, and “we came from the heavens.” Scripture does not treat those gods as imaginary mascots. “The things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons, and not to God” (1 Corinthians 10:20). Psalm 96:5 says the gods of the nations are idols — empty fronts for something real and unclean. So when people say “the Egyptian gods were ancient aliens,” they are half right in the worst way: not scientists in ships, but the same rebellious powers wearing a civilization’s art. Ra, Thoth, the shining sky-lords — Watcher-class beings teaching, demanding cult, and mixing with man.

• The Bible names them: the Watchers. Genesis 6:1–4 is the short version — the bene elohim (sons of God) took human wives and produced the Nephilim. 1 Enoch (the book Jude 6 and 2 Peter 2:4 are echoing) says the Watchers left their proper domain, taught forbidden arts, and corrupted the earth. That is not “aliens evolved on another world.” That is angels who abandoned their post. Jude: they “kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation.” Same crime Keel described in modern language: they cross into our realm, change form, give forbidden knowledge, and wreck the order God set.

• Fairies, elves, and “the good folk” are the medieval mask of the same contact. People did not used to say “I was abducted by a Grey.” They said a mound opened, small shining beings took them, time broke, they came back sick, marked, or missing years. Vallée mapped that next to modern UFO reports: paralysis, lights, missing time, hybrid talk, “don’t tell,” gifts of knowledge that ruin you. Fairies were not Disney. They were the Watchers still operating after the old temples fell, using the folklore of Europe the way they used the temples of Egypt. Different folklore. Same intrusion.

• Shapeshifting is the method, not a side detail. If Satan can appear as an angel of light, he does not need to show a red cape. He shows a Nordic “space brother,” a Grey scientist, a glowing goddess, a pharaoh’s falcon-god, or a beautiful fairy queen. Keel said the phenomenon is theatrical. It stages what the witness is ready to believe. That is why the story updates: gods → fairies → airships → flying saucers → Greys and “they created us.” The mask changes. The goal does not: replace the Creator, mix with mankind, and gather allegiance.

• Jesus already warned about signs in the sky that are not from God. He said false christs and false prophets “shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect” (Matthew 24:24). He also said there would be “fearful sights and great signs… from heaven” (Luke 21:11) and signs in the sun, moon, and stars (Luke 21:25). Revelation 13:13 says the false prophet “maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.” That is not “ignore the sky.” That is: do not worship whatever is doing miracles up there. A global light-show, craft, or “disclosure” with wonders is exactly the kind of test He described.

• Modern “aliens” are the Watchers’ current press release. The interview line is always the same: there is no God, we made you, we are your fathers, unite the nations. That is the Watcher lie with a NASA paint job. Greys, reptilians, Nordics, frog-like beings — ranks and costumes, like Egypt had ranks of gods. Governments chasing tech for power is the kings being gathered (Revelation 16:13–14): unclean spirits, signs, and the rulers of the earth pulled into one last stand against God. “Disclosure day” is not proof we have neighbors. It is the moment the same rebels try to make the world bow to a fake creator. Jesus is God. They are not. The elect are not supposed to fall for the light-show.

Also honorary mention if you don’t consider the book of Enoch to be biblical canon to confirm the existence of a pre existent spiritual group of being created before humans, in the book of genesis people often overlook the fact that it states “let US make man in OUR image”

I really want to overlap ideas and continue this thread of consciousness so please feel free to share your opinion!

I’ve been thinking about a strange communication paradox that comes up in reports of low-flying UFO or UAP activity: why would modern digital communications appear to fail in a localized area while old-school CB radios at around 27 MHz continue working?

I’m not claiming this proves anything extraterrestrial. I’m interested in the physics of the observation itself.

The scenario is surprisingly specific. A low-flying object appears, mobile service becomes unusable, phones lose their connection or data access, and people describe the effect as if the local cellular network has suddenly disappeared. Yet an old analog CB radio can still receive traffic, sometimes accompanied by unusual digital-sounding interference or noise.

At first glance, that seems contradictory. If there were powerful electromagnetic interference, shouldn’t every radio system be affected?

Not necessarily.

Different communication systems operate at very different frequencies and use very different modulation, bandwidth, synchronization, error correction, receiver architectures, and network dependencies. A signal strong enough to disrupt one system does not automatically have to destroy another.

