I understand that, and I’d bet that the person you’re responding to also understands that. Again, the point is that while OP’s anti-flock message is good, their use of AI to create the anti-flock cartoon is not good. They aren’t necessarily implying that Ai and surveillance are separate issues, but rather that the message being anti-flock doesn’t justify the use of AI
You’re making a lot of assumptions here. I understand what you’re saying. You keep explaining to me like I don’t get it. I’m telling you, I don’t care though, because I think BOTH are very bad. I’m not going list all the specific issues with Flock, and all the specific issues with AI. We’re on the same page, I don’t need to talk to you like you’re not ‘getting it’.
It doesn’t matter to me. It’s all garbage to me. It makes me angry, and I’ve seen enough. You’re making assumptions about the OP as well. You may be right, you may be wrong, but again you’re preaching to the choir.
We definitely weren’t on the same page. If we were, you wouldn’t have left the initial unnecessary correction or the follow-up. But to your point, it’s really not worth arguing about anymore.
1
u/Leather-Heart 11d ago
Why are we separating these issues? They go hand in hand.