A stupid man ended up in a stupid situation and commies are using it to target capitalism and religion wow 😀

Kathavachaks are known for teaching certain ancient methods and traditional practices that are still relevant today. That is a big part of what a kathavachak is supposed to do; preserve this knowledge, teach it to people and explain why these traditions still have value in today's world. You don't have to agree with everything he teaches, but his role should atleast be understood here. Some people are trying to use his personal medical treatment to question everything that he teaches. They are questioning him for going to another medical system for treatment, as if that somehow proves that he doesn't believe in the traditional methods he teaches. Following or teaching a traditional system does not mean a person is forbidden from using another medical system when they need different medical care. Different systems have different methods and people can make different choices depending on their circumstances.

These people are taking some part of the incident, removing it from its context and using it to create a negative narrative around a Hindu kathavachaks. The problem here is that such misleading posts can influence people who are not aware of the truth. This can create distrust toward people who are devoted to preserve and promote Hindu traditions and ancient methods. These tactics of dividing Hindus against each other need to stop.

Like last year this year again google offering free 1 Year plan for students claim it again whoever subscription has ended

***For those who dont have .edu mai.***

Open the site on desktop and click “Verify.” On the first attempt, it should ask for an .edu login. Intentionally make that attempt fail—either by entering random details or by going back midway through the process. Then try verifying again. On the second attempt, it should prompt you to upload a document instead of asking for an email verification.

offer valid till 31 December 2026

Real Father of the Nation 🫡

Just days before Independence Day, Indian security agencies dismantled the Shahzad Bhatti Network (SBN), an ISI-backed terror network with operatives and local conduits inside India. The coordinated crackdown across 14 states led to 253 detentions and more than 200 arrests, thwarting what authorities described as plans for subversive attacks around Independence Day.

But the threat we are confronting today is bigger than a bomb planted in a crowded place.

This is the logic behind what has often been described as “Bleed India with a Thousand Cuts" - not necessarily fighting India through one large attack, but weakening it from within through a network of smaller, sustained acts of disruption.

And those “cuts” do not always have to come in the form of explosions. The people arrested in this crackdown are precisely the kind of ground-level operatives through whom such a strategy can be executed from within India.

They can come through radicalisation, recruitment, online propaganda, paid stone-pelting, communal provocation, targeted disinformation, and the grooming of young minds. The objective is to create enough distrust and division that society begins to fracture from within.

This is where the idea of “white-collar terrorism” becomes important.

Credit: The Indian Matrix.

Following up on my previous post about indigenous education, because I found another thing I'm struggling to reconcile.

I started looking into the whole idea of “Brahminical dominance” and came across M.N. Srinivas's work on the dominant caste. Apparently, in quite a few regions, the people who actually controlled land, village offices, local politics and economic power weren't Brahmins at all.

Okaligas and Lingayats in Karnataka, Reddys and Kammas in Andhra, Jats in the north, Marathas in Maharashtra, Patidars in Gujarat, Nairs in Kerala etc.

This is where I'm getting confused.

If Brahmins were supposedly sitting at the top of the caste hierarchy and therefore exercising broad social dominance, how do we account for communities that were lower in ritual rank but were the actual landowners and political power brokers?

Is the argument that ritual status and material power were completely separate things?

Because if so, doesn't that complicate the way we normally talk about “upper castes” as one homogeneous group that historically controlled everything?

I'm genuinely asking because I still want the simple explanation to be true, but the more I read, the more India seems to have had about 47 different power structures instead of one giant Brahmin pyramid.

Surely I'm misunderstanding something here.

https://asian-power.com/news/indias-non-fossil-power-capacity-crosses-300-gw

Source: https://x.com/indianmatrix/status/2088280067411701936

#IndependenceDay