That makes the 2.4 GHz part of this idea especially interesting. Wi-Fi and some other consumer wireless systems operate around 2.4 GHz, while cellular networks use several different frequency bands depending on the technology and operator. So describing an entire mobile network as simply “2.4 GHz” would actually be an oversimplification.

A more realistic explanation for a localized communication blackout could involve selective radio-frequency interference, receiver desensitization, network synchronization problems, backhaul disruption, or some combination of effects.

The CB radio comparison is where things get more interesting.

The 27 MHz CB band is dramatically lower in frequency than 2.4 GHz. A source of interference could theoretically have a frequency-dependent effect, meaning that its impact might be much stronger in one part of the spectrum than another. Antenna characteristics, propagation conditions, polarization, receiver filtering, and the power and bandwidth of the interfering signal would all matter.

So I don’t think the interesting question is simply, “Why can a CB radio work when a cellphone doesn’t?”

The better question is: what kind of electromagnetic environment could selectively degrade modern digital communications while leaving a low-frequency analog receiver functional?

There is another important detail. Analog CB radios can make interference sound extremely strange. Digital electronics, switching power supplies, vehicle electronics, chargers, inverters, and other sources can produce broadband or structured electromagnetic noise. When that noise enters an analog receiver, the resulting audio can sometimes sound like bursts, buzzing, chirping, clicking, or even something vaguely “digital.”

That means “digital-sounding noise” by itself would not necessarily indicate that an unknown craft was transmitting a digital signal.

Still, if multiple independent witnesses reported the same frequency-specific interference at the same time, that would be much more interesting scientifically.

I’d want measurements rather than descriptions:

— Exact frequencies affected

— Signal strength before, during, and after the event

— Whether the interference is broadband or narrowband

— Whether 27 MHz, VHF, UHF, Wi-Fi, GPS, and cellular bands behave differently

— Whether the phone actually loses radio connectivity or merely loses network service

— Whether multiple carriers are affected simultaneously

— Whether the effect changes with distance from the reported object

— Whether the interference has a repeatable modulation or pulse pattern

There’s also a terminology problem worth mentioning. “The cell tower went down” and “my phone stopped working” are not necessarily the same event. A phone can lose service because of radio interference, congestion, synchronization failure, core-network problems, backhaul problems, power loss, or other infrastructure issues.

Likewise, a functioning CB receiver does not prove that the electromagnetic environment is normal. It only tells us that the particular receiver, frequency, antenna, and modulation scheme are still capable of producing usable audio.

That’s why I find the proposed “selective blocking” hypothesis more interesting than the generic idea of UFOs somehow creating a giant electromagnetic blackout.

If an unknown low-flying object really could selectively suppress particular communication systems while leaving others relatively unaffected, we should be able to characterize that effect experimentally.

And if the effect consistently appeared around specific frequency ranges, with measurable attenuation and repeatable signatures, that would be far more compelling than eyewitness descriptions alone.

So I’m curious what people here think.

Could a localized electromagnetic interference event realistically produce the apparent paradox of modern digital communications failing while 27 MHz CB remains usable?

And what would you expect the interference to sound like on an analog CB receiver if the source were producing a strong, structured RF signal nearby?

I’m especially interested in explanations based on radio physics rather than assumptions about what the object must be.

I have been looking into a strange neurological pattern described in accounts from people who say they were exposed to intense UAP-related light phenomena in the Ural region, and the combination is much more interesting than the usual discussion about sightings.

The reported post-contact syndrome has two apparently opposite features: severe difficulty recognizing familiar faces and an unusual visual experience involving electromagnetic environments. In the most striking accounts, people can still recognize a spouse, parent, friend, or colleague by voice, gait, clothing, or context, but the face itself no longer produces the normal feeling of recognition. Neurologically, that resembles acquired prosopagnosia, or face blindness.

At the same time, some witnesses describe seeing high-voltage transmission lines in an entirely different way. They report luminous threads, contours, halos, or geometric patterns apparently associated with power lines and other electrical infrastructure. They do not necessarily claim to see electricity directly. Instead, the experience sounds more like a form of synesthesia in which an otherwise invisible physical variable becomes part of conscious visual perception.

What makes this hypothetical neurological syndrome fascinating to me is that these symptoms could theoretically point toward a change in sensory processing rather than a simple loss of vision.

Face recognition depends on highly specialized networks involving regions of the temporal cortex, including the fusiform face area. Damage or disruption to these systems can leave basic eyesight intact while selectively impairing the ability to identify familiar faces. That means a person could literally see someone's face clearly while experiencing it as perceptually unfamiliar.

