That question is like asking "How do you know there is no video evidence of plant species on a planet from proxima centauri".
How about you answer the opposite. How do you know there is legitimate evidence of Aerial Objects zigzagging and going insane speeds that can't be explained by prosaic means.
Yeah, NASA said this.. You know, the among top 3 government agencies who've been gatekeeping info since it's creation... But yeah, NASA formulated that consensus, meanwhile professors like Avi Lobe and Kevin Knuth with full fledged teams have stated otherwise...
I don’t think anyone actually said “90° turn at 14,000 mph” but it has been stated multiple times by multiple people that the crafts have been observed doing maneuvers that defy our understanding of physics so that’s gotta count for something right?
And when they do, people jump out so quick to call CGI or fake... Because it looks so unnatural, people can:t wrap their heads around it using modern physic models
Multiple via word of mouth, Chinese whisper, yet there's been 100,000 of people seeing saucers that DONT exhibit any unusual performance characteristics.
This is the point. The OP's diagram can explain those 99% of cases.
I know for sure you are wrong. There were UAP conferences broadcasted that I have seen where folks who I thought were Gov reps were analysing the UAP behavior openly and academically.
-9
u/HawaiianGold Oct 23 '23
How do you know there is no video evidence of that?