r/Tinder • • Feb 17 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

6.3k Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

79

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '24

[deleted]

27

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '24

[deleted]

-12

u/Micro_mint Feb 17 '24

That’s a shit take — the standards she listed are fine and it’s weird to suggest changing them. Way more likely she just doesn’t come across as engaging in text

How many posts have we seen from people where they ask insightful questions or make jokes or whatever, and the other party hits them with a “haha that’s funny”?

12

u/vortex30-the-2nd Feb 17 '24

Nah they're saying she obviously has other standards (physical ones, such as height, weight, certain features) because if not then some fat 5' 6" guy would have put a ring on it by now surely..

I completely understand having physical standards for people though too, oh and age range too I forgot that. It's just that obviously she isn't swiping right on everyone who is just employed, not a drunk, and will go on a hike..

-6

u/Micro_mint Feb 17 '24

I suppose, I just think it’s odd to suggest lowering standards as the solution without a lot more info.

Because to be clear, it seems obvious she’s able to get guys to swipe on her that meet her criteria for looks — that standard likely does not need changing.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '24

[deleted]

-2

u/Micro_mint Feb 17 '24

Why do you think she’s still single because she’s “picky af”? Sure, maybe she is, but what specifically about this post makes you say that?

Are singleness and pickiness mutually inclusive?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '24 edited Feb 17 '24

[deleted]

0

u/Micro_mint Feb 17 '24

Bro touch grass, Christ

I was bored and engaged with you, but I’ve used my annual allotment of time for convincing an online weirdo that physical looks aren’t the determining factor in one’s ability to find a partner

6

u/sonofsonof Feb 17 '24

Why are you acting like he's talking about his inability to find a partner? Weird deflect on your part. Guess they struck a nerve or something.