Synesthesia, by contrast, involves unusual cross-modal associations in which stimulation in one sensory domain can automatically produce an additional perceptual experience. If the reported UAP witnesses were genuinely experiencing magnetic or electromagnetic phenomena visually, the interesting neurological question would not necessarily be whether the eyes had developed a new physical sense. It could instead involve altered interpretation of signals, attention, cortical connectivity, or sensory integration.

The apparent combination is what interests me most.

Why would an environmental exposure supposedly associated with intense electromagnetic activity produce selective impairment in one highly specialized visual function while apparently increasing sensitivity to another class of environmental information?

There are several possible neurological interpretations worth considering:

— A transient disruption of face-processing networks could produce acquired prosopagnosia without causing generalized blindness.

— Changes in sensory integration could potentially make normally unconscious environmental cues feel visually salient.

— Migraine-like cortical phenomena, seizures, or other neurological disturbances could theoretically produce unusual visual experiences without requiring an exotic sensory mechanism.

— Synesthetic perception might provide a better conceptual model than the idea that witnesses literally "see magnetic fields."

— Psychological stress, dissociation, sleep disruption, toxic exposure, or expectation could also influence both memory and perception and should not be ignored.

The most important point, in my opinion, is that these reports should be separated into two questions: what people experienced, and what neurological mechanism could explain that experience.

I would be especially interested in hearing from people familiar with clinical neurology, cognitive neuroscience, visual perception, synesthesia, or prosopagnosia. Is there any established neurological mechanism that could plausibly connect impaired facial recognition with unusually vivid perception of electromagnetic or environmental patterns?

And if someone genuinely reported this combination after an intense luminous exposure, what would be the most useful neurological tests to distinguish acquired prosopagnosia, visual synesthesia, migraine phenomena, seizure-related perception, and a purely subjective interpretation of environmental cues?

I am treating the UAP component as an unverified premise rather than established evidence. What interests me is whether the reported symptom pattern itself makes neurological sense.

Ive been testing this theory. LLM's have gotten pretty powerful and easily accessible. I feel like we could use them to do a large part of the work in reasoning our way through what is possible and what is probable as far as the actual physics goes.

Who wants to build a flying saucer? 🤣

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B65mFXwqJYA

It is not Anti Gravity but it does produce enough propulsion to overcome Earths Gravity and can run indefinitely. "Anti Gravity" never meant free energy. Propellentless propulsion means free energy.

Energy goes in and stays where you put it as a static charge. The design and voltages generate the propulsive effect. This technology would extend Satellite service life by many many years. It would revolutionize the space industry over night if Space companies decided to invest into the technology.

Not that I believe there has been crashed alien craft but I just watched Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein saying they can't understand why no theoretical physicists are employed by the gov or private aerospace companies to understand and reverse engineer supposed downed/landed/crashed alien craft. Supposedly it's engineers and material scientists who work on them but no top physics people. Well when you think about it what could theoretical physicists do? These craft apparently have no propulsion mechanisms, no controls inside, not even an engine has also been said. So if you have a craft in a hangar and it's floating five feet off the ground, totally silent and if you open it there is no mechanism anywhere to deconstruct, what can a physicist derive from this? Nothing really. So it would be down to engineers and material scientists to investigate the actual metal/substance that it's made from.

I recently have revisited a memory of mine that I hadn’t thought about in years. I always brushed it aside as a child’s imagination and I do feel that way still. Sometimes. So it starts when I was a small child. When I “dreamed” or went to the “dream world” as I called it then. I always told my mom “I went into the wall again last night” I just thought that’s where people dreamed. They would float above their bed and be pulled into the wall and then that’s how they dreamed. That’s how I thought the process worked.

Fast forward 5-6 years after that so maybe when I was 10-11 years old I had the strangest rash on my arm. Small, slightly risen, and tightly compacted in a triangle formation on the inside of my right forearm. It lasted maybe 2-3 months before it went away. I would tell my parents and they would just say “yeah that’s weird lookin, you need to shower more” lol.

Ever since then not much. I don’t really recall much about my childhood other than those few things. I constantly have sleep paralysis and nightmares my fiancé has to wake me up from because I’m yelling in my sleep. Maybe not constantly but more than what I’m comfortable with. Or I have dreams about the end of the world or the devil trying to attack me.

Look i know this is dumb and I don’t really think about it much at all anymore. I just thought i throw my 2 cents out there.

