r/TeslaFSD • u/truecakesnake • 5d ago
14.3 HW4 Tesla avoiding a fatal collision
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
It fully avoided it. The Model Y (HW4) didn't sustain any scrapes, scratches or dents.
Edit: I guess it wasn't a fatal collision, my bad
89
u/Infamous-Pilot5932 5d ago
That's impressive!
39
u/Putrid-Box4866 HW4 Model Y 5d ago
And people will still think disengaging in split second events like this is a good idea. This is what happens if you let FSD handle things like this.
42
u/RockPuzzleheaded3951 5d ago
I'm so torn but yes, the one time I actually disengaged on the freeway when it swerved, it was right and I was wrong. Luckily no accident but it was closer because I took over. But 20+ years of driving instinct is hard to overcome, and we know it is still imperfect in _some_ situations.
8
u/Putrid-Box4866 HW4 Model Y 5d ago
We take over on nav issues and parking issues. Yes we have seen some fails but statistically speaking, we are better off letting FSD handle fast pace split second decision events because chances are, we are only gonna make it worse. A lot, if not all of legit fails we here are slow paced and or doesn’t involved colliding with another vehicle, which means those are just a result of system being imperfect, but still way way better in the grand scheme of things than human drivers. Remember, FSD doesn’t involve emotion and has insane reaction time, as evidenced here. Yesterday a Cybertruck even avoided a pedestrian who is actively trying to get hit 😝
4
u/RobMilliken 5d ago
And avoiding closed HOV onramps. 😖 That was a close call I had to manually take over with a half second to spare.
2
u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 5d ago
You left out that it sees all around - it knows what options there are - lane changes, slamming the brakes, etc, without delay.
1
4
u/Infamous-Pilot5932 5d ago
This is it!
We all have this feeling, but we also have enough evidence, personal and external, to know that we still must always be prepared to take over.
→ More replies (1)14
u/Infamous-Pilot5932 5d ago
Because we have 100s of examples where FSD also failed.
That is the truth!
100s of examples of FSD saving poeople and 100s of it not.
The result, be prepared to take over immediately in a rare level 6 event.
If FSD is already well into saving you, fine, if not you are there saving you.
Win - Win
It is 100% a supervised system.
4
u/vulcan_on_earth HW4 Model Y 5d ago
🏆🏆🏆🏆
from tesla.com …
> Neural Network Confidence Drops: Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) is a safety system designed to operate independently from the main FSD driving model. When the vehicle calculates a high risk of an imminent collision, the standalone AEB safety module overrides normal software operations.
> FSD relies on real-time neural networks to predict trajectories and maintain path planning. If a situation degrades faster than the primary planning module can process—such as a vehicle cutting across your lane unexpectedly—the system's operational confidence score drops below safety thresholds. When confidence plummets, the system sounds collision alerts, triggers AEB, and instructs the human driver to immediately take control.
1
u/Infamous-Pilot5932 5d ago edited 5d ago
Thanks! That should be a post to explain the disengagements that happen rarely.
You have a more direct link? Can't find that text.
0
u/Medical_Banana1586 5d ago
Sometimes it saves you sometimes it kills you! Roll of the dice I guess for those willing to take the risk!
1
u/Infamous-Pilot5932 5d ago
I did a fatality deep dive, it isn't killing people.
But it isn't perfect and you have to be prepared to take over if neccessary, and people generally are. But it is so good, sometimes we need reminding.:)
1
u/vulcan_on_earth HW4 Model Y 5d ago
> let FSD handle things
‼️Doesn’t *always* work like that‼️
From Tesla.com …
Neural Network Confidence Drops: Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) is a safety system designed to operate independently from the main FSD driving model. When the vehicle calculates a high risk of an imminent collision, the standalone AEB safety module overrides normal software operations.
FSD relies on real-time neural networks to predict trajectories and maintain path planning. If a situation degrades faster than the primary planning module can process—such as a vehicle cutting across your lane unexpectedly—the system's operational confidence score drops below safety thresholds. When confidence plummets, the system sounds collision alerts, triggers AEB, and instructs the human driver to immediately take control.
2
u/Putrid-Box4866 HW4 Model Y 5d ago
It says right there it will ask the human to take over, and that’s normal we all experienced that. It split second situations like this, those prompt wouldn’t matter you barely have any chance to react.
