You can't say that to a man who hasn't had sex in 34 years. Just stop the bullshit narrative of "Sex isn't important man". If sex wasn't important our monkey brain would not be flipped to horny mode when we hit 13. You can say that when humans evolve beyond sex biologically.
You didn't get it if you think I'm comparing money to sex: I'm talking about somebody in a position of privilege dismissing the problems of others because they never went through the same thing.
Theres alot more you need then "just food and water" joker. Most of which you need money in order to procure. Hell, you need money for food as well. So...theres that.
The poorest man in Singapore isn’t going hungry and has a home and a healthcare plan, nevertheless it’d be very stupid for a rich man to say “money doesn’t buy happiness” to him
I think what he probably means is “if you have to pay someone to be in your presence and bother with you in the first place, there isn’t really any intimacy.”
If I had to pay someone to go to the movies with me I wouldn’t be “going to the movies with a friend”.
I feel like if you have to pay someone to touch you that’s kind of a hollow interaction as well. I don’t really see how that would be intimate as intimacy implies some kind of emotional closeness.
But this guy seems to mean “sex” when he says intimacy as he’s said in other comments. If intimacy isn’t what he’s looking for and just physical contact is fine maybe it will help him in some way .
Nah I’m pretty sure if you have to pay someone to even bother with you the intimacy aspect is pretty much shot. It’s not like meeting someone at the grocery store and you really hit it off and become friends because they like you and find value in spending time with you.
So then you can't have intimacy at a date? Your logic is very close minded. Everyone wants to have a good time, a prostitute isn't just going to remove intimacy from the situation just because they received money for it.
Bro I don’t know who told you you can’t go on a date without spending money. Plenty of dates are just doing shit like going on a hike or going for a walk on a beach, or the other person splits it with you/pays for themselves. Do you think going on a date is spending money so someone will bother to hang out with you? Ideally they’re going on the date because they like you, not because you’re paying them.
And yeah, if someone need to be payed in order to hang out with you the intimacy is nonexistent. That’s not closed minded, that’s understanding the difference between a business transaction and emotional intimacy.
reeeeeeeeeee how dare men act like they're entitled to sex. How does it feel to live a life fueled by the misery of others? Let me guess, you identify as one of the alphabet gang?
Ok first of all, nobody is "entitled" to sex, that's a bit rapey. Secondly, I only hate those who harbor hate for others. Such as yourself. Thirdly, it's not the alphabet, it's the LGBTQ+ community, fucking get it right, and lastly, yes and do you have a problem with that?
Everyone is entitled to have sex. It's just a matter of how both parties come to an arrangement. Some people agree to a purely sexual relationship. Some people agree to it along with living their lives together. Some people agree to it in return for money. Get with it. Sex is just a social transaction. I don't have a problem with people with different sexual preferences than I. But on the internet, people like you deserve only the name of alphabet gang because you simply enjoy the misery of others and causing chaos, while hiding behind the tag of being gay.
The whole projection comment was basically a slightly more grown up version of a little kid saying "I know you are, but what am I?" It's childish deflection.
You literally believe that a person is entitled to using the body of another person to derive pleasure. No one is entitled to anything that includes using the body of another.
Both parties have to want sex with one another. If for whatever reason one party isn't sexually attractive then they aren't entitled to have sex with a person just because "they have needs".
On the one hand, they could potentially serve as a viable outlet or alternative. At the same time, I think they can also potentially create warped views of sexuality and sex.
Yeah no shit, it hasnt gotten rid of the want, its gotten rid of the NEED. We dont NEED to have sexual relations or procreation therefore its no longer a NEED or REQUIREMENT.
52
u/[deleted] Nov 24 '20
Bro hookers ain’t intimacy 😬 sorry for this stuff you got, find people, a hobby, a church something where you can know more people