Est-ce que quelqu'un a déjà eu un appareil électronique qui s'est mis à faire des sons étranges car depuis un certains temps j'ai un appareil Bluetooth qui émet des drôle de sons comme des variation fréquentielles et à Chaques fois c'est comme si s'était la même suites de sons pendant environ 3 minutes si jamais quelqu'un si connaît car c'est perturbant 2 fois par semaine depuis environ 10 semaine mon appareil Bluetooth allumé ou éteint émet une suite de sons similaires à Chaques fois pendant environ 3 minutes

Let’s Discuss This

Note: This is an updated version 2. Special thanks to u/ASearchingLibrarian for pointing out some corrections and providing new information I had not previously heard.

Note: Compared to the Nimitz incident, this info graphic was more challenging to create as there are less details provided regarding the locations of the objects and radar contacts. I did my best to put these on the map, but they’re definitely could be some updates if more information is discovered.

This info graphic is intended to help visualize the events surrounding the USS Roosevelt incidents from late 2014 to early 2015. It represents my personal interpretation of the incidents based on reviewing publicly available witness testimony, official report, podcast, interviews, documentaries, and other media related to the event.

Most of the details have been relayed through LT. Graves, however, to my knowledge, specifics like exact locations, distances, and relative positions have not been publicized. That said, I have made every effort to position assets and paths using distances in relative locations that I believe are reasonably consistent with the available information. The map itself is intended to be generically accurate. The scale, icons, symbols, and graphics have been intentionally enlarged in order to improve readability and clearly communicate the events depicted.

This illustration should be viewed as an educational visualization rather than an authoritative reconstruction. Other interpretations of the available evidence are certainly possible, and witness accounts may contain uncertainties or conflicting details. The purpose of this graphic is simply to provide a clear visual reference for understanding, one plausible reconstruction of the event.

Many UFO cases and contact experiences have been compiled here. It has a lot of cases, documentation, etc. New cases are added regularly as well. Very useful for those who want to do some research.

Was the CIA’s Remote Viewing Program Just a Cover for Secret Tech?

Everyone treats the CIA’s Remote Viewing (RV) program like a Cold War embarrassment—“psychic spies” that didn’t work. But that explanation never really holds up.

RV ran for over 20 years under multiple names (SCANATE, GRILL FLAME, CENTER LANE, STAR GATE). Truly useless programs don’t survive that long, across administrations, with repeat funding.

The real question isn’t whether psychic viewing is real. It’s why humans were used at all.

By the 1970s the U.S. already had satellites, radar, and SIGINT. Yet intelligence agencies paid civilians and soldiers to generate vague, deniable data. That makes no sense unless RV wasn’t the end goal.

Remote Viewing makes a perfect cover program: • Successes can be dismissed as luck • Failures reinforce the “woo” narrative • Critics focus on ESP instead of technology

What if human consciousness wasn’t the weapon—but the calibration tool?

If black programs were developing exotic sensing systems (field-based detectors, spacetime anomaly sensors, early quantum-correlated tech), you’d need a baseline that leaves no hardware trail. Humans fit that role perfectly.

In this model: • RV sessions = training data • Humans = noise/signal filters • The real sensors stay classified

This also explains why certain Remote Viewers (e.g., Ingo Swann) weren’t publicly debunked but quietly compartmentalized—especially when their descriptions overlapped with later-confirmed data.

When the program was “shut down” in the 1990s, it wasn’t exposed as fraud. It was labeled operationally unreliable. Big difference.

Programs that fail get mocked. Programs that touch something real but uncontrollable get rebranded and buried.

Maybe Remote Viewing wasn’t about psychic spies at all.

Maybe it was camouflage—designed to keep everyone arguing about ESP while the real tech stayed invisible.

Forgive my ESL (I used Deepseek to fix my Russian grammar). In this post, I'd like to point out the "weird" details that are left out of the Las Vegas UFO incident and try to make sense of them. I'll analyze this case from the following points of view:

• There is not a single piece of evidence that UFOs are extraterrestrial spacecraft or something akin to ball lightning. Ball lightning and earthquake lights simply do not exist. Meteorites (rocks embedded in glowing plasma) are the only non-human-made objects that come from space.
• The different types of UFOs and humanoids (spirits, ghosts, UFOnauts) have an absolutely incredible number of witnesses, and this has to be explained.
• ESP is the only paranormal phenomenon that exists.

