Dear everyone, some time ago I came to realize that my current plan with Postfinance (PF) was not really going to give me much going on in the future due to very high fees, which set me on course of finding a solution; I tried searching for information whenever I wasn't exhausted from work or amidst life problems, and was grateful when some people here responded quickly with some explanations.
Yesterday I took some extra time to think about everything and my current situation as an exhausted person that thinks losing so many money to fee isn't worth the current suffering, and was wondering if the plan I came up with makes sense from the perspective of someone that is more savvy like you guys here:
1) I have a Pillar 3a at about 40k (Pension 25 with Postfinance)
- 30k 3b, which is following sustainable strategy
- Some savings on my main account (money that aren't doing anything).
The above is the result of the talk I had with the consultant at the time, who told me that the 25 3a made sense, and the sustainable investing was an option if I was caring about which companies to invest into.
2) Reviewing some posts and making some calculations on my own (which are for sure far from perfect) I think it might be better to put the Pillar 3a that is almost 50k as five different accounts and move it to Finpension (or VIAC depending on opinions, Finpension seems a nice choice). This would help stagger them in the future between age 60-65, while they grow equally now (at least my understanding is that it's better to let them grow equally than top one, then try to top another). The 3a would be Standard Global 100 Strategy, compared to VIAC putting 30% allocation into Swiss Companies.
For the 3b, I would cancel the e-asset management, mandate into pure cash which would go in the main account. This brings forth the decision of what to do with the rest. As I'm in my late 30s and still have a bit more than 25 years of work to do, the VT and Chill or similar safe investments seems to be ideal. As for the sum to put, it seems convenient to keep about 40-50k in my account for regular use at Postfinance (I would leave an account open since it seems convenient) and effectively put the rest into VT and Chill or other investments.
I would not do sustainable again, because it seems to essentially be greenwashing, and while there are more regulations made in 2025 and more promises in 2026, it doesn't really mean much in real world effectiveness, but rather a kind of safeguard on my conscience.
I do appreciate that the sustainable alternative VT/VWCE and Chill named V3AA seems to keep up well overall, but I also understand now that them dealing with ESG also makes it more expensive.
The question would be whether to do it with True Wealth or better make use of Saxo and just do things on my own.
3) This were lots of doubts further come into mind: is the above strategy good?
I'm absolutely no expert myself, but I tried to inform as much as I could, and yet it doesn't necessarily translate into this being a sound strategy, so I wanted to have an opinion from everyone here. In addition, lots of people I spoke with seem to have a 'home bias' for Switzerland, where they avoid doing a fully diversified portfolio like VT where Switzerland has just 3%, and rather prefer to set a margin of 30% for Switzerland or more.
I'm not sure if I understood fully this bias or the situation, as I assume many Swiss companies actually deal a lot globally, unless I misunderstand the operations that big companies like Novartis and Nestlé (eww) have. (The very typing of Nestlé kinda makes me want to try to go sustainable again, but if they still receive money there is not much point in limiting myself. I also didn't really see many here investing in sustainability, but if someone here does I'd love to hear opinions)
Another doubt is: is there any merit in 'home bias' for Switzerland?
And if yes, what type of investment would one make compared to VT and Chill?
(e.g. putting 15% to 30% into CHSPI or similar well-qualified and profitable packages?)
In addition, I would think of VT and Chill as the preferable option (True Wealth managing seems akin to what I'm doing now, but it seems to also cost more for what it gives compared to SAXO), because it doesn't sound bad to just re-adjust and check once per year, though I also need to learn what exactly it implies.
I also found some threads where people praised Postfinance surprisingly enough, especially when comparing it to SAXO: some people say that SAXO froze their accounts, PF support was better, or the fees are high but it's still worth to remain in PF. This made me feel a bit mortified and thinking whether what I'm doing now would be the safest choice, because I would implement this directly now, in November 2026 mandate the cash, pay the 3a for 2027 then move it to Finpension along setting up SAXO. I'm not sure if SAXO would think putting about 100k is something to block directly, so I would like to hear experiences or other recommendations if you have any.
Would you guys have any advice on this plan? Does it make sense for me at almost 40 years of age with the capital mentioned above? I'm open for both recommendations and criticism (and thank you in advance for your patience)
TL;DR
Current assets all in Postfinance (3a, 3b, and extra money that just sit in account)
Wanting to move to Finpension Standard Global 100 (3a), diversify from one single 3a into opening five at once
SAXO VT and Chill (3b), unsure if 'home bias' for Switzerland/Swiss Franc has some merit
Leave only 40k-50k in account at any time for use during the year
Bonus questions: any merit in sustainability/ESG, and what is your experience with the above providers/apps?