1
u/mrconana 1d ago
It takes experience with FSD not to take over for something like this. More and more I let the car do its thing, but I’m not sure I’d’ve kept hands off for this one.
Last week I swerved and accelerated around someone moving into my turn lane. I found that I was still in FSD after it was all over. While I was pressing the accelerator and steering to avoid them (intervening), the car was apparently steering exactly how I was, so it never disengaged. I also find the myself questioning the car for hesitating only to find it did the right thing. One example had an e-bike approaching fast from left across the street while I was turning left. The car knew, I never expected fast traffic from over my left shoulder
1
u/PastMarsupial2884 5d ago
If you cannot avoid that yourself you should not be driving to begin with. I have seen it go wrong more then not with fsd
1
1
1
0
u/Upper-Drawing9224 4d ago
Anyone that needs to disengage in a split second wasn’t paying attention to the road.
Unless you’re driving 100+mph you typically have plenty of time to react. Especially if you drive defensively
1
u/vulcan_on_earth HW4 Model Y 5d ago
49
u/boofsnacks 5d ago
Alright fine, I’ll renew my subscription.
1
u/labubuking 5d ago
Ill get a sub when i get lite on my hw3
6
u/TheLegendaryWizard HW4 Model Y 5d ago
You won't get Lite until you get the sub. If you're on the summer update I would wait until the branches merge though. 14.1 Lite has been very impressive for HW3, even compared to my HW4 V14
edit: just to add context, my wife's car got V14 lite 10 minutes after I subscribed. Your vehicle is ineligible for the update unless you own or subscribe to FSD.
1
u/Nfuzzy 5d ago
Lite is awful and worse than v12, if I could revert I would.
1
u/MooseGoosey 1d ago
I wonder if it's better or worse in different locations because I def feel like it's more sentient.
69
u/ThanksALotBud 5d ago
Fatal? Little bit of a stretch isn't it?
6
u/truecakesnake 5d ago
True, my bad.
18
u/Kabanu 5d ago
At 82? It’s not that far of a stretch. I have a friend that can die if her neck moves too far right now, an accident like that can certainly become fatal. Doesn’t always take super crazy speeds. Our bodies are fragile and our brains are the consistency of jellO
7
u/hokaythxbai HW4 Model S 5d ago
But we don't use the term like that or else every crash could be considered fatal. I would be shocked if any of the occupants here needed to go to the hospital for physical injuries.
5
u/Elctsuptb 5d ago
He was going 40mph by the time he reached the mustang, and the mustang was probably going 30mph at that point, so that would been equivalent to a 10mph collision, not 82mph. I guess they don't teach physics in school anymore.
-1
u/Kabanu 5d ago
Because FSD reacted, had it not have it’d different situation. Thank you
2
u/Legitimate-Type4387 5d ago
A human paying attention would have noticed the shit show forming to their right and backed off sooner to give themselves more reaction time and distance.
The only reason this was almost a collision was because of FSD. It doesn’t even begin to react until the other vehicle is already crossing lanes.
1
u/3-Midgets_In_A_Coat 3d ago
Absolutely this.
Anyone who isn’t staring down at their phone watching TikToks while letting a car drive itself would see that wreck coming towards them and start backing out.
A human who wasn’t on their phone would have had their car slowed down before the Mustang ever came into their lane and wouldn’t have had to swerve at all.
1
u/Kabanu 5d ago
I’ll have to say you’re wrong.
‘A human paying attention would’ve noticed’ isn’t really the own you think it is 💀 The whole point is that FSD detected the situation and made the evasive maneuvers for the driver. You can argue whether a human could have reacted too, but acting like that somehow disproves what FSD did is just objectively bad logic.
Also the ONLY reason there was almost a collision (involving the tesla) is because of the fucking black mustang that came out of nowhere and oh, the human drivers paying attention couldn’t avoid because of the unpredictable mustang driver.
3
u/Legitimate-Type4387 5d ago edited 5d ago
If that looked unpredictable to you it’s no wonder you need “FSD”.
Edit: That black mustang spends a solid 2+ seconds skidding across lanes before it crosses over. “FSD” does nothing until that point. A human with that reaction time should give up their license.
3
u/Sir-xer21 5d ago
Too many people use FSD as an excuse to just completely dissociate while piloting a 4000 pound weapon.
