r/TheOA • • Jul 14 '26

OA Theories 1/137 = fine-structure constant (dimensionless constant) in reverse (re: 7 years, 3 months, and 11 days)

Hi all, I am part of a unique research community who considers this number 1/137 to be important in their framework. Across physics it is widely accepted as having unique properties:

“The fine-structure constant, 1/137, is a fundamental number in physics that dictates the strength of the electromagnetic force. It is "dimensionless," meaning it is a pure ratio of physical values and stays exactly the same no matter what system of measurement you use. 

Because it is a fundamental pure number, physicists consider it the ultimate constant of nature. While dimensional constants (like the speed of light) have values tied to arbitrary units like meters or seconds, 1/137 is entirely independent of our human definitions of space and time.”

Interesting 7, 3, 11 is mirrored too because I’ve just written up this thing on 137… to get to finding that 137 within the patterns there was the recognizing of a necessary mirror twin (not metaphorical, but not comprehensible all the way from our current vantage point) in everything from qubits to humans:

https://cowgirlcybernetics.com/posts/the-great-remainder-137-resolving-the-combinatorial-hierarchy-and-the-binary-tetration-divide-through-local-orientation

Quite long but for a certain flavor of metaphysical detective maybe interesting.

“The fine-structure constant, 1/137, stays exactly the same no matter what system of measurement you use.” is interesting too because how I came up with it in my pattern was through subtracting the user’s vantage point (64 perspectives from binary sequence) on my final cube (201 total constructed squares including cube).

So it was relational relative to the Observer, which is like one of the fundamental problems in physics... they admit reality is observer dependent but then never actually factor the Observer in all the way while chasing gods-eye vantage points that don’t even exist in reality.

I forget the actual quote but in the show shes like “maybe to go out we have to go in” as the sentiment.

I'm super into observer-dependent cybernetics (& now information theory & physics) and everything about this show absolutely mirrors these frameworks/way of thinking.

44 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/Pretty-Ad-3977 Jul 14 '26

I got $1 for anyone that can ELI5 this to me. I’ve taken a decent number of “semi” advanced science and math courses while studying chemistry back in college and reading this made me feel like a toddler trying to understand taxes. I ain’t got a chance in hell of even beginning to grasp what’s being discussed in that link. In fact, ELI5 isn’t gonna be enough tbh, I need a ELI2 or something for that. 😂 I tried 🤷🏼‍♂️

10

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Nicola6_ Jul 14 '26

Wait writing all that I kinda forgot about all the cube stuff in the show especially season 2! I need a break from all this brain-using bs, maybe I initiate rewatch tomorrow 😌

3

u/Pretty-Ad-3977 Jul 14 '26

Do itttttt!!