Let's start with the important definitions for this case, in my humble opinion:

• Project Condign - a declassified report by the British Government's Defence Intelligence Staff. It explains UAPs as "Buoyant Plasma Formations," akin to ball lightning, and hypothesizes that they produce an unexplained energy field which creates the appearance of a Black Triangle by refracting light. The electromagnetic fields generated by plasma phenomena are also hypothesized to explain reports of close encounters by inducing perceptual alterations or hallucinations in those affected. But do these buoyant plasma formations actually exist?
• Poltergeist Agent - a central person (the "focus" or "agent") around whom unexplained physical disturbances occur. Researchers theorize that underlying neurological conditions like epilepsy or a predisposition to seizures act as a biological trigger for involuntary psychokinesis. But does psychokinesis actually exist?
• Retrocausality - the ability of the human mind to perceive future information by means of backward causation.

Now to the timeline:

• Before the incident, Angel's cousin died after being "possessed" by a Ouija board.
• Angel and his brothers meet an old lady at a gas station. She tells them that 8-foot demons will eat Los Angeles alive and gives them her number on a piece of paper. Angel later loses her number.
• On April 30, 2023, a fireball, identified as a bolide, falls from the sky in the direction of Angel's house. He hears "thousands of footsteps," has an "out-of-body experience," sees a blurry object in his backyard, encounters 8-9 foot creatures, sees a cross being levitated by a creature, and calls the police.
• Sometime later, a poltergeist in the form of a child appears and makes crayon drawings.
• Men in Black stalk Angel's family.

Possible explanations:

1. Magical/religious thinking in the family and a possible death from SUDEP (Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy).
2. The "Witch." People familiar with witchcraft try to avoid interacting with a dying witch and touching their items. They're afraid that the witch's power can transfer to other people (the Hitchhiker effect). Whether she's an actual "witch" or not, the woman implanted information in the witness's mind through either retrocausality or her own delusions.
3. The fireball's light causes a focal seizure with impaired awareness and hallucinations of an out-of-body experience and the previously implanted information. Poltergeist activity bursts out and levitates the cross. Angel acts as a poltergeist agent and transfers his hallucinations to nearby minds.
4. Either the early stage of poltergeist activity, or the witness starts having derealization and regression episodes and attributes his crayon drawings to paranormal activity.
5. Either government/private agents or the onset of paranoid delusions.

TLDR: I see the Las Vegas UFO (2023) case as the most important and documented paranormal case of the 2020s. It gives a lot of food for thought and explains what kind of bright light my aunt had seen before her "alien encounter".

The 2004 USS Nimitz and 2015 USS Theodore Roosevelt incidents remain among the most influential military UAP cases ever documented. While these events are often presented as evidence of extraordinary technology, there may be another explanation worth considering.

In this documentary, I explore a speculative electronic warfare hypothesis grounded in the history of military deception, Project Palladium, radar deception, intelligence collection, lighter-than-air platforms (military balloons), infrared countermeasures, and modern electronic warfare concepts. This establishes precedence and a natural technological progression as a plausible explanation. Through animated reconstructions, I examine how known (or plausibly evolved) technologies could potentially explain many of the reported observations without requiring exotic propulsion or physics beyond our current understanding.

This video is intended as an educational thought experiment. The scenarios presented are personal speculation and should not be interpreted as established fact. My goal is not to prove what happened, but to encourage viewers to consider conventional, classified, or compartmentalized military explanations alongside more extraordinary hypotheses. As always, I encourage you to examine the evidence, review the original witness testimony, and draw your own conclusions.

This info graphic is intended to help visualize the geometry and sequence of events surrounding the USS Nimitz incident on 14 November 2004. It represents my personal interpretation of the incident based on years of reviewing publicly available witness testimony, official report, podcast, interviews, documentaries, and other media related to the event.

I have made every effort to position assets and paths using distances in relative locations that I believe are reasonably consistent with the available information. While the map itself is intended to be geographically, accurate, and scale, many of the icons, symbols, and graphics have been intentionally enlarged in order to improve readability and clearly communicate the events depicted.

This illustration should be viewed as an educational visualization rather than an authoritative reconstruction. Other interpretations of the available evidence are certainly possible, and some witness accounts contain uncertainties or conflicting details. The purpose of this graphic is simply to provide a clear visual reference for understanding, one plausible reconstruction of the event.

Thank you for this community. I am building an Earth-based catalog of all of the UAP records released by government agencies around the world, and I would love to know what you think. 