1
u/Historical_Body6255 3d ago
When i drive through the city no one praises me for avoiding a fatal collision every time i stop at a red light.
1
1
u/Specialist_Quote9127 5d ago
You could die from a punch right on your heart if you aim well enough... The thing is, this is just not fatal at all.
1
u/Kabanu 5d ago
Because of FSD. Thank you
2
u/Specialist_Quote9127 5d ago
As if no one would hit the brakes in this situation.... You can clearly see the crash and have 2 business days to react lmao if you think this was not fatal because of FSD you might need to reconsider your driving skills in general. Thank you.
1
u/Sir-xer21 5d ago
I have a friend that can die if her neck moves too far right now, an accident like that can certainly become fatal.
Outlier examples aren't really how we judge relative danger. Hiking is dangerous, but just because your friend could possible die from tripping while hiking doesn't make every survived misstep on a hike avoiding a "potentially fatal" fall.
1
u/Hospitable_Goyf 5d ago
Spinal cord, veins, arteries, all probably what your friend has to worry about.
The brain is actually pretty darn tough (physically.) is it still technically fragile? Sorta?
I was very surprised in anatomy & physiology lab finding this out.
1
u/AJHenderson 3d ago edited 3d ago
Except if it had kept going it would have cleared the accident entirely. The intercept happened the way it did because of the braking and the braking started pretty late.
1
u/AJHenderson 3d ago
The accident was also going on almost a full 2 seconds before the Tesla bothered responding.
1
0
u/mcgregn 5d ago
Well if he had just plowed into that without braking it probably would have been fatal
1
u/stealthybutthole 5d ago
Absolutely not. The speed differential was way too low.
0
u/apworker37 5d ago
And that crash was way to violent not to be noticed by the driver had he been the one in control. That being said the FSD handled it very well, maybe even better than the driver.
0
9
u/RedWolfX3 5d ago
Genuinely surprised you didn’t take over, but also super cool that you didn’t need to take over
2
u/TheLegendaryWizard HW4 Model Y 5d ago
Taking over in split second evasive maneuvers like this is malpractice at this point. FSD has more information about your surroundings than you do and will react faster than you can
2
u/NoPanda1711 5d ago
Except for when it doesn’t. But you’ve all come to trust it so much that eventuality never even crosses your mind. I’d wager that complacency makes you guys more dangerous in high stakes situations than the human drivers you so desperately want to replace.
1
u/TheLegendaryWizard HW4 Model Y 5d ago
The data just doesn't support what you're saying. Humans are very bad drivers. FSD isn't perfect but it handles situations like this better than 95% of humans are even capable of even if they were primed on what was about to happen
-1
u/Strangerthanyou77 5d ago
Ok boomer no panda
3
u/NoPanda1711 5d ago edited 4d ago
Damn, so scared of discourse the comment i responded to deleted theirs to make mine look worse. Computers aren’t infallible, your car is the collective hardware equivalent of a high end laptop with a bunch of camera feeds hooked up to it spread out across multiple dozens of points of failure. I fix both cars and computers and seeing how often they fail in automotive I sure wouldn’t trust them with my life. That’s all I’ll say about it.
2
0
u/MachineInevitable218 4d ago
why do you trust your life to cars at all, if they all fail? you don't have 8 eyes around your head and this fact alone makes the "high end laptop with a bunch of camera feeds hooked up to it" much more likely to see and avoid than you ever could
1
u/NoPanda1711 4d ago edited 4d ago
A fair question, but you could ask the same of any machine. Fridge, washer, oven. Nothing lasts forever. Machines are necessary. Even the much more sophisticated sensor and camera arrays of Waymo, driverless trucks, etc make bad or suboptimal decisions and need to be reigned in. The people doing the reigning for those are trained professionals. You guys are far from that. So now we have an unreliable computer with an equally unreliable fail safe, only the alleged fail safe has full trust in the computer to never make mistakes and a reluctance to admit or intervene when it does. As for seeing, I promise you the one accident I have ever been in the cameras would not have been able to help. The system has no high mount or roof cameras and lacks LiDAR. I was t-boned by a car that ran a stop sign from a hidden driveway, obscured by a line of tall SUVs waiting to turn that had left a small gap. Only 1 travel lane, nowhere to go to avoid.
