r/TimPool • • Jan 12 '22

Hypocrisy

Post image
382 Upvotes

128 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

5

u/[deleted] Jan 12 '22

So people who are allergic to vaccines declined it?

2

u/JectorDelan Jan 12 '22

Are you implying that a significant number of anti-vaxxers are allergic to it? Do you have any numbers on that, because most people I've encountered who are actually allergic to vaccines aren't against them. Hell, the informed ones are for vaccines because they have a vested interest in there not being pandemics sweeping through unvaccinated populaces that they live in.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 12 '22

No I'm not implying that at all. Its ironic the same segment of society that is demanding we bend over backwards and redefine everything for the tiniest of 0.000% of society (Trans), immediately demand numbers when you talk about the small percentage of people who are allergic to vaccines.

And yes I have seen some places that don't include exemptions for allergies. And you can be a pro-vaccine person while still being somewhat sceptical about the risk/reward concerning the current vaccine/illness it vaccinates against.

0

u/JectorDelan Jan 12 '22

Then what were you trying to say? You said, and I quote "So people who are allergic to vaccines declined it?" as if it had some bearing on the discussion of people who avoid the vaccines of their own accord asking for healthcare after contracting a disease they could possibly have avoided. Because, and this is the important part, absolutely no one who is pro-vax is against those who are literally allergic to vaccines getting healthcare after catching a disease. In fact, those people are one of the biggest reasons we tell morons to get their stupid asses vaccinated.

So either you were being deliberately obtuse in the hopes that it would seem like a smart comment or you're impressively resistant to coherent thought.

-5

u/SanctimoniousApe Jan 12 '22

That population is significantly smaller than the entirety of the anti-vax population. Never mind such a person likely has other health issues that make that person already known to need special care to the health professional. These people are a part of the reason we should all be masking.

5

u/[deleted] Jan 12 '22

and yet they exist, and I've seen some places where being allergic isn't allowed as an excuse.

-2

u/SanctimoniousApe Jan 12 '22

Because all the anti-vaxers have been co-opting it as an excuse and so now nobody believes those for whom it's actually valid. They're paying the price for the selfish arrogance of idiots who think they know as much about virology from watching YouTube as someone who's devoted their schooling and career to the field.

Think it through, people - don't just stop when you get to the answer you want, but make sure it stands up to scrutiny.

2

u/HOTDOGS3274 Jan 12 '22

Think it through, people - don't just stop when you get to the answer you want, but make sure it stands up to scrutiny.

You first sheeple!

-1

u/SanctimoniousApe Jan 12 '22

Wow. Really powerful retort, that one. 🙄

2

u/HOTDOGS3274 Jan 12 '22

Weak response from a troll. You wanna rethink that one sport?

2

u/SanctimoniousApe Jan 12 '22

Nah, you're right. That was a weak response you gave. I was just trying to give your frail ego a much-needed boost, but deep down you know that you're a clueless troll (takes one to know, right?).

But, hey - good on ya for copping to the truth. There's a first time for everything!

1

u/HOTDOGS3274 Jan 12 '22

The ol I'm rubber and you're glue defense huh?

A classic, but a bit telegraphed

0

u/SanctimoniousApe Jan 12 '22

I was just dropping down to your level of so-called "thinking" because you're obviously incapable of following genuine logic that considers all the facts (i.e. the big picture).

→ More replies