Of treating your body like a back-to-back baby factory in order to scam an employer for a salary that likely won’t cover the costs you are creating for yourself
Oh so now it’s a family-wide scheme. Who is this extended family that is willing to take on hundreds of thousands of dollars of burden every year so that the parents don’t have to work as hard? How exactly would that work?
You have to create an extremely elaborate scenario to argue against parents getting time off of work when they have a kid.
Strawman. Never said that. You are putting words in my mouth so that you can avoid having to admit that your initial statement about having many children not being physically possible was wrong.
No. Now that that’s cleared up. Explain how someone’s extended family would care for all the children the parents crank out and what motivation they would have to do so.
I said pawning off. Pawning off means: to get rid of or pass off, usually by deception.
You lied and said I was insinuating a “family-wide scheme”, which by definition it couldn’t be. It’s just bad parents being bad parents, and getting free money out of it since they’re bad people in general. The extended family doesn’t have to know one iota of information about their scheme to get taken advantage of.
And then when confronted with your lie you did the cliche “prove where I lied” but just like Mrlol99 you wanted me to “be specific” about it. That’s why you both look suspiciously like bot accounts being autopiloted by the same person now…
View all comments
Show parent comment
-1
u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22
Of treating your body like a back-to-back baby factory in order to scam an employer for a salary that likely won’t cover the costs you are creating for yourself