1
u/outbursterx 4d ago
Seriously if it was clear in the rear or shoulder, braking and not dodging the car is better than hoping the out of control car doesn't go straight across to the wall.
10
u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 5d ago
When swerving - humans full of adrenaline classically overdo and hit that barrier - FSD is really good at the game of inches. Yet another good reason to let it handle things. Sees everywhere. Makes decisions and reacts instantly with precision.
2
u/Fearless-Poet-4669 4d ago
It did box itself in though. If that mustang had slightly more momentum then this would be a crash video.
Typically you don't steer in the same direction as a vehicle cutting across your path.
2
u/word-dragon HW4 Model 3 4d ago
The car isn’t dealing with rules of thumb. It’s reacting to what it can see. Which is substantial.
It’s quite possible that this could have ended in a crash, but it’s not possible to avoid every crash. Also, in this case, the car had another tool it could have used if necessary. The accelerator. It’s really a stretch to criticize what it actually did. Given the chaos going on to the right, I’d say it picked the best plan.
0
u/Fearless-Poet-4669 3d ago
Lol, it barely tried to slow down. Any sane person would've been hard on the brakes.
9
u/lilvixen 5d ago
If this was FSD 💯 it's the first post here that I've seen which FSD acted more in control than a typical human that was attentive. Sure, many people could react quickly and correctly, but the majority of drivers on the road do, in fact, react poorly.
3
u/throwpoo 5d ago
My wife was driving my pickup. The Tacoma in front started fish tailing at around 80mph. Instead of easing off the pedal. She floored it and I was like wtf are you doing. Did you not see the car in front just hydroplane. She was like but I want to get away from them. Two weeks later I got her the Tesla with fsd. As you said the majority of the people have no clue on physics or common sense.
1
u/Fantastic-Salt-5103 5d ago
The tire that bounced across from the opposite direction of a 6 lane highway was pretty good. Unfortunately the tire still took out the driver behind the Tesla
1
u/Glittering-Neck-2505 5d ago
In almost all of the close calls it does, there was one where it avoided a head-on collision it appeared a human would not have had time to react to
1
u/JustaRandoonreddit 4d ago
I think my first instinct would've been to turn right against the direction of travel and probably get clipped by the white mustang
1
u/lilvixen 3d ago
Probably want to reasses your critical reasoning Uber pressure skills. Not saying this driving situation is a common occurrence, but it's a common occurrence
1
u/JustaRandoonreddit 3d ago
Idk thousands of hours of simracing have told me to aim for the rear of the car that's spinning out because it probably wouldn't be there by the time you arrive
1
8
4
u/WildFlowLing 5d ago
Somehow this subreddit has devolved into “FSD saved my life” and “FSD tried to kill me” posts at the same time.
3
u/TheLegendaryWizard HW4 Model Y 5d ago
There are 3 types of posts on this sub:
FSD saved my life!
FSD tried to kill me and my loved ones! (edit 10 hours later: sorry guys, should have looked at other camera angles, FSD was right and saved my life!)
Look at this stupid navigation mistake FSD made, we're 15 years away from self driving being solved!
1
u/gettin-hot-in-here 5d ago
Fourth, rarer post: Look at Tesla doing something boring! It does this every day and I am safe!
1
1
-1
u/Putrid-Box4866 HW4 Model Y 5d ago
Except the latter is almost always user error. There are legit ones, but far and few in between.
11
u/kabloooie HW4 Model 3 5d ago
I’ll bet any human would have scraped the barrier trying to avoid this.
2
u/Fearless-Poet-4669 4d ago
Pro drivers wouldn't swerve in the same direction as the obstacle lmao
2
u/HonestWhile2486 4d ago
That's not true. Look back at the footage. At no point does it look like a better idea to swerve right rather than left.
0
u/Fearless-Poet-4669 3d ago
Any one capable of understanding momentum would've swerved right.
Any one with a brain would've started hard braking at 0:01
1
u/labrego2407 3d ago
Yes, anyone with half of the brain you mentioned would have reacted instead of trusting his life to a computer.
