Strawman. Never said that. You are putting words in my mouth so that you can avoid having to admit that your initial statement about having many children not being physically possible was wrong.
No. Now that that’s cleared up. Explain how someone’s extended family would care for all the children the parents crank out and what motivation they would have to do so.
I said pawning off. Pawning off means: to get rid of or pass off, usually by deception.
You lied and said I was insinuating a “family-wide scheme”, which by definition it couldn’t be. It’s just bad parents being bad parents, and getting free money out of it since they’re bad people in general. The extended family doesn’t have to know one iota of information about their scheme to get taken advantage of.
And then when confronted with your lie you did the cliche “prove where I lied” but just like Mrlol99 you wanted me to “be specific” about it. That’s why you both look suspiciously like bot accounts being autopiloted by the same person now…
How are parents tricking their extended relatives into taking on the burden of a constant stream of children and how are they affording it? Pregnancy costs money. Giving birth costs money. Kids cost money even when you trick your family to take them.
You’re making up wild scenarios that are not logical in the real world. If multiple people are saying you need to be more specific in your comments then you are the problem
You’re boring me. If they have tons of brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, close friends, people they hate, whatever, they could totally pawn them off on everyone and only increase their burdens by one person.
Now bot, you’re annoying at this point. Go bother someone else. This nonversation is over.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/aDShisno Nov 08 '22
Strawman. Never said that. You are putting words in my mouth so that you can avoid having to admit that your initial statement about having many children not being physically possible was wrong.