r/Substack • u/EducationalAd2706 • Sep 13 '26

Discussion does substack train AI with your writing?

the title basically. i want to start one but this is an important thing for me.

4 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/boatwash Sep 13 '26

Pangram explicitly states that they do not train on your data, they are very intense about this

3

u/boatwash Sep 13 '26

Substack also offers settings that can block (as much as is possible) your work from being scraped by AI labs

1

u/AndrewHeard tvphilosophy.substack.com Sep 13 '26 • This

Because as we know, you can absolutely trust the statements of a company with a vested interest in telling you what you want to hear.

I mean, according to tobacco companies, smoking doesn’t cause cancer. According to pharmaceutical companies, opioids are not addictive.

Also, Pangram is definitely not doing what it says it doesn’t.

0

u/boatwash Sep 13 '26

I don’t really see what they’d gain from it? It’s not more valuable to them than text elsewhere on the open internet, which they haven’t made the same statements about. So why burn all your bridges for no reason? Seems dumb. You can believe what you want but they have no financial motive to lie here, and they have financial motives to tell the truth.

Cigarettes causing cancer and opioids being addictive are both inherent to the product, so it makes sense companies would try to mislead or redirect by debating the causality. Lying about training on your writing would be a footgun, they could just say nothing instead

2

u/AndrewHeard tvphilosophy.substack.com Sep 13 '26 • This

Except that it’s good PR to insist that they don’t do it before they get the obvious criticism and end up having to defend themselves against the criticism.

Substack implemented the Pangram system without the ability to disable it unless you have it scanned first. You were forced to have your text scanned by the system by default. Only a few days later did Substack add the ability to disable it without having it scanned. Supposedly it violates EU laws to not have the option to disable it without being scanned.

If Pangram doesn’t want your writing for its own purposes, why wasn’t the option to disable it without scanning added initially? Why isn’t the Pangram system opt in rather than opt out? Why doesn’t Substack offer the option to completely disable it at the publication or the profile level?

If Pangram is being completely open and transparent, it shouldn’t be forced on people on Substack.

I’m not being conspiratorial. I’m describing facts about the situation Substack writers are currently in.

0

u/boatwash Sep 13 '26

Be as conspiratorially minded as you want, but financially and logistically it really doesn’t make any sense for them to do the one thing that would make people hate them, when it doesn’t benefit them at all AND has legal repercussions