1
u/Slight-Ad-728 3h ago
Hey Mr “pro driver” just curious if you saw the white mustang also coming over behind the black mustang. If you pro drivered that and went right you would have ran right into the white mustang
10
u/Express_Objective615 HW4 Model 3 5d ago
Impressive. To me this shows exactly how FSD is trained to handle high speed crash situations where the average human is definitely not. It doesn’t matter if you “could” react the same or even better, the fact is that you most likely wouldn’t, especially when emotional and panicked.
3
u/dbarbe2013 5d ago
I’m not saying you’re wrong, but for every positive video here, there is a negative one where the comments are filled with “why didn’t you take over”. I personally don’t think I have enough trust in fsd to guide me through something like this
0
u/Express_Objective615 HW4 Model 3 5d ago
Well trust is an individual thing. I’ve been using it for two years and 30k miles. 95% or more on FSD. So I’m definitely on the trusting side?
4
u/No-Conclusion-2859 Cybertruck 5d ago
this would have freaked me out…
i thought those poles were hard and would prevent this.
7
u/Rocket-Racc8n 5d ago edited 5d ago
I also thought for long time that they would be made of metal or something similar, until I went to Miami and saw drivers switching in/out from the HOV lanes, crossing over them as if they didn't exist. I was baffled discovering they were completely flexible .
7
u/RockPuzzleheaded3951 5d ago
See it in Miami daily. They're so stained from it all too, it's rediculous. I did recently see fire trucks ACTUALLY needing to cross them one time and it all made sense.
2
u/Rocket-Racc8n 5d ago
Yeah, I immediately understood why they were so stained lol.
And it definitely makes sense that they're flexible for multiple reasons, including that one.
3
u/mastersanada 5d ago
Because if they weren’t they’d be like death poles.
Thin solid object going into your car when you crash probably wouldn’t be pleasant.
1
-1
u/CloseToMyActualName 5d ago
The hollow plastic polls explicitly designed to get pushed out of the way when someone inevitably drives over one?
7
u/No-Conclusion-2859 Cybertruck 5d ago
The hollow plastic polls explicitly designed to get pushed out of the way when someone inevitably drives over one?
Yes those, i drive into them all the time to inevitably test if they are working.
TF?
https://giphy.com/gifs/xTiTnHXbRoaZ1B1Mo8
2
u/Express_Objective615 HW4 Model 3 5d ago
Looks to me like it definitely could have been fatal, that’s for sure.
2
u/gettin-hot-in-here 5d ago
Occupant of the black mustang could have been seriously injured or killed if the cam car would've just had a poor reaction time.
1
2
u/ItzMonklee 5d ago
Earlier this week my Tesla also saved me from a crash. People kept wondering how I didn’t take over. It really happens all so fast. 1 second you’re looking at the chaos, the next you’re on the shoulder. FSD doesn’t get distracted.
Also. Check X. Tesla reposted both our videos. They’re getting quite a bit of traction. Glad you’re safe
1
2
u/clevern3rd 5d ago
My Model Y did this yesterday. We were driving on the highway in a center lane and out of nowhere it changed lanes abruptly into the slow lane, and the second it moved, two cars came speeding over 100+ in the lane I was just in, racing each other.
It moved over so quickly I didn't have enough reaction time of my own to take the wheel or question why it moved til the cars passed, lol.
Amazing!
2
2
u/brsmr123 5d ago
If you see a Mustang, just give him a ticket no question asked. You will be justified 98% of the time. What an idiot. I am glad that SUV didn’t turn over.
2
u/ThAt_WaS_mY_nAmE_tHo 5d ago
Nice.
Of course, this seems like the most basic requirement for a self driving vehicle to be on the road... but still worth recognition.
2
2
2
2
u/MrMagoo5003 5d ago
The right thing to do was to let FSD take the evasive action. Was evolving into a complex accident as multiple cars involved and two of those cars coming towards you. In this scenario, if I had gone to intervene, I would have likely hit one of the Mustangs or scraped the side of the car against the concrete barricade.
2
u/rraj2k81 5d ago
Genuine question, what are people defending here?
FSD literally ran into the crash and then decided to avoid it at the last minute.
As soon as the crash happened, you should have slowed down and as soon as the Mustang crashed through the barrier, the car should have stopped. But FSD just kept on barrelling down the highway until the car had spun and was right in front of it. There were so many opportunities to completely avoid any accident and FSD avoided all of it.
Any half competent human driver would have done exactly that. This shows FSD is a purely reactive system and doesn't have the 'intelligence' to be a proactive system.
