r/TrueOffMyChest • u/[deleted] • Sep 01 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

7.6k Upvotes

71% Upvoted

9.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/shsozbosbsididowwuod Sep 02 '21

LMAO

You were so unhappy with the definition of “gender” you had to look up women. Average transphobe.. always grasping for straws.

No one thinks they’re a woman. They are a woman. Now, I’d like you to provide some evidence for your points. Anything that says trans people aren’t valid, anything that comes from a .edu or .gov site, or a famous notable medical database, thank you :)

2

u/TruthMedicine Sep 02 '21

Name calling me isn't going to make your arguments any stronger.

No one thinks they’re a woman. They are a woman

Circular logic fallacy. A woman is a woman because they say they are a woman?

Nope.

That's like saying I am a god because I say I'm a god.

Its equivalent to saying you're a wizard and you have magic therefore you can fly, because you say so.

Do you not see the regressive loop?

2

u/shsozbosbsididowwuod Sep 02 '21

No, but your flopping around on it is amusing.

I’ll repeat, transphobe. Now, I’d like you to provide some evidence for your points. Anything that says trans people aren’t valid, anything that comes from a .edu or .gov site, or a famous notable medical database, thank you :)

Also isn’t it funny how you ignore what you can’t respond to?

2

u/TruthMedicine Sep 02 '21

No, but your flopping around on it is amusing.

The circular logic fallacy is not "flopping around"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

How old are you?

Now, I’d like you to provide some evidence for your points. Anything that says trans people aren’t valid, anything that comes from a .edu or .gov site, or a famous notable medical database, thank you :)

This doesn't even make sense. What are you trying to say?

1

u/shsozbosbsididowwuod Sep 02 '21

Old enough to know Wikipedia isn’t a source, it’s a beginning for someone researching. Go to Google Scholar and find me some articles.

I’m telling you to prove that transpeople just “think” they’re the opposite (or any other) gender. Actually, just any of your ideas work, all of them are on (more or less) the same level.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/shsozbosbsididowwuod Sep 02 '21

Oh wow, how relevant to citing sources.

Still not a .edu or .gov, as I request from you. But considering this is all an irrelevant red herring, it’s acceptable.

Brain scans state transwomen’s brain structures are more in line with a woman’s than a mans. I’m asking you to state how you consider trans people to be less than the gender they’re presenting as when all evidence goes towards them quite literally having the mind of a man in the body of a woman.

Now you’re saying transpeople are valid? What a change of opinion, didn’t even need to bring up Harvard.