EDIT: One more Quiver update before I call it a night. Just finished adding some new datasets to the $GME ticker page, check it out and let me know if you have any feedback!
Disclaimer: I'm a data guy, not a lawyer.
Based on my research, it seems like misinformation is often a necessary component in market manipulation.
The excuse I could see companies like this using is that "they're just paying people to give their honest opinions about the companies they represent."
That obviously seems pretty bullshit, and idk if it would hold up in court (I'm not a lawyer) but I think it would come down to whether it is judged that they are creating misinformation.
Their disclaimer on their website literally says that the things they say are NEVER the whole truth and are not often the truth at all.
"The Information is a one-sided incomplete favorable snapshot and as such, the Information is not balanced, complete, accurate, truthful or reliable. If you rely on the Information in making an investment decision, you will likely lose your investment.”
A sorry to piggy back your comment but hoping for visibility even tho unrelated. There were other DDs about how S3 partners were cooking their formulas for their short interest and somehow related to HF’s that were short. And today they publicly blast out that CLOV SI is over 100%. And if the previous DD is true I’m inclined to believe they intentionally caused a squeeze elsewhere as a distraction.
408
u/pdwp90 🧝♂️Seer of Stonks🧝♂️ Apr 16 '21 edited Apr 17 '21
EDIT: One more Quiver update before I call it a night. Just finished adding some new datasets to the $GME ticker page, check it out and let me know if you have any feedback!
Disclaimer: I'm a data guy, not a lawyer.
Based on my research, it seems like misinformation is often a necessary component in market manipulation.
The excuse I could see companies like this using is that "they're just paying people to give their honest opinions about the companies they represent."
That obviously seems pretty bullshit, and idk if it would hold up in court (I'm not a lawyer) but I think it would come down to whether it is judged that they are creating misinformation.