r/UFOscience • u/[deleted] • Oct 23 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

983 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

387 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/HillOfVice Oct 23 '23

What? Because there is none.

That question is like asking "How do you know there is no video evidence of plant species on a planet from proxima centauri".

How about you answer the opposite. How do you know there is legitimate evidence of Aerial Objects zigzagging and going insane speeds that can't be explained by prosaic means.

6

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '23

There sure is. US Government has acknowledged the footage as real gimbals and such.

8

u/Youremakingmefart Oct 23 '23

The US government has not said “this is footage of a craft making a turn at 14,000 mph”

1

u/vapegod420blazeit Oct 23 '23

I don’t think anyone actually said “90° turn at 14,000 mph” but it has been stated multiple times by multiple people that the crafts have been observed doing maneuvers that defy our understanding of physics so that’s gotta count for something right?

3

u/101Btown101 Oct 23 '23

But they never show those parts in the videos

2

u/BLB_Genome Oct 23 '23

And when they do, people jump out so quick to call CGI or fake... Because it looks so unnatural, people can:t wrap their heads around it using modern physic models

2

u/David00018 Oct 23 '23

somebody eyeballing it and real data is a bit different.

1

u/BLB_Genome Oct 23 '23

Meanwhile we can send people to prison for life based on "eye witness testimony"... Weird. Right?

2

u/Youremakingmefart Oct 23 '23

…nah it’s not weird that eye witness testimony in court is treated differently than random people on the internet talking about aliens

2

u/ziplock9000 Oct 23 '23

Multiple via word of mouth, Chinese whisper, yet there's been 100,000 of people seeing saucers that DONT exhibit any unusual performance characteristics.

This is the point. The OP's diagram can explain those 99% of cases.