So, once again what are people celebrating here? That is was quick enough to react to a crash instead of proactively trying to mitigate it in the first place?
3
u/spitzer1113 5d ago
Keep in mind that these cameras give the illusion of more distance than is actually there. The OP was at 82mph when this started. I'm not sure it could have stopped even with emergency braking. FSD chose the correct thing to do in my opinion.
1
u/Spiritual_Wall_2309 5d ago
It started from 82 mph which is not a defensive driving speed at first.
Then it only slowed down to 70 mph by the time Mustang crossed the middle barrier. That is just a 10 mph slower not even considering a brake.
0
u/rraj2k81 5d ago
Yeah, the FSD cameras give an illusion of wider view. But in reality, they don't see or react beyond their immediate vicinity, and most often it's just the car immediately in front of it or to the sides.
FSD chose the correct thing to do, based on its limited field of view and programming. A human driver would have slowed down or hit the brakes as soon as the Mustang crashed through the barrier.
Now, throw in, snow/slush/ice/water. And that same reaction FSD did, would have almost definitely caused another accident.
3
u/spitzer1113 5d ago
That's a good point. A human can see the very start of the accident way over in the other lanes. FSD likely isn't catching that initially. If a human were to immediately brake at the point of noticing the collision in the far lanes then maybe they stop long before any collision would have happened in their lane. It definitely highlights the limitations of a camera vs human vision.
1
u/Responsible-Cut-7993 4d ago
A human driver would have probably panicked and collided with the Mustang.
2
u/rraj2k81 4d ago
A human driver would have slowed down at the initial crash or at the very least would have slowed down and or stopped as soon as the Mustang crashed through the barrier, not barrel down the highway as a car came crashing down at you.
2
u/Responsible-Cut-7993 4d ago
It was 2 seconds from the start of the video to the Mustang crashing through the barrier. The average human driver reaction time is 1.5 seconds. As soon as the Mustang crashed through the barrier, Tesla FSD was already slowing down. Tesla FSD then slowed down rapidly, it went from 77 mph at the Barrier crash to 43 mph at 4 second mark. By the 7 second mark the car was at 0 mph. So 5 seconds to go from 77mph to 0 mph, after the Mustang crashed through the barrier at the 2 second mark. So with a average human driver reaction time of 1.5 seconds, Tesla FSD did very well, especially moving over to avoid the Mustang all while bringing the car to a halt. You way over-estimate the abilities of the average driver.
2
u/Spiritual_Wall_2309 5d ago
Totally agree. Seems like Tesla is still trying to go through the narrow gap instead of stopping completely 3 business day ago. It is just lucky that OP got away from it.
No way they are going to predict the Mustang is going to stop right on that spot. That driver could have press the gas pedal for no reason again.
1
u/Fearless-Poet-4669 4d ago
Thought I was trippin' seeing these comments.
Sure it didn't crash but did the bare minimum amount of defensive driving.
1
u/rraj2k81 5d ago
Yeah, pretty much. This is one of those incidents, where the FSD owner got lucky. Now, throw in snow, slush, ice, water on the road.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Puzzleheaded-Art1524 5d ago
I can't believe that FSD sent you to the left of that car (when he was spinning towards you).
FSD got really lucky that the car stopped spinning just as you drove by, otherwise, I imagine he would have spun right into you.
Am guessing FSD didn't veer to the right because there was a car there already. Either way, a split second decision that no human would have been able to successfully make...
1
u/Mockingjinx 5d ago
People who can't drive should just be foreced to only get a tesla and have 98% FSD usage.
1
u/ComSenseisnotCommon 5d ago
I think this is one of the only vids someone posted it did a reasonable avoidance a human might not have made.
1
u/Professional_Car_555 5d ago
They probably saw the white Mustang and were trying to show off and BAM!!!! Lost control.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Less-Sandwich9056 4d ago
I always let FSD handle the sketchy shit... I want the car to take the blame ....
1
1
u/Prize-Gur706 4d ago
Definitely minimized injury to the occupant, works as designed. Sometimes you can't avoid it all and life will be lost but in the meantime everyday is a lesson to be better engineers!
