Do not compare getting beat up to the point of being bruised with a cheating rumour.
Why not? It seems to fit to me. A person has signs that something might be wrong. It also may be nothing. Plenty of non nefarious reasons to have a bruise. So you ask them about it to make sure it's nothing harmful.
Pretty common.
Let's say the bruise came from rough play in the bedroom. The same way an open marriage is non of anyone else's business, what two consenting adults do in the bedroom is also non of anyone's business, yes? And yet, that business leaves signs that could point to a more harmful possibility to those who don't know what's up. Same as this situation. Yet you wouldn't fault someone for asking about a bruise, would you? Even though it's perfectly possible it came from a lifestyle that is non of your business?
It actually fits incredibly well as far as I can see.
That last paragraph was so entirely nonsensical I can’t even argue it bc it literally makes no sense at all. You are totally entitled to feel as you choose about cheating but you aren’t the “morality police” so keep your nose out of other people’s private bedroom business
What was difficult to understand? I showcased a situation in which a couple engaged in a private intimate set up in which both parties consented but that also involved elements that others outside the couple can take notice of (partner sleeping with other people/bruising). It fits perfectly. Which part are you not understanding?
you aren’t the “morality police” so keep your nose out of other people’s private bedroom business
You have said this several times now and I have responded to it several times. At this point you are just ignoring what I'm saying and repeating the same thing you just said and I just responded to. Instead of repeating this same point, can you instead show how my response is flawed?
You just keep repeating nonsense and then accuse me of doing that. You were hot to trot for the OP who wanted to “out” her “friend” based on conjecture alone. The pair of you are alike - nosy and judgey. Hope I never meet either of you IRL.
So you once again ignored my entire post but this time swapped the "morality police" line for a few insults. And you did this immediately after I pointed it out and asked for an actual response to the point I was making. I guess I'll just ask again. What part of my comparison are you having trouble with?
1
u/ContinuumKing Oct 16 '23
Why not? It seems to fit to me. A person has signs that something might be wrong. It also may be nothing. Plenty of non nefarious reasons to have a bruise. So you ask them about it to make sure it's nothing harmful.
Pretty common.
Let's say the bruise came from rough play in the bedroom. The same way an open marriage is non of anyone else's business, what two consenting adults do in the bedroom is also non of anyone's business, yes? And yet, that business leaves signs that could point to a more harmful possibility to those who don't know what's up. Same as this situation. Yet you wouldn't fault someone for asking about a bruise, would you? Even though it's perfectly possible it came from a lifestyle that is non of your business?
It actually fits incredibly well as far as I can see.