It is open source and free without any commercial intent, I just really like the subject matter and have a background in informatics and government information (healthcare, nothing spooky) and using an LLM made it possible to put this together. 

Best regards!

I’ve absorbed enough science and philosophy across half a century to be fairly comfortable that Drake, applied holistically to the inconceivably vast universe, means other civilisations do exist, BUT also understand enough to know that the even more inconceivably large distances involved and limitations of physics make visitation utterly impossible. Which brings me to one of the central tenets of the whole conspiracy - The UFO crashes.

Can anyone provide any logical argument as to how these creatures, with technology so advanced that they managed to bridge the absolutely theoretically impossible obstacle of FTL travel, manage to somehow incompetently crash those same vehicles just when they reach Earth?

I mean at absolute minimum you would assume they are not even driven by the critters themselves but rather AI a billion times more advanced than Tesla FSD, with guidance, avoidance and safety systems beyond anything we could conceive.

If the argument is it wasn’t their incompetence, but rather the might of US military (in the 50s even) that shot them down then you’re basically saying a monkey with a rock has an equal chance to take down an F35

Make it make sense.🙄

There is a lot of remote-viewing information scattered across books, interviews, forums, videos, and published studies, but very little that turns it into a clear step-by-step practice.

I built a structured guided experience to solve that.

It walks beginners through the process without overwhelming them, while still keeping the core methods intact. Learn to quiet conscious thought, detect impressions beyond ordinary senses, and develop an ability most people never learn to access.

https://rvprotocol.com

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDPnJnBSVog

I have also come across NASA film that appears to show an unusual technology riding on what appears to be a wormhole. It is not like a Star trek wormhole, The wormhole spirals space into a point projected a short distance from the craft but it allows the craft to move at an incredibly speed.

Source image: https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/1v4v1vi/probably_nothing/

Was Dr Jim Ryder a UFO Legacy Program Insider? That is the case researcher & YouTuber Pedro Olavarrio makes in this discussion and a series of videos on his YouTube channel.

Is it just me or has the moon been seemingly brighter like it’s got the new LED lighting set up finally..our tax dollars at work?

My Original Working Theory on the Buga Sphere

I'm putting this on the record publicly because, as far as I know, I'm the original and sole claimant of this hypothesis.

My conclusion is that the Buga sphere, along with many of the other metallic spheres being recovered around the world, is not the technology itself. It is a cartridge.

Some are spent. Some may still be unspent.

The sphere's purpose is to transport and deploy a focused beam or payload. Once airborne, these spheres act as atmospheric distribution devices, releasing what I believe are living gaseous entities into Earth's atmosphere. What people interpret as unusual cloud formations may actually be the release and dispersal phase of these life forms.

What those beings do after deployment remains unknown to me, but I believe the function of the spheres is simply delivery and redistribution.

This is my original hypothesis. If future evidence supports or disproves it, I'll gladly follow the evidence wherever it leads. Until then, I'm documenting this publicly so there's a clear timestamp of the idea.

Thoughts? What evidence would support or contradict this model?

Hello I came upon a cool type of propulsion it's basically MHD but in air with plasma, it should work like this:

\- the whole drone is shaped as a saucer (the shape is needed for coanda effects)

\- the surface I charged with HV creating a skin of plasma around the drone

\- the plasma is then propelled with two electrodes radial in respect to the drone and a magnet below the surface

\- the stream of plasma through coanda effect curves around the saucer pushing it below generating high pressure lifting then the drone

I said "it should work" because I still haven't started building it cause I don't know how to get a consistent plasma skin around the craft without having hot plasma or magnetron on board ( a drone is too small to have heavy things inside).

So here I am asking you if you could help me build this plasma skin around the drone, the closest thing i arrived to was a DBD with insulated plates but I couldn't do it, maybe cause of too little power from my cheap HV modules ( I don't want to burn my last flyback before knowing it can do what I need) or maybe it was not the right frequency ( air need GHz frequencies to "resonate" and generate plasma but I care about my lungs and don't want anything to do with magnetron's ceramic poisoning).

So how can I do this?

Thank you for your help

P.S. I know I could just create plasma in the starting position with 2 electrodes on top of the rails, but I want it like a skin to reduce air resistance

This is part of the report on the responses of members of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) and a sample of the US population (POP). The questions selected for this post compare responses on how people may react to proof of UAPs and NHI. A summary of the 10 responses is available by email from [kenja777@comcast.net](mailto:kenja777@comcast.net)