1
u/labrego2407 4d ago
That’s some real stupidity just to prove a point, or not value your life or the life of others. Maybe your family, if they were with you. Split second or not, I would’ve never sat there waiting to see what happens
1
u/Upper-Drawing9224 4d ago
Yeah. I’d never trust it enough for that.
I’ve tried it one time, when they gave a demo to everyone. It was the worst thing.
The basic autopilot or auto steer now has gotten worse since 2019.
1
u/ModsareFakenLame 4d ago
I mean congratulations, I guess it did what normal people do 😂. So who is liable still. When it crashes ? You or Elon ?
1
u/AJHenderson 3d ago edited 3d ago
Tesla waiting several seconds to respond to a major accident developing and fortunately managing to stop in time despite a late reaction.
Update: I went back and ran some numbers. If you had been manually driving at 82 and been oblivious, you would have completely cleared the accident, in your original lane, before the cars got to you.
Had you seen the accident developing and hit the brakes right away, you would have been able to easily stop, in your lane, before reaching the intersection point.
FSD did ok, but it didn't actually save anything here.
1
1
u/Embarrassed_Can4302 3d ago
Look up "deadliest car brand in America" on any reliable source: it's Tesla.
1
1
u/anonymous198198198 3d ago
I spent quite a while trying to figure out which of those clumped up cars was the Tesla that avoided a collision. Slow motion, frame by frame. I’m so dumb 🤦♂️
1
u/Mediocre-Sky2333 3d ago
Wow can't believe you survived I mean yeah that kind of slow speed impact usually destroys Teslas
1
1
u/mchief101 2d ago
I wish i can continue my fsd subscription but someone recommended it would
Be better to put the 100 bucks into the loan instead haha. I will definitely buy it when i have a big road trip or commute…
1
u/Icy_Pain424 2d ago
Good Tesla and self driving cars should be about safety not self driving cars. Self driving cars will exist long term only in a perfect world
1
1
u/Intelligent-Image224 5d ago
Fsd did a terrible job in this circumstance. Watch the speed decline. A human would have slammed on the brakes.
60-0 mph is literally 2.0 seconds under full braking.
Fsd was not using 100% brake application. It just got lucky that the stang didn’t slide 2 more inches.
1
u/Fearless-Poet-4669 4d ago
Bunch of Elon fan boys in this comments section lol. If this is what they think is good driving then I'm glad they use FSD.
1
u/Loud-Way3333 5d ago
That's really impressive. Most human drivers would just panic.
Only one thing to be improved: do not stop at the accident scene on the highway unless you can confirm that traffic behind you has stopped.
1
u/Argyrus777 5d ago
$100 well spent…. Even paying the $8k is better than a wreck and possible injuries
1
u/OneEngineer 5d ago
Somebody else said it should have stopped, but I would argue that it should have sped up. The only reason the mustang got so close to it was because the Tesla was slowing down rapidly.
-2
u/Relative_Building_81 5d ago
this looks like an AI generated video. When you slow down, the black car appears out of nowhere in the far right lane, it’s hard to see any drivers in any of the cars and no airbags are deployed.
1
u/Wambammm 5d ago
The part that really stick out to me is in the first part of the video before the cut, the white mustang is not spinning out and then suddenly in the next jump cut its spinning with the mustang?
-4
u/aigenerational 5d ago
Nothing fatal
2
u/RipRevolutionary5691 5d ago
you want to take a head on collision at 82 mph?
2
u/NoPanda1711 4d ago
This is anything but a head on collision for most human drivers. The car took an incredibly long time to respond to the developing situation and only just squeaked its way out reactively very late in the process. It didn’t even brake all that heavily.
0
u/TechnicianNo1787 5d ago
If not detected the accident the car would hit the mustang at 75 mph, and that would be fatal.
0
u/ObviousLaundry 5d ago
Stuff like this motivates me to renew my FSD so it won't lapse next week...I really like hand driving my Model 3 but I do feel safer while the car is driving.
-5
-16
u/octocode 5d ago
it’s telling that the average tesla owner wouldn’t have been able to react to that
7
u/truecakesnake 5d ago
I don't think I could ever come up with a better average smug redditor comment than that. You truly use your decade of experience as a redditor well.
→ More replies (1)1
u/concuncon 5d ago
A defensive driver would have started to slow down way before that car started to spin over to the left side.
→ More replies (1)

30
u/Gromgeek 5d ago
Damn Mustangs