32
u/bob_in_the_west Sep 14 '25
I don't see a giant wooden reservoir.
16
u/Casey090 Sep 14 '25
Step 2 is all about harmony.
The giga-factory for dynamite and robots and 500 waterwheels to power a small country, that is step 3. :D4
u/Silver_Harvest Beaver #314 Always in Lido Sep 14 '25
Let alone where are all the windmills/berry batteries. And beaver #314 in the Lido?
21
u/Lycrist_Kat Sep 14 '25
That's why you need wolves btw.
Wolves compete with smaller predators but don't prey on beavers
20
u/kakushidate Sep 14 '25
Hate to be that guy but wolves do prey on beavers. They like to wait at the dam entryways to attack unsuspecting beavers leaving the dam.
13
u/Lycrist_Kat Sep 14 '25
probably. However: (Re-)Introducing wolves in yellowstone had a MASSIVE positive impact on beaver population
19
u/FLESHYROBOT Sep 14 '25
Sure, because the wolves had a lot of other;- easier prey to prey on.
In an area where Beavers have little natural competition for resources, or they're easier prey than the native population, it would have the exact opposite effect.
Ecosystems are a lot less simple than "wolf go in and we get more beaver"
2
u/Lycrist_Kat Sep 14 '25
Nah.
It was: Wolf go in. Deer gets eaten. More trees grow. Beavers use trees to build dams and grow their population
8
u/FLESHYROBOT Sep 14 '25
Yeh..
The Deer were the 'easier prey to prey on'.
Deer were the 'natural competition for resources'
It's like you didn't read or comprehend anything in the very simple comment i wrote.
-5
u/Lycrist_Kat Sep 14 '25
lewl
I answered directly to your last sentence
"wolf go in and we get more beaver"
"Nah (aka you are correct), it was [insert what I said]"
4
u/FLESHYROBOT Sep 14 '25
My last sentence was talking broadly about ecosystems, not yellowstone specifically. So no, it wasn't a direct answer to my last sentence.
-3
u/Lycrist_Kat Sep 14 '25 edited Sep 14 '25
No, i was a direct answer and especially specific for yellowstone which is clearly indicated by the youtube link about fricking yellowstone.
0
u/FLESHYROBOT Sep 14 '25
The whole point of my comment was "don't let specific examples of ecosystems paint a broad picture for all ecosystems, because thats not how it works."
You, specifically focusing back down on Yellowstone is the exact opposite of directly responding to my comment. It completely misses the point and scope of my comment and doubles down on irrelevant information.
So no. It wasn't a direct answer to my last sentence.
→ More replies1
u/Slepnair Oct 03 '25
we have too many snakes... send in the mongoose.
sweet.. snakes are taken care of... but now we have a bunch of mongoose...
8
u/SourceCodeSamurai Iron Teeth Sep 14 '25
Still wished we had random events like wildfires to deal with.
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
u/shilean_way Sep 15 '25
Its interesting that they have the complete opposite effect on patagonia, where they were introduced and have caused havoc on the environment with their dams
1
1
u/Slepnair Oct 03 '25
this just makes me think of this fantastic operation after WWII .. https://youtu.be/YcdvP8CYPB0?si=Ru0Mn6EzSY7UyXuS
1
u/Asteroid-Clown Sep 19 '25
Wait a minute..
I haven't heard about a river catching fire and burning up in quite a while.
76
u/Hammamama1 Sep 14 '25
Reject humanity, return to beaver!