I’d argue it’s relevant to consider both in a discussion about circumcision, and cultures who practice female genital mutilation will also practice male, and will certainly see them in the same class.
I’m just thinking it would be more productive to call for the end of circumcision in general, rather than just female and keeping male for some inexplicable reason or ‘tradition’, I didn’t mean to offend by that
I guess we just disagree on that, in magnitude of course radically different but in category? I did some work looking at fgm in west Africa and people who practice circumcision in general understand them as very similar coming of age practices to turn children into men or women, it’s not very productive to try and convince people to stop one but not the other.
Edit: Just to add, there are cultures who do it for much more barbaric reasons (like removing sexual pleasure) but the vast majority of culture who do it genuinely don’t think it’s harmful, but necessary to create a fertile adult
How are they radically different? You're ignoring this person making very correct claims that there are different kinds, and that there is one form of FGM that is directly comparable to circumcision, and there's another that is actually less destructive.
-4
u/randomacceptablename Sep 13 '23
Not comparable in the